Greetings. I have decided to buy a rd bike for daily cummuting and touring. I am having a hard time deciding what size Giant OCR 1 to get - a small or extra small. At the store I had several people look at me and essentially say I could go with either and comfort is paramount, although I don't trust my "comfort" judgment as I haven't had enough rd experience. I am 5' 5" and coming from a mountain bike. Here is my experience with both sizes:
Small (53.1 Top Tube): I feel a bit too stretched out on the small so the suggestion was to exchange the stem for a 70 (the one I tried is a 90) and exchange the handle bars for something narrower to suit my shoulder width better. The seat is at approximately the same height as the handle bars and is pushed as far forward as it will go (with the new stem I would probably push it back a bit). With these changes, if i ride for a month and decide I'm still stretched out, I'm essentially screwed because there would be no more room for more changes to make reaching distance seem shorter.
XSmall (51.1 Top Tube): I am probably an inch closer to the handle bars, and my hands seem to naturally fall on the hoods, so I feel less strteched out than on the size Small. However, the saddle is approx 1 inch (possibly a bit more) higher than the handle bars, and there is no way to raise the handle bars to be level. So basically..the advantages of the extra small is that i can adjust seat, get a larger stem should I decide I want to stretch out more. BUT there is no room to raise the handle bars should I decide I would rather have my seat and my handle bars level. I don't know if a higher seat means I will be less comfortable.
Does anyone have any advice as to which would be the better size for me? I don't want to wind up with a bike size that is a bit big with no margin for adjustments, nor do i want to wind up regretting my decison of a bike that's too small! I'm sorta roped into one or the other at this point.
..I should mention I feel a bit of pull in my back by my neck when riding both sizes (although more when I was riding the small). I am assuming some discomfort would be normal when first getting a bike though?
Thanks for any advice you can provide!!
Small (53.1 Top Tube): I feel a bit too stretched out on the small so the suggestion was to exchange the stem for a 70 (the one I tried is a 90) and exchange the handle bars for something narrower to suit my shoulder width better. The seat is at approximately the same height as the handle bars and is pushed as far forward as it will go (with the new stem I would probably push it back a bit). With these changes, if i ride for a month and decide I'm still stretched out, I'm essentially screwed because there would be no more room for more changes to make reaching distance seem shorter.
XSmall (51.1 Top Tube): I am probably an inch closer to the handle bars, and my hands seem to naturally fall on the hoods, so I feel less strteched out than on the size Small. However, the saddle is approx 1 inch (possibly a bit more) higher than the handle bars, and there is no way to raise the handle bars to be level. So basically..the advantages of the extra small is that i can adjust seat, get a larger stem should I decide I want to stretch out more. BUT there is no room to raise the handle bars should I decide I would rather have my seat and my handle bars level. I don't know if a higher seat means I will be less comfortable.
Does anyone have any advice as to which would be the better size for me? I don't want to wind up with a bike size that is a bit big with no margin for adjustments, nor do i want to wind up regretting my decison of a bike that's too small! I'm sorta roped into one or the other at this point.
..I should mention I feel a bit of pull in my back by my neck when riding both sizes (although more when I was riding the small). I am assuming some discomfort would be normal when first getting a bike though?
Thanks for any advice you can provide!!