shming123 said:
I just would like to know about tires in general, basically the needs of criterium racing, and some road racing. For crits, what is recommended? are slick tires better, or ones with some grips on the sides? wider or skinnier tires? 700x25? 700x21 or 22? Also, whats better; tubulars or clinchers. In order to get tubulars, i need to get different wheels, right? Are there any advantages of tubulars? All the info you can give me is great, thanks.
I'm a good source of extremely general info when it comes to tires -- nothing proven or scientific here, take note. Firstly, slicker tires are
generally considered faster, conditions permitting. That said, within certain limits, some grain, texture, or tread isn't uncommon on even the fanciest racing tires; there are bound to be subtle differences in how different rubbers corner or perform on different road types, but they're hard to quantify. It's going to depend on the rider, and on the road. Buy a reputable racing tire for racing, and see what the road tells you.
Secondly, there's a complex technical debate about which widths of road racing tire roll the fastest -- several publications insist the physics support slightly wider tires (23s, 25s) offering less rolling resistance than thinner variations. I'm not sure, myself; I'm not a race engineer. More easily quatifiable is weight -- wider options weigh a few grams more, naturally. Not a big deal. In the end, unless you've got a deep preference for either of the extremes, or your coach pushes you one way, 23s are a safe bet for most folks.
Finally, tubulars and clinchers are, as you suspect, different tire types requiring different wheels. Basic racing wisdom insists that tubulars are better riding all-around -- faster, better feeling, better cornering, and so on. This has been, in my opinion, generally true for a long time, but here's the thing: clincher technology has greatly improved over time, and today, the performance gap is quite narrow. More and more pros use clinchers more and more often. More importantly, though, clinchers tend to be much cheaper, and most cyclists consider them a whole lot easier to repair and replace.
What's the difference? Clinchers are what most folks think of when they think of a bike tire. They're a sturdy rubber casing which envelops a lightweight tube (the actual air bladder), and is wedged against the inner rims of the wheel, held there by a tight wire (called the
bead) and air pressure. Tubulars, by contrast, are a self-contained, one-piece hoop; think of a garden hose wrapped around a bike rim. The tube is integrated (traditionally sewn) into the rubber casing, which is why tubulars are often called "sew-ups." A tubular wheel doesn't have the same trough-and-lip rim; rather, it's just got a scooped-out hollow where the tire sits, held by glue.
You glue the suckers on yourself.
The (ever fading) rule of thumb says clinchers are an all-purpose invention, and tubulars are strictly for racing, or serious, serious training or rec riding. Do, of course, whatever the heck you like with your tires, so long as it suites you.