Should altsports site continue?



Status
Not open for further replies.
On Tue, 13 May 2003 10:20:42 +0100, "Shaun Rimmer" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>Dave W <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
>> On Mon, 12 May 2003 16:17:01 +0100, "Shaun Rimmer" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> >Your pathetic assumptions and/or bad memory once again catch you out ya silly fool.
>>
>> I assume nothing, you are a pastey boy. We've seen the photo's.
>
>Like I care if your eyes need testing, heheheh.............
>
>
>Shaun aRe

whoosh.....right by it went. Without even a spackling of comprehension on your part.

Dave (par for the course)
 
On 12 May 2003 12:17:15 -0700, [email protected] (The Ogre) wrote:

>"<<<<<< ]] gun_dog99 [[ >>>>>>" <||||||| woof-woof |||||> wrote in message
>news:<[email protected]>...
>> Answer here or in the poll at the site. http://altsports.nuvisionmedia.net/index.php

>
>Oh and spamming the group with requests like this is flamebait.
>
>-- The Ogre

Damn, I'd better rethink my first thought when you posted a link to yours then. It appears I was
wrong in thinking nothing about it.

Dave (Won't get fooled again!)
 
Dave W <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> On Tue, 13 May 2003 10:20:42 +0100, "Shaun Rimmer" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> >Dave W <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> >> On Mon, 12 May 2003 16:17:01 +0100, "Shaun Rimmer" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> >Your pathetic assumptions and/or bad memory once again catch you out
ya
> >> >silly fool.
> >>
> >> I assume nothing, you are a pastey boy. We've seen the photo's.
> >
> >Like I care if your eyes need testing, heheheh.............
> >
> >
> >Shaun aRe
>
> whoosh.....right by it went. Without even a spackling of comprehension on your part.

Like hell child.

> Dave (par for the course)

Your 'par', dipstick.

Now, get away, your general icky-ness is making me queasy.

Shaun aRe
 
On Tue, 13 May 2003 13:24:42 +0100, "Shaun Rimmer" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>Dave W <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
>> On 12 May 2003 12:17:15 -0700, [email protected] (The Ogre) wrote:
>
>> Dave (Won't get fooled again!)
>
>Heheheheh - Always with the irony - you said that last time ',;~}~

Irony is rampant here is it not? And I don't recall saying "Won't get fooled again" concerning
alleged site postings pertaining to MTB as spam. Did I? Go and see if you can google up that quote
and get back to me.

Dave (FETCH BOY!)
 
On Tue, 13 May 2003 13:23:07 +0100, "Shaun Rimmer" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>Dave W <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
>> On Tue, 13 May 2003 10:20:42 +0100, "Shaun Rimmer" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >Dave W <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
>> >> On Mon, 12 May 2003 16:17:01 +0100, "Shaun Rimmer" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> >Your pathetic assumptions and/or bad memory once again catch you out
>ya
>> >> >silly fool.
>> >>
>> >> I assume nothing, you are a pastey boy. We've seen the photo's.
>> >
>> >Like I care if your eyes need testing, heheheh.............
>> >
>> >
>> >Shaun aRe
>>
>> whoosh.....right by it went. Without even a spackling of comprehension on your part.
>
>Like hell child.

See, there it goes again.
>
>> Dave (par for the course)
>
>Your 'par', dipstick.

Uh, that would be YOU'RE.
>
>
>Now, get away, your general icky-ness is making me queasy.

Considering where you live, I'd say it's diet.

>
>
>Shaun aRe BLAND
 
Dave W <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> On Tue, 13 May 2003 13:23:07 +0100, "Shaun Rimmer" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> >Dave W <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> >> On Tue, 13 May 2003 10:20:42 +0100, "Shaun Rimmer" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >Dave W <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> >> >> On Mon, 12 May 2003 16:17:01 +0100, "Shaun Rimmer" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> >Your pathetic assumptions and/or bad memory once again catch you
out
> >ya
> >> >> >silly fool.
> >> >>
> >> >> I assume nothing, you are a pastey boy. We've seen the photo's.
> >> >
> >> >Like I care if your eyes need testing, heheheh.............
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >Shaun aRe
> >>
> >> whoosh.....right by it went. Without even a spackling of comprehension on your part.
> >
> >Like hell child.
>
> See, there it goes again.

Only in your pathetically limited imagination, silly boy.

> >> Dave (par for the course)
> >
> >Your 'par', dipstick.
>
> Uh, that would be YOU'RE.

Uh 'no' - that would be 'your', exactly as I wrote it the first time. Is English not your
first language?

> >Now, get away, your general icky-ness is making me queasy.
>
> Considering where you live, I'd say it's diet.
>
> >
> >
> >Shaun aRe BLAND

Blah-blah-blah. You get duller by the millisecond.

Shaun aRe - 'Yawn'.
 
Dave W <[email protected]> wrote in message news:eek:[email protected]...
> On Tue, 13 May 2003 13:24:42 +0100, "Shaun Rimmer" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> >Dave W <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> >> On 12 May 2003 12:17:15 -0700, [email protected] (The Ogre) wrote:
> >
> >> Dave (Won't get fooled again!)
> >
> >Heheheheh - Always with the irony - you said that last time ',;~}~
>
> Irony is rampant here is it not? And I don't recall saying "Won't get fooled again" concerning
> alleged site postings pertaining to MTB as spam. Did I? Go and see if you can google up that quote
> and get back to me.

Get back to yourself ya fool.

> Dave (FETCH BOY!)

Your new name suits you, gofer.

Shaun aRe
 
On Tue, 13 May 2003 14:43:26 +0100, "Shaun Rimmer" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>Dave W <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
>> On Tue, 13 May 2003 13:23:07 +0100, "Shaun Rimmer" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >Dave W <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
>> >> On Tue, 13 May 2003 10:20:42 +0100, "Shaun Rimmer" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >Dave W <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
>> >> >> On Mon, 12 May 2003 16:17:01 +0100, "Shaun Rimmer" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> >Your pathetic assumptions and/or bad memory once again catch you
>out
>> >ya
>> >> >> >silly fool.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I assume nothing, you are a pastey boy. We've seen the photo's.
>> >> >
>> >> >Like I care if your eyes need testing, heheheh.............
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >Shaun aRe
>> >>
>> >> whoosh.....right by it went. Without even a spackling of comprehension on your part.
>> >
>> >Like hell child.
>>
>> See, there it goes again.
>
>Only in your pathetically limited imagination, silly boy.
>
>> >> Dave (par for the course)
>> >
>> >Your 'par', dipstick.
>>
>> Uh, that would be YOU'RE.
>
>Uh 'no' - that would be 'your', exactly as I wrote it the first time. Is English not your first
>language?

O.K explain to me what YOUR PAR is? what is a par? do you have one? It is mine, but apprently
not yours.
>
>> >Now, get away, your general icky-ness is making me queasy.
>>
>> Considering where you live, I'd say it's diet.
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >Shaun aRe BLAND
>
>Blah-blah-blah. You get duller by the millisecond.
>
>Shaun aRe - 'Yawn'.
>

much like your diet.....
 
Dave W <[email protected]> wrote in message
> On 12 May 2003 12:17:15 -0700, [email protected] (The Ogre) wrote:
>
> >"<<<<<< ]] gun_dog99 [[ >>>>>>" <||||||| woof-woof |||||> wrote in
> >> Answer here or in the poll at the site. http://altsports.nuvisionmedia.net/index.php
>
> >
> >Oh and spamming the group with requests like this is flamebait.
> >
> >-- The Ogre
>
> Damn, I'd better rethink my first thought when you posted a link to yours then. It appears I was
> wrong in thinking nothing about it.
>
> Dave (Won't get fooled again!)

Gee, Dave what a suprise to find you trolling around here. As usual

ignoring your leg humping so you decided to come hump mine for a while?

What a useless piece of **** you are.

-- The Ogre
 
Dave W <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> On Tue, 13 May 2003 14:43:26 +0100, "Shaun Rimmer" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> >Dave W <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> >> On Tue, 13 May 2003 13:23:07 +0100, "Shaun Rimmer" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >Dave W <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> >> >> On Tue, 13 May 2003 10:20:42 +0100, "Shaun Rimmer" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Dave W <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >> >> >news:[email protected]...
> >> >> >> On Mon, 12 May 2003 16:17:01 +0100, "Shaun Rimmer" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >Your pathetic assumptions and/or bad memory once again catch you
> >out
> >> >ya
> >> >> >> >silly fool.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> I assume nothing, you are a pastey boy. We've seen the photo's.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Like I care if your eyes need testing, heheheh.............
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Shaun aRe
> >> >>
> >> >> whoosh.....right by it went. Without even a spackling of
comprehension
> >> >> on your part.
> >> >
> >> >Like hell child.
> >>
> >> See, there it goes again.
> >
> >Only in your pathetically limited imagination, silly boy.
> >
> >> >> Dave (par for the course)
> >> >
> >> >Your 'par', dipstick.
> >>
> >> Uh, that would be YOU'RE.
> >
> >Uh 'no' - that would be 'your', exactly as I wrote it the first time. Is English not your first
> >language?
>
> O.K explain to me what YOUR PAR is? what is a par? do you have one? It is mine, but apprently not
> yours.

Trying to explain anything to you is more futile than trying to explain Einstein's general
relativity theory to a dog.

> >> >Now, get away, your general icky-ness is making me queasy.
> >>
> >> Considering where you live, I'd say it's diet.
> >> >
> >> >Shaun aRe BLAND
> >
> >Blah-blah-blah. You get duller by the millisecond.
> >
> >Shaun aRe - 'Yawn'.
> >
>
>
> much like your diet.....

There you go making things up again to fill the void left by your total lack of actual knowledge.

Shaun aRe - maybe gonna be unhooking the dumbarsed dog-fish again soon.
 
On 13 May 2003 21:04:16 -0700, [email protected] (The Ogre) wrote:

>Dave W <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> On 12 May 2003 12:17:15 -0700, [email protected] (The Ogre) wrote:
>>
>> >"<<<<<< ]] gun_dog99 [[ >>>>>>" <||||||| woof-woof |||||> wrote in
>> >> Answer here or in the poll at the site. http://altsports.nuvisionmedia.net/index.php
>>
>> >
>> >Oh and spamming the group with requests like this is flamebait.
>> >
>> >-- The Ogre
>>
>> Damn, I'd better rethink my first thought when you posted a link to yours then. It appears I was
>> wrong in thinking nothing about it.
>>
>> Dave (Won't get fooled again!)
>
>Gee, Dave what a suprise to find you trolling around here. As usual

Not at all. You posted your sites link, did you not?

What's the problem, got tired of JD
>ignoring your leg humping so you decided to come hump mine for a while?

HAHAHAHA, if that's what you want to call it.

>
>What a useless piece of **** you are.

rancid, festering boil on the ass of humanity.
 
Dave W wrote:

>>What a useless piece of **** you are.
>
>

> rancid, festering boil on the ass of humanity.

Hot dang, I love this place :)
 
On Wed, 14 May 2003 19:44:21 +0200, bomba <[email protected]> wrote:

>Dave W wrote:
>
>>>What a useless piece of **** you are.
>>
>>

>> rancid, festering boil on the ass of humanity.
>
>Hot dang, I love this place :)

So do I! So do I.
 
On 14 May 2003 14:48:50 -0700, [email protected] (The Ogre) wrote:

n
>> >> >> Answer here or in the poll at the site. http://altsports.nuvisionmedia.net/index.php
>> >> >
>> >> >Oh and spamming the group with requests like this is flamebait.
>> >> >
>> >> >-- The Ogre
>> >>
>> >> Damn, I'd better rethink my first thought when you posted a link to yours then. It appears I
>> >> was wrong in thinking nothing about it.
>> >>
>> >> Dave (Won't get fooled again!)
>> >
>> >Gee, Dave what a suprise to find you trolling around here. As usual

>>
>> Not at all. You posted your sites link, did you not?
>
>As does everyone else on this list who has a web site. Which is entirely different than posting a
>thread which is deliberately geared towards trying to draw traffic to your site.

How so? You posted your site with the deliberate intention of having others view it did you not?
That IS what it was geared to wasn't it? Why else post it if it was not your deliberate attempt to
have others view it? Same as this guy, right?

If ANYONE else on this
>list had commented that any of my messages were spam I might take it seriously. From you it is just
>leg humping.

That's fine by me. I never said it was spam dumbass! you posted a mountain bike related site. Did I
have to pay to look at it? No. Was it related to the group in which you posted the link? Yes. Not
spam by my defintion. I never even bothered to look at this macrel heads site. Is it mountain bike
related? Do you have to pay for it? I can say by his posting it looked that way to me.

>
>> What's the problem, got tired of JD
>> >ignoring your leg humping so you decided to come hump mine for a while?

nope, just some text driven entertainment. Nothing more.

>
>Didn't originate the phrase but it seems to describe your pitiful trolling efforts quite well.

What trolling efforts? My half assed comment about your site link? Easy hook for you?
>
>> >What a useless piece of **** you are.
>>

>> rancid, festering boil on the ass of humanity.
>
>How creative, do you feel better now?
>
>-- The Ogre http://ogrehut.com

Actually I did. Thanks for the concern.

Dave (See what I was saying Penny?)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.