The chain is listed as 5.88mm to the outside of the plates (9speed was/is
6.57) and the inside is unchanged at 2.32mm. I don't have a campag reference handy.
Peter
"wannagofast" <
[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> think you have to add 1/2 thediffernce in cog thickness to spacer difference, so it 22/100ths.
> perhaps enough to make noisey. over ten
cogs
> would that be 9x.22mm? of about a spoke's diameter?
>
> "Robin Hubert" <
[email protected]> wrote in message
>
news:[email protected]...
> > "Dave Mayer" <
[email protected]> wrote in message
> >
news:[email protected]...
> > > Shimano was boxed into a corner on this. They needed a 10-speed
system
> > > because Campy had one. They also had to produce a cog spacing that
was
> > > different enough from Campy's 10-speed so as to not to be compatible. However, they were
> > > limited by the 130mm rear stay spacing in road
bikes.
> > > Only one way to go... really thin.
> > >
> > > Next question: does this mean that Campy 10-speed chains will be too
> thick
> > > for Shimano cogsets?
> >
> > It's hard to imagine 17 one-hundreths of a millimeter making that much
of
> a
> > difference.
> >
> >
> > >
> > > "Peter Vesel" <
[email protected]> wrote in message
> > >
news
[email protected]...
> > > > From the new Dura-ace catalogue at the Bicycling Australia Show
> > > >
> > > > 10 speed cog width 1.6mm 10 speed spacer width 2.35mm
> > > > =3.95mm spacing
> > > >
> > > > comparing to Campag from Sheldon's site 10 speed cog 1.7 mm 10 speed spacer 2.42 mm
> > > > =4.12 spacing
> > > >
> > > > Don't know if this has been posted before, but I know I hadn't seen
it
> > > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Robin Hubert <
[email protected]>
> >
> >
>
