Originally Posted by
nonns .
Lim,
There might well be clean riders but how can we tell? Because they seem decent and solid and upright.
Jan Ullrich seemed like a nice chap but apparently liked a liquid spliff once in a while (not to mention other sorts
.
LA allegedly was a toker also as we're now discussing and arguing about.
Stephen Roche? Seemed like a lovely chap. My ma thought he was fantastic. Now we hear he didn't get on well with Kimmage. Was he dirty?
What about Sean K - him of the famous legs picture. Was he or wasn't he? Apparently those were bad times why should he be the exception. He rode enough races that no-one could blame him for being smacky K could we now???!!!! He was another of my heroes. :-< I could never understand a word he said especially after a race but he was the epitome of tough guy cycling hero for me as a youngster.
Contadope. Well no question there. Lepheimer? Cadel Evans well I hope so but you know what who knows. Bradley W. He's English - what a good sort - I want to believe.
Hinault - my all time fave. He was actually seen exhibiting what one could call roid rage in thumping that docker and he was something of a bully also.
Mercx - Pshaw
Moser??
Which of the greats and even not so greats.
Froome. He came from nowhere to suddenly being one of the front runners and his performance was slightly up and down though that could be cos the poor bloke was buggered after the tour. Slightly suspicious but also believable and man do I want to believe.
I mean who the hell are we meant to feel is truly clean. Just the current lot cos they say so?????
I think at this point I'd almost rather believe that they're all clean and give them an amnesty but put in place rules so draconian that if they're caught they're history without possibility of rehabilitation as I've said in one of the other threads.
As for the past well I'm inclined to believe that they were all dirty but it doesn't matter because they were all dirty. Look forward.