Heh Gabe it is a personal taste issue, just because I think the bent looks like something someone
who had never (seen) or built a LWB before, decided to try making one in his garage don't mean
people won't buy it. People buy lots of stuff that make me wonder what is wrong with them....then
eventually they realize the error of their ways and buy what I thought they should have bought in
the 1st place. IMHO (only) the Fairing should make it in2 limited production and what it is attached
to will need to sell in the $3K range to offset only a few being sold each year. First impressions
are often misleading, but there are some bent designs that you can FEEL are destined to be winners
with a long production life....then there is THIS bent...nice fairing though and the fairing is
ideal for pilots who really don't care that they cannot see the pothole, road debris and cute little
squirrel they are about to mow down because the fairing is not clear. It is as if the pilot is
forced to sit in such an upright sitting position in order to see the road ahead via the small
tinted windscreen section of the fairing....you lean back and you could plough into Bambi or a
something the size of a SUV. Just imagine the Liability issues surrounding a fairing that allows you
to plough into the back of a Greyhound Bus that you cannot see in front of you UNLESS you are
sitting in a position equal to that of a MTB. You can bet the farm that people will buy such a
fairing just so that they can be the 1st guy on their block to rear end a Bus. I would not want to
own stock in the Insurance company selling the Liability Insurance for that fairing. When I looked
at those pics you posted...Gardner did NOT look at all pleased. He was probably thinking....damn I'm
glad we are NOT building this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------
"Gabriel DeVault" <
[email protected]> wrote in message
news
[email protected]...
> Couple answers for your intelligent questions.
>
> 1. The steering seems very natural, light and easy. Freddy did the remote thing to eliminate the
> "tiller effect", it worked.
>
> 2. All Callfee prototypes are made using hand wrapped joints, as are their tandems currently.
> Untill they establish a market, then they make the
molds
> for the "lugs". This alone will probably knock a pound off the bike, and it'll look nicer.
>
> 3. I believe different seat are being looked at.
>
> 4. Tell me about it. Still can't find carbon forks for the TE/GRR. Someone could make some cash if
> they built some...
>
> 5. The new socks are zippered all the way to the front.
>
> I can't wait to see one of these painted, Calfee's paint jobs are incredable. We will be getting
> some official web stuff up soon. I'll keep ya' folks posted!
>
>
> "derek" <
[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> > Gabe, Can you say "Sour Grapes?". I have always believed that the reason
bents
> > are not yet mainstream is because of the curmudgeonly personalities some
> of
> > thier riders ;-) Thanks for posting the photos of the Calfee prototype. This promises to be a
> > very successful bent if it goes into production.
It
> > is way cool.
> >
> > Here are some of my observations. I will try to sound intellegent but
> can't
> > guarantee it.
> >
> > 1) The indirect linkage type steering is the most controversial aspect
of
> > the design. I personally have no problem with linkage steering, but
some
> > bent experts are reviled by them. I would love to test ride this bike
to
> > get a feel for the steering.
> >
> > 2) Calfee's trademark carbon fiber gusset's are not evident in the
> photos.
> > I will bet there is a story behind that.
> >
> > 3) With all due respect to Easy Racers, I would opt for a different
seat.
> A
> > Rotator Ti seat would probably drop the weight of this bike by on pound
or
> > so. An Easy Racer Koolback or a Rans seat would weigh more but would
also
> > appeal to a number of riders. If Calfee is smart, they will fabricate a system that will mount
> > different types of seats in order to let folks
> satify
> > individual tastes in the seating department.
> >
> > 4) I am so happy to see a carbon fiber fork on this bent. The recumbent industry generally lags
> > far behind upright road bike technology in this feature.
> >
> > 5) Interesting fairing - the composite with an integrated raised
> plexiglass
> > vision bubble is cool, but how do you manage to see the road though the plexiglass with the
> > cloth sock in place, may I ask?
> >
> > Cheers, Derek "Gabriel DeVault" <
[email protected]> wrote in message
> >
news:[email protected]...
> > > What a bunch of skeptics. As if you can really judge " The pedals are
> way
> > > too close to the pilot, the front Hub is massive, the backrest is too vertical to be
> > > comfortable." by looking at a photo. It will be
available
> > in
> > > different sizes and the seat back is adjustable. The front hub is
> massive?
> > > What's that supposed to mean? It's a standard bottom bracket. As to
why?
> > > Weight! The prototype weighs about 25 lbs, the production version will
> > weigh
> > > less than that by a couple pounds. Much less than any other LWB bent
and
> > > less than most SWB bents as well. Sheesh, what is with you folks,
> someone
> > > poo in your sandbox?
> > >
> > >
> > > "bentnut" <
[email protected]> wrote in message
> > >
news:[email protected]...
> > > >
http://www.cyberonic.net/~gdevault/
> > > >
> > > > Enjoy!
> > > >
> > > > Gabe
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>