Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Should I grease a quill stem?

Started by Wayne Menzie · · Last activity · 4 posts · 1,751 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
11 July 2004
Last activity
12 July 2004
Original author
Wayne Menzie
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,751
Views / 30 days
5

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I have a 3T aluminum stem that had a seized expander cone.
    After going a few rounds with it and using the collected
    knowledge of RBT posts I was able to remove it without
    damaging anything. Now I want to reinstall it and I need to
    decide between using Phil Wood grease and some automotive
    anti-seize compound. Anybody have a compelling reason to
    choose one over the other?

    --
    Wayne Menzie

  2. On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:33:56 GMT, Wayne Menzie <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    I have a 3T aluminum stem that had a seized expander cone.
    After going a few rounds with it and using the collected
    knowledge of RBT posts I was able to remove it without
    damaging anything. Now I want to reinstall it and I need to
    decide between using Phil Wood grease and some automotive
    anti-seize compound. Anybody have a compelling reason to
    choose one over the other?

    Anti-sieze is formulated to keep metal parts from siezing
    together, lubricant is formulated to allow parts in motion
    to slide across each other with minimal wear and friction.
    Does this give you a clue?

    By the way, my personal preference is to use the anti-sieze
    only on the wedge, and I use it on *every* surface of the
    wedge that comes into contact with something; quill, steer
    tube, and bolt threads. My less-than-classically-correct-by-some-
    standards riding style causes me to pull up hard on the bars
    at times, and I've noticed that if I get carried away with
    the anti-sieze, the quill can work its way up out of the
    steer tube, albeit slowly.

    --
    Typoes are a feature, not a bug. Some gardening required to
    reply via email. Surrealism is a pectinated ranzel.

  3. Wayne Menzie said:

    I have a 3T aluminum stem that had a seized expander cone.
    After going a few rounds with it and using the collected
    knowledge of RBT posts I was able to remove it without
    damaging anything. Now I want to reinstall it and I need
    to decide between using Phil Wood grease and some
    automotive anti-seize compound. Anybody have a compelling
    reason to choose one over the other?

    Grease is cheaper. Any bearing grease will do.

  4. In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    I have a 3T aluminum stem that had a seized expander cone.
    After going a few rounds with it and using the collected
    knowledge of RBT posts I was able to remove it without
    damaging anything. Now I want to reinstall it and I need to
    decide between using Phil Wood grease and some automotive
    anti-seize compound. Anybody have a compelling reason to
    choose one over the other?

    I'd use regular car wheel bearing waterproof grease. The
    reason I would use this type of grease is because it is
    cheaper than the stuff you mention and works well for this
    type of use.
    -------------
    Alex

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.