T
Tom Keats
Guest
In article <GIilg.2483$Td6.569@trnddc08>,
"R Brickston" <[email protected]> writes:
>
> "Tom Keats" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> In article <Znhlg.2441$RU4.208@trnddc03>,
>> "R Brickston" <[email protected]> writes:
>>
>>>> And I don't see Bill (hi, Bill) as a narcissist. Maybe a little
>>>> approval-seeking, but what's wrong with that? At least I've never
>>>> seen Bill setting out unprovoked to intentionally hurt people.
>>>
>>> Of course you haven't, Bill's way to busy talking about Bill.
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>
>> So are you. But okay, be that way.
>>
>
> Not quite,
Quite.
> I merely posted some quotes
Why?
> with no commentary and later followed
> with the apropriate response in the spirit of rapartee when comments by
> others were made, like in any thread.
IOW you became defensive.
> You seem to want to convert this to a thread about myself and spin it into
> a negative.
No, I just don't want to see another incident of one person inciting
a bunch of people to gang up on and pick on another individual. It's
really ugly when that happens, because wolfpack psychology kicks in,
and people lose their humanity. I don't want anyone ganging up on
you, either. And this thread is already a negative from the start.
> I think perhaps you're the kind of person that feels bad for
> others you think are being misaligned, like your friend Baka.
Actually I feel bad for the misaligners.
> Get over it,
No, I cannot, will not and shall not.
> it's just words appearing on a computer screen
Words can have weight.
> and "poor" Bill will live to
> ride/drive/fly/fight/ and post again nary the worse for wear.
And no doubt you will live to be his self-appointed foil.
Fine. Just please don't try to assemble an army against your
enemy (Bill) by making a public example of him, in hopes of
others jumping onto your foolish bandwagon.
--
-- Nothing is safe from me.
Above address is just a spam midden.
I'm really at: tkeats [curlicue] vcn [point] bc [point] ca
"R Brickston" <[email protected]> writes:
>
> "Tom Keats" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> In article <Znhlg.2441$RU4.208@trnddc03>,
>> "R Brickston" <[email protected]> writes:
>>
>>>> And I don't see Bill (hi, Bill) as a narcissist. Maybe a little
>>>> approval-seeking, but what's wrong with that? At least I've never
>>>> seen Bill setting out unprovoked to intentionally hurt people.
>>>
>>> Of course you haven't, Bill's way to busy talking about Bill.
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>
>> So are you. But okay, be that way.
>>
>
> Not quite,
Quite.
> I merely posted some quotes
Why?
> with no commentary and later followed
> with the apropriate response in the spirit of rapartee when comments by
> others were made, like in any thread.
IOW you became defensive.
> You seem to want to convert this to a thread about myself and spin it into
> a negative.
No, I just don't want to see another incident of one person inciting
a bunch of people to gang up on and pick on another individual. It's
really ugly when that happens, because wolfpack psychology kicks in,
and people lose their humanity. I don't want anyone ganging up on
you, either. And this thread is already a negative from the start.
> I think perhaps you're the kind of person that feels bad for
> others you think are being misaligned, like your friend Baka.
Actually I feel bad for the misaligners.
> Get over it,
No, I cannot, will not and shall not.
> it's just words appearing on a computer screen
Words can have weight.
> and "poor" Bill will live to
> ride/drive/fly/fight/ and post again nary the worse for wear.
And no doubt you will live to be his self-appointed foil.
Fine. Just please don't try to assemble an army against your
enemy (Bill) by making a public example of him, in hopes of
others jumping onto your foolish bandwagon.
--
-- Nothing is safe from me.
Above address is just a spam midden.
I'm really at: tkeats [curlicue] vcn [point] bc [point] ca