cliff said:OK, I've read Sheldon's Shimano page and did a search of this newsgroup
and haven't fournd the answer to these questions:
The HG 8 speed cassette has a spacing of 3.0 mm between cogs. I have
an 11t cog that from an HG 8 cassette that yields 3.35 mm. What gives?
It is what it is. If it's 3.35 then that's what it is.
Shimano sometimes made the last position (or two) slightly different
spacing, but I think that was mostly with 7 speeds.
Quoted message said:The other question is regarding a shimano compatible freehub on a phil
wood hub that had a 8 speed HG cassette that fit fine and replacing it
with an STR 8 speed cassette left a small space requiring a spacer so
the lockring would tighten. IOW, the XT cassette seems almost a ahlf
m narrower.
Some second position cogs were designed to be assembled together with
a thin 1.2 mm steel spacer. May not be the case with your cassette,
but might be worth ruling out. See
http://www.shimano-europe.com/cycling/phpimages/productserie/service_pdf/R610B.pdf
for an illustrated example.
Also, you can often find exploded views on the Shimano Europe cycling
web site. Just type in the shimano part number for your cassette, e.g.
CS-HG70, in the product search window near the bottom of the page. See
http://www.shimano-europe.com/cycling/
Quoted message said:TW, I think that 11t cog (from question 1)came from that
original HG cassette. What's going on here?
Mixed parts? See if every cog carries at least one common letter.
Shimano assigns one or two letters to each "sprocket teeth group", so
a properly matched cluster should have the same letter on every cog.
Quoted message said:Please offer some clarity! Thanks.
cliff
Also, and this is a long shot, there was a batch of Shimano XT
cassettes with improper spacing, and the symptom was that the lock
ring never quite tightened. I even saw a one-page bulletin from
Shimano explaining the issue, and that they would replace any faulty
cassette. Maybe you've got one of those?