johnbamyb said:
I ride a Litespeed Ultimate that I have done component upgrades over the years but the frame is from 1994. I used to race Cat 3 but haven't for several yrs so I don't really follow the current technology. Will a new frame, Carbon or Titanium, make much difference compared to 1994 technology. I noticed the teams in the Tour don't ride titanium. Seems like carbon fiber is the choice - Specialized Tarmac, Scott CR1...
Thanks
My buddy rides a Tuscany of y2k vintage, and I just bought a Sienna. There is a big difference in frame geometry in those two bikes, and some weight differential, mine is lighter and is a compact geo. Mine is quicker and seems to be a better climber. His has more laid back geometry and would be better on a century. He has serious bike lust for the new sienna, but it is an irrational lust.
Carbon is great for one season of racing like the pros do. But if you are a guy that keeps his bike for twelve years, then how do you beat the durability and crashworthiness of a ti bike. For comfort, durability and the sweet feel, ti is the real deal, and nobody does it better than Litespeed.
Ride the new Litespeed models and see if you feel any difference. If not, upgrade your Ultimate with a compact crankset, if you live in hilly spots, since you have a few more years on you and that lower granny is great. Otherwise, if you feel a difference, then spring for the new bike. Either way, keep a bike for twelve years or so, it is tough to think that any bike owes you any more.