D
DrGlen51
Guest
On Fri, 05 Mar 2004 21:40:50 GMT, "Per Elmsäter"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Mike, my boy, enough of this liar thing, there is no
>> bigger liar than you on this site. The Sierra club caught
>> you lying big time and barred you from holding office or
>> ever being a spokesman for their organization because on
>> numerous occasions you spewed forth your radical views
>> and represented yourself and the your positions as those
>> of the Sierra Club, knowing your were not a spokesman and
>> that your views were not shared by the club.
>>
>> The reason the took action against you is because your
>> lying was damaging the clubs reputation. Now that is not
>> harmless lying. Unlike the lying you claim goes on with
>> "all" mountain bikers which is mostly harmless and most
>> often just honest mistakes.
>>
>> Then there is the lie you perpetuate about your being
>> some kind of deep ecologist. What ****, the stuff you
>> write on your website is unsubstatiated nonsense. You say
>> you laid under a tree one fine day and it felt great. So
>> you suddenly start saying how great it is to be a tree
>> based on your feelings of being under it and euphoric. So
>> now you go around hugging trees and trying to save whip
>> snakes. Luckily it wasn't rainy and cold when you were
>> under that tree or you would have hated trees.
>>
>> Essentially what you have done is mistaken your feelings
>> for the trees. It's curious that you could have so much
>> empathy for a tree when your own personal relations are
>> so poor. I suspect that is why you got a minor degree in
>> phycology, so you could figure out why you were different
>> from the norm and reconcile that some way.
>>
>> Instead you have grown up with poor interpersonal skills
>> and quite likely no good friends. Maybe you have a few
>> aquiantences but I suspect most of them give you lip
>> service and agree with because you are such a bore to
>> listen to when you argue.
>>
>> Anyway lucky for you the Internet came along so you could
>> invent the field of "Deep Ecology" and fool a few people
>> into thinking you had something to say. I bet you never
>> get invited to the same conference twice once they figure
>> out they have been had. You must of hated the FAQ that
>> bike folks had listed on you at one time because theses
>> same people could find it so easy and realized what hack
>> you were.
>>
>> That brings me to another lie. You have Dr's in Math and
>> a minor, I believe, in Psychology, yet, you present this
>> image on the WEB like you are some kind of Enviromental
>> Expert. Obviously this ruse doesn't work with the trained
>> enviromentalists and it's easy to see why. It's the old
>> stupid people don't know they are stupid syndrome. Your
>> writings on your website lack credibility because you
>> work off your own internal logic and don't use facts and
>> figures to support you "intuitive" claims.
>>
>> There is one good thing about you, though, you're more
>> interesting than some of the monosyllabic cut and pasters
>> in this forum, who can't seem to put a paragraph
>> together, but then that's not saying a lot, is it?
>
>I must say. Your paragraphs are astounding
Boy, I got sort of lazy there with the editing, whew! I
guess I was being too careful not to over invest in
Mikey Time.
<[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Mike, my boy, enough of this liar thing, there is no
>> bigger liar than you on this site. The Sierra club caught
>> you lying big time and barred you from holding office or
>> ever being a spokesman for their organization because on
>> numerous occasions you spewed forth your radical views
>> and represented yourself and the your positions as those
>> of the Sierra Club, knowing your were not a spokesman and
>> that your views were not shared by the club.
>>
>> The reason the took action against you is because your
>> lying was damaging the clubs reputation. Now that is not
>> harmless lying. Unlike the lying you claim goes on with
>> "all" mountain bikers which is mostly harmless and most
>> often just honest mistakes.
>>
>> Then there is the lie you perpetuate about your being
>> some kind of deep ecologist. What ****, the stuff you
>> write on your website is unsubstatiated nonsense. You say
>> you laid under a tree one fine day and it felt great. So
>> you suddenly start saying how great it is to be a tree
>> based on your feelings of being under it and euphoric. So
>> now you go around hugging trees and trying to save whip
>> snakes. Luckily it wasn't rainy and cold when you were
>> under that tree or you would have hated trees.
>>
>> Essentially what you have done is mistaken your feelings
>> for the trees. It's curious that you could have so much
>> empathy for a tree when your own personal relations are
>> so poor. I suspect that is why you got a minor degree in
>> phycology, so you could figure out why you were different
>> from the norm and reconcile that some way.
>>
>> Instead you have grown up with poor interpersonal skills
>> and quite likely no good friends. Maybe you have a few
>> aquiantences but I suspect most of them give you lip
>> service and agree with because you are such a bore to
>> listen to when you argue.
>>
>> Anyway lucky for you the Internet came along so you could
>> invent the field of "Deep Ecology" and fool a few people
>> into thinking you had something to say. I bet you never
>> get invited to the same conference twice once they figure
>> out they have been had. You must of hated the FAQ that
>> bike folks had listed on you at one time because theses
>> same people could find it so easy and realized what hack
>> you were.
>>
>> That brings me to another lie. You have Dr's in Math and
>> a minor, I believe, in Psychology, yet, you present this
>> image on the WEB like you are some kind of Enviromental
>> Expert. Obviously this ruse doesn't work with the trained
>> enviromentalists and it's easy to see why. It's the old
>> stupid people don't know they are stupid syndrome. Your
>> writings on your website lack credibility because you
>> work off your own internal logic and don't use facts and
>> figures to support you "intuitive" claims.
>>
>> There is one good thing about you, though, you're more
>> interesting than some of the monosyllabic cut and pasters
>> in this forum, who can't seem to put a paragraph
>> together, but then that's not saying a lot, is it?
>
>I must say. Your paragraphs are astounding
Boy, I got sort of lazy there with the editing, whew! I
guess I was being too careful not to over invest in
Mikey Time.
