JohnO said:Don't give the doper the money outright. Give them a Tinkoff contract. They'd fit right in.
ohhhhhhhh snap. hahaha
JohnO said:Don't give the doper the money outright. Give them a Tinkoff contract. They'd fit right in.
I am thinking along the same lines as you.DiabloScott said:I'm against an amnesty program - not that I'm out for blood but I just don't think it would work.
People cheat or break laws because they can get away with it. Increasing the penalties doesn't change anything because they don't think they will be caught. What changes things is increasing the likelihood that they WILL get caught.
In order to do that we do need the doctors and soigneurs and racers to talk about how they cheat so we can figure out how to catch them at it. And for that we need more motivation than just an amnesty.
limerickman said:I know soem of us have discussed this topic, on an off during the last while but I wanted to give the subject an airing again.
Should an amnesty on the question of doping, be called?
Personally, I think that the sport is in freefall at the moment.
It appears that we have an entire peloton using dopage.
Nearly every day brings news of more cheating.
In addition we have sponsors withdrawing sponsorship from teams and races, which means peoples livelihoods are endangered.
My question is - should an amnesty be called?
I think an amnesty should be called - with binding and draconian conditions.
Any rider/team manager who confesses must do so truthfully and he/she must confess fully to whatever doping practices were availed of.
This amnesty would be a once off pardon for the rider/team manager.
The amnesty period must be finite - say six month period.
After the agreed amnesty period has elapsed - legislation is enacted which provides lifetime bans for riders/teams caught subsequently doping.
All prize money previously won by that rider is, retrospectively, treated as sporting fraud and all money is recouped.
sunman said:I want to revive this post from Lim-
I think it is time for an amnesty including draconian conditions that Lim implied.
Full disclosure followed by
-Lifetime bans for riders
-Bonds posted by teams
-Bans for sponsors, teams, and management
-DNA data for all riders
-3rd party "C" sample control and testing
And whatever else might be necessary. Currently banned riders might be able to buy out their remaining time.
If doping is as pervasive as the contributors to this forum obviously believe, then the sport is a long way from hitting rock-bottom. If most every rider feels so pressured to dope, then it is obvious that the practice is encouraged by management and ignored by sponsors.
Cyclists are far from being the best compensated athletes in sport despite the suffering and risk that professional cycling demand. To ruin the careers and livelihoods of so many riders who, as youngsters, started and excelled in this sport without the slightest idea of cheating seems more arbitrary and draconian than a fair and sweeping amnesty.
It is time to wipe the slate clean, restore the peloton, and establish a new industry-wide anti-doping protocol before the money dries up, the best become mediocre and the fans disappear.
You can add a provision of 10% for all salary and others incomes received by a rider every year , the money will return to the riders at the end of his carrier (manager too).sunman said:I want to revive this post from Lim-
I think it is time for an amnesty including draconian conditions that Lim implied.
Full disclosure followed by
-Lifetime bans for riders
-Bonds posted by teams
-Bans for sponsors, teams, and management
-DNA data for all riders
-3rd party "C" sample control and testing
Hey, somebody agrees with me, I'm shocked. This is what I said last week:Bro Deal said:Only if a full confession is made that reveals all, other riders, team support, doctors, runners, everything. There should be a panel that listens to the tale. If they snicker or guffaw at some Basso-like absurdity then the rider gets banned.
If an amnesty were to work you would have to put the riders in a Prisoner's Dilemma. A requirement for amnesty would have to be giving out the names of others who were involved and after a certain date anyone who had not come forward but who had been implicated by others would get a very heavy penalty.
I agree with this too. The UCI now has leverage to require the riders to squeal by waiving the one year salary penalty. How well this will work is unknown.helmutRoole2 said:I'm going to say no on amnesty because they've had amnesty up to this point. Now the gloves are off. Target testing and investigations are working much better than the system they had before. And, when the ASO boots riders for suspicious activity when they don't have reasonable explanations, that helps too.
There's a new climate. Riders better get used to it.
Now, if we could only figure out how Disco got blood into the Tour.
helmutRoole2 said:I'm going to say no on amnesty because they've had amnesty up to this point. Now the gloves are off. Target testing and investigations are working much better than the system they had before. And, when the ASO boots riders for suspicious activity when they don't have reasonable explanations, that helps too.
There's a new climate. Riders better get used to it.
Now, if we could only figure out how Disco got blood into the Tour.
For the Doc's, soigneurs, mangagers, rider to open up and talk about essentially needs an amnesty.DiabloScott said:I'm against an amnesty program - not that I'm out for blood but I just don't think it would work.
People cheat or break laws because they can get away with it. Increasing the penalties doesn't change anything because they don't think they will be caught. What changes things is increasing the likelihood that they WILL get caught.
In order to do that we do need the doctors and soigneurs and racers to talk about how they cheat so we can figure out how to catch them at it. And for that we need more motivation than just an amnesty.
Screw you, you're Doctor Evil!!!!!!! I watched those movies and I know what you stand for......... And I agree with your boy....You are dumb. You had so many chances to kill Austin Powers and what do you do? You give him a chance to escape!!!!!!Crankyfeet said:Here's a suggestion for the UCI. Enter a team of undercover agents (riders) into the Pro Tour. I'll volunteer, though I'm a little bit old. Allow us to surreptitiously put little motors in our rear hubs like those bikes on the indoor track that they use to pace the field. It would be great to look like your not even trying as you pump out 150 watts on the climbs and stay with the lead group.
Of course, UCI would have to let us win a couple of GT's for street cred. We would only train in black. Then we would have to look sideways in interviews whenever doping came up and change the subject. You know like Levi. That would get us the respect of the dopers in the peloton.
In a couple of years, we could blow the lid off this thing, and perhaps keep the findings off the front pages. Riders would just disappear.
You just... don't... get it, do you Wolfywolfix said:Screw you, you're Doctor Evil!!!!!!! I watched those movies and I know what you stand for......... And I agree with your boy....You are dumb. You had so many chances to kill Austin Powers and what do you do? You give him a chance to escape!!!!!!
Do we look stupid enough to ley Doctor Evil run a team???
I rarely watch movies more then once. But the Austin Power movies and especially Dr Evil are so good........ The quote you have at the bottom is one of the better movie lines of all times.Crankyfeet said:You just don't get it, do you Wolfy
Guard, begin the unnecessarily slow dipping mechanism.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.