Something must be done... this is something...



Peter Allen wrote:
> http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/09/n...&en=1b27db938424d6bd&ei=5094&partner=homepage
>
> Someone hasn't thought this one through.
>
> I might even be in agreement with Brink here.

This is EXACTLY the reason we of the firearms fraternity oppose ALL
firearms registration programs. "They" always say, "don't worry, we'll
just keep these records in case your gun gets used in a crime or
something" and then, The Government, for whatever reason they choose,
comes knocking on your door, demanding your guns.

I hate/love when they prove us right.

David
 
On 9 Sep 2005 04:39:46 -0700, "David Cohen" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>This is EXACTLY the reason we of the firearms fraternity oppose ALL
>firearms registration programs. "They" always say, "don't worry, we'll
>just keep these records in case your gun gets used in a crime or
>something" and then, The Government, for whatever reason they choose,
>comes knocking on your door, demanding your guns.
>
>I hate/love when they prove us right.

Hey arsewipe,
Why would you have a problem with them confiscating guns there? The
morons like you, are shooting at cops, rescue workers, and national
guard. Don't you think that's good enough reason to confiscate
weapons? Registration is a smart thing, so I understand completely why
you don't understand the concept. BTW dumbazz, those "registrartion
records" that scare you so bad, they were likely destroyed in the
flood too.
TBR

"As democracy is perfected, the office of president represents, more and
more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day
the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last and the
White House will be adorned by a downright moron."
H.L. Mencken (1880 - 1956)
"Anyone with degrees from Yale and Harvard is presumed to be intelligent,
but George W. Bush has managed to overcome that presumption."
 
In article <[email protected]>,
"David Cohen" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Peter Allen wrote:
> > http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/09/national/nationalspecial/09storm.html?hp&e
> > x=1126324800&en=1b27db938424d6bd&ei=5094&partner=homepage
> >
> > Someone hasn't thought this one through.
> >
> > I might even be in agreement with Brink here.
>
> This is EXACTLY the reason we of the firearms fraternity oppose ALL
> firearms registration programs. "They" always say, "don't worry, we'll
> just keep these records in case your gun gets used in a crime or
> something" and then, The Government, for whatever reason they choose,
> comes knocking on your door, demanding your guns.
>
> I hate/love when they prove us right.

From another article:

"No civilians in New Orleans will be allowed to carry pistols, shotguns,
or other firearms, said P. Edwin Compass, the superintendent of police.
"Only law enforcement are allowed to have weapons," he said."

However:

"But that order apparently does not apply to the hundreds of security
guards whom businesses and some wealthy individuals have hired to
protect their property. The guards, who are civilians working for
private security firms like Blackwater, are openly carrying M-16's and
other assault rifles. Mr. Compass said he was aware of the private
guards, but that the police had no plans to make them give up their
weapons."

As always the wealthy are protected, the poor are left to fend for
themselves, and that's exactly what the 2D Amend attempts to prevent and
always why registration = confiscation. Always.

--
Will Brink @ http://www.brinkzone.com/
 
WillBrink wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>,
> "David Cohen" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Peter Allen wrote:
>>> http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/09/national/nationalspecial/09storm.html?hp&e
>>> x=1126324800&en=1b27db938424d6bd&ei=5094&partner=homepage
>>>
>>> Someone hasn't thought this one through.
>>>
>>> I might even be in agreement with Brink here.
>>
>> This is EXACTLY the reason we of the firearms fraternity oppose ALL
>> firearms registration programs. "They" always say, "don't worry,
>> we'll just keep these records in case your gun gets used in a crime
>> or something" and then, The Government, for whatever reason they
>> choose, comes knocking on your door, demanding your guns.
>>
>> I hate/love when they prove us right.
>
> From another article:
>
> "No civilians in New Orleans will be allowed to carry pistols,
> shotguns, or other firearms, said P. Edwin Compass, the
> superintendent of police. "Only law enforcement are allowed to have
> weapons," he said."
>
> However:
>
> "But that order apparently does not apply to the hundreds of security
> guards whom businesses and some wealthy individuals have hired to
> protect their property. The guards, who are civilians working for
> private security firms like Blackwater, are openly carrying M-16's and
> other assault rifles. Mr. Compass said he was aware of the private
> guards, but that the police had no plans to make them give up their
> weapons."
>
> As always the wealthy are protected, the poor are left to fend for
> themselves, and that's exactly what the 2D Amend attempts to prevent
> and always why registration = confiscation. Always.

Somehow I think you have decided the govt. action is a bad idea for a
different reason to mine.

I'm worried that there will be a bunch of guys (like JH probably would if he
were in NO) who will stand up to the authorities coming to confiscate their
weapons and quote the law and refuse to give up their guns. Which would
create a shedload of trouble with said authorities being as jumpy as they
are.

Whereas you're seeing a vision of a big nasty policeman coming to remove
your penis extension.

Peter
 
Peter Allen wrote:
> WillBrink wrote:
> > "David Cohen" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Peter Allen wrote:
> >>> http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/09/national/nationalspecial/09storm.html?hp&e
> >>> x=1126324800&en=1b27db938424d6bd&ei=5094&partner=homepage
> >>>
> >>> Someone hasn't thought this one through.
> >>>
> >>> I might even be in agreement with Brink here.
> >>
> >> This is EXACTLY the reason we of the firearms fraternity oppose ALL
> >> firearms registration programs. "They" always say, "don't worry,
> >> we'll just keep these records in case your gun gets used in a crime
> >> or something" and then, The Government, for whatever reason they
> >> choose, comes knocking on your door, demanding your guns.
> >>
> >> I hate/love when they prove us right.
> >
> > From another article:
> >
> > "No civilians in New Orleans will be allowed to carry pistols,
> > shotguns, or other firearms, said P. Edwin Compass, the
> > superintendent of police. "Only law enforcement are allowed to have
> > weapons," he said."
> >
> > However:
> >
> > "But that order apparently does not apply to the hundreds of security
> > guards whom businesses and some wealthy individuals have hired to
> > protect their property. The guards, who are civilians working for
> > private security firms like Blackwater, are openly carrying M-16's and
> > other assault rifles. Mr. Compass said he was aware of the private
> > guards, but that the police had no plans to make them give up their
> > weapons."
> >
> > As always the wealthy are protected, the poor are left to fend for
> > themselves, and that's exactly what the 2D Amend attempts to prevent
> > and always why registration = confiscation. Always.
>
> Somehow I think you have decided the govt. action is a bad idea for a
> different reason to mine.
>
> I'm worried that there will be a bunch of guys (like JH probably would if he
> were in NO) who will stand up to the authorities coming to confiscate their
> weapons and quote the law and refuse to give up their guns. Which would
> create a shedload of trouble with said authorities being as jumpy as they
> are.
>
> Whereas you're seeing a vision of a big nasty policeman coming to remove
> your penis extension.

Ohmigod, perish the thought.

What the HELL would I do with more than 10 inches? Jeez, man, special
order underwear?

David
 
In article <[email protected]>,
"Peter Allen" <[email protected]> wrote:

> WillBrink wrote:
> > In article <[email protected]>,
> > "David Cohen" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> Peter Allen wrote:
> >>> http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/09/national/nationalspecial/09storm.html?hp
> >>> &e
> >>> x=1126324800&en=1b27db938424d6bd&ei=5094&partner=homepage
> >>>
> >>> Someone hasn't thought this one through.
> >>>
> >>> I might even be in agreement with Brink here.
> >>
> >> This is EXACTLY the reason we of the firearms fraternity oppose ALL
> >> firearms registration programs. "They" always say, "don't worry,
> >> we'll just keep these records in case your gun gets used in a crime
> >> or something" and then, The Government, for whatever reason they
> >> choose, comes knocking on your door, demanding your guns.
> >>
> >> I hate/love when they prove us right.
> >
> > From another article:
> >
> > "No civilians in New Orleans will be allowed to carry pistols,
> > shotguns, or other firearms, said P. Edwin Compass, the
> > superintendent of police. "Only law enforcement are allowed to have
> > weapons," he said."
> >
> > However:
> >
> > "But that order apparently does not apply to the hundreds of security
> > guards whom businesses and some wealthy individuals have hired to
> > protect their property. The guards, who are civilians working for
> > private security firms like Blackwater, are openly carrying M-16's and
> > other assault rifles. Mr. Compass said he was aware of the private
> > guards, but that the police had no plans to make them give up their
> > weapons."
> >
> > As always the wealthy are protected, the poor are left to fend for
> > themselves, and that's exactly what the 2D Amend attempts to prevent
> > and always why registration = confiscation. Always.
>
> Somehow I think you have decided the govt. action is a bad idea for a
> different reason to mine.

I am sure that is true being I understand the issues here and you don't.
However, I fail to see then how your comments = "I might even be in
agreement with Brink here"

>
> I'm worried that there will be a bunch of guys (like JH probably would if he
> were in NO) who will stand up to the authorities coming to confiscate their
> weapons and quote the law

Ah, so the "authorities" should ignore the laws and those who stand up
for the law are the bad guys. Got it, thanx.

>and refuse to give up their guns. Which would
> create a shedload of trouble with said authorities being as jumpy as they
> are.
>
> Whereas you're seeing a vision of a big nasty policeman coming to remove
> your penis extension.

Got it. Wealthy people are always more important then poor people in
your view. Thanx.

--
Will Brink @ http://www.brinkzone.com/
 
The Bill Rodgers wrote:
> On 9 Sep 2005 04:39:46 -0700, "David Cohen" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> This is EXACTLY the reason we of the firearms fraternity oppose ALL
>> firearms registration programs. "They" always say, "don't worry,
>> we'll just keep these records in case your gun gets used in a crime
>> or something" and then, The Government, for whatever reason they
>> choose, comes knocking on your door, demanding your guns.
>>
>> I hate/love when they prove us right.
>
> Hey arsewipe,
> Why would you have a problem with them confiscating guns there? The
> morons like you, are shooting at cops, rescue workers, and national
> guard. Don't you think that's good enough reason to confiscate
> weapons? Registration is a smart thing, so I understand completely why
> you don't understand the concept. BTW dumbazz, those "registrartion
> records" that scare you so bad, they were likely destroyed in the
> flood too.
> TBR

What a moron. Have you never heard of a "database"? Or a "backup"? Man
you're stupid.
--
-Larry

"The troll hasn't been born who can troll us worse than we troll
ourselves." Hugh Beyer
 
On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 09:15:25 -0400, WillBrink
<WillBrink*NOSPAM*@Comcast.net> wrote:

>As always the wealthy are protected, the poor are left to fend for
>themselves, and that's exactly what the 2D Amend attempts to prevent and
>always why registration = confiscation. Always.

Another NRA moron. If you aren't smart enough to understand what's
going on there, then you are too irresponsible to caryy or own a gun.
TBR

"As democracy is perfected, the office of president represents, more and
more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day
the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last and the
White House will be adorned by a downright moron."
H.L. Mencken (1880 - 1956)
"Anyone with degrees from Yale and Harvard is presumed to be intelligent,
but George W. Bush has managed to overcome that presumption."
 
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005 14:49:20 +0100, "Peter Allen"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>I'm worried that there will be a bunch of guys (like JH probably would if he
>were in NO) who will stand up to the authorities coming to confiscate their
>weapons and quote the law and refuse to give up their guns. Which would
>create a shedload of trouble with said authorities being as jumpy as they
>are.
>
>Whereas you're seeing a vision of a big nasty policeman coming to remove
>your penis extension.

Trust me, idiots like Brink, and **** hanson would shoot at the cops
too, but they are still too stupid to understand.
TBR

"As democracy is perfected, the office of president represents, more and
more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day
the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last and the
White House will be adorned by a downright moron."
H.L. Mencken (1880 - 1956)
"Anyone with degrees from Yale and Harvard is presumed to be intelligent,
but George W. Bush has managed to overcome that presumption."
 
On 9 Sep 2005 07:04:48 -0700, "David Cohen" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>What the HELL would I do with more than 10 inches?

Stick it up yer ****?
TBR

"As democracy is perfected, the office of president represents, more and
more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day
the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last and the
White House will be adorned by a downright moron."
H.L. Mencken (1880 - 1956)
"Anyone with degrees from Yale and Harvard is presumed to be intelligent,
but George W. Bush has managed to overcome that presumption."
 
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005 07:47:52 -0700, "Larry Hodges"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>What a moron. Have you never heard of a "database"? Or a "backup"? Man
>you're stupid.

So what? If there's nothing wrong with registration, then there's no
problem.
TBR

"As democracy is perfected, the office of president represents, more and
more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day
the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last and the
White House will be adorned by a downright moron."
H.L. Mencken (1880 - 1956)
"Anyone with degrees from Yale and Harvard is presumed to be intelligent,
but George W. Bush has managed to overcome that presumption."
 
In article <[email protected]>,
"Peter Allen" <[email protected]> writes:
[snip]
>
> Whereas you're seeing a vision of a big nasty policeman coming to remove
> your penis extension.

That would be a nice troll were it not so hackneyed.

More likely, Will's issue is that the Government and rich people have
the right to defend themselves and their property (with M-16s, no
less!), while "average" and poor people do not. You don't see a
problem with this, eh Peter?

--
Jim Seymour | "It is wrong always, everywhere and
WARNING: The "From:" address is a | for everyone to believe anything upon
spam trap. DON'T USE IT! Use: | insufficient evidence."
[email protected] | - W. K. Clifford, ca. 1876
 
In article <[email protected]>,
"David Cohen" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Peter Allen wrote:
> > http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/09/national/nationalspecial/09storm.html?hp&e
> > x=1126324800&en=1b27db938424d6bd&ei=5094&partner=homepage
> >
> > Someone hasn't thought this one through.
> >
> > I might even be in agreement with Brink here.
>
> This is EXACTLY the reason we of the firearms fraternity oppose ALL
> firearms registration programs. "They" always say, "don't worry, we'll
> just keep these records in case your gun gets used in a crime or
> something" and then, The Government, for whatever reason they choose,
> comes knocking on your door, demanding your guns.
>
> I hate/love when they prove us right.
>
> David
>

That's why private sales are best..... ;-)
--
Om.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-*****." -Jack Nicholson
 
Dopey ******* wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>,
> "Peter Allen" <[email protected]> writes:
> [snip]
>>
>> Whereas you're seeing a vision of a big nasty policeman coming to
>> remove your penis extension.
>
> That would be a nice troll were it not so hackneyed.
>
> More likely, Will's issue is that the Government and rich people have
> the right to defend themselves and their property (with M-16s, no
> less!), while "average" and poor people do not. You don't see a
> problem with this, eh Peter?

Do you want me to quote the Hank standard Bu$h rant here? You're asking for
it.

I think it's a bad thing, I also think that the US govt. is not likely to do
something unconstitutional which inconveniences rich guys who will put a
high-powered lawyer in court. More to the point, the US govt. will not
generally do anything that inconveniences rich guys if they can help it;
offering special favours in return for election campaign money only goes so
far if you've already ****** off the people you want money from.

You could try electing the Democrats if you want to avoid that happening,
they will do exactly the same thing but with a sugar-coated spin.

Peter
 
In article <[email protected]>,
"Peter Allen" <[email protected]> writes:
> Dopey ******* wrote:
[snip]
>>
>> More likely, Will's issue is that the Government and rich people have
>> the right to defend themselves and their property (with M-16s, no
>> less!), while "average" and poor people do not. You don't see a
>> problem with this, eh Peter?
>
> Do you want me to quote the Hank standard Bu$h rant here? You're asking for
> it.

I think we can safely forgo that exercise :).

>
> I think it's a bad thing,

Glad to hear it.

> I also think that the US govt. is not likely to do
> something unconstitutional which inconveniences rich guys who will put a
> high-powered lawyer in court. More to the point, the US govt. will not
> generally do anything that inconveniences rich guys if they can help it;
> offering special favours in return for election campaign money only goes so
> far if you've already ****** off the people you want money from.
>
> You could try electing the Democrats if you want to avoid that happening,
> they will do exactly the same thing but with a sugar-coated spin.

I'm basically thoroughly disgusted with both parties, and have no
faith in either.

Anyway... What government has just done is the very thing it's
supposedly prohibited from doing by the 2nd Amendment. This should
pretty-much dispel any notion law-abiding U.S. citizens may've had
that their government, state, local or federal, has any respect for
their rights under the Constitution. What an incredibly stupid
thing to have done.

--
Jim Seymour | "It is wrong always, everywhere and
WARNING: The "From:" address is a | for everyone to believe anything upon
spam trap. DON'T USE IT! Use: | insufficient evidence."
[email protected] | - W. K. Clifford, ca. 1876
 
The Bill Rodgers <[email protected]> writes:

> On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 09:15:25 -0400, WillBrink
> <WillBrink*NOSPAM*@Comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>As always the wealthy are protected, the poor are left to fend for
>>themselves, and that's exactly what the 2D Amend attempts to prevent and
>>always why registration = confiscation. Always.
>
> Another NRA moron. If you aren't smart enough to understand what's
> going on there, then you are too irresponsible to caryy or own a
> gun. TBR
>

You're the moron. Things in New Orleans are bad enough that people
are paying ridiculous amounts of money for rent-a-cops with M-16s to
protect their property. Rich people aren't doing this because they
like rent-a-cops. They are doing it because they don't want to lose
their stuff. Meanwhile, the government is going around disarming law
abiding citizens. The rich people don't have to give up their guns,
and so their property will be safe. Everyone else will have to simply
take their chances.

Now, if it were possible to disarm everyone, then you might possibly
have a point. However, the criminal element isn't likely to give up
their weapons. Criminals are busy hiding their weapons. Heck,
they're busy holing up themselves waiting for the rest of the people
to be forcibly evacuated.

Jason
 
On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 18:48:54 -0600, Jason Earl <[email protected]>
wrote:

>Meanwhile, the government is going around disarming law
>abiding citizens.

Hey moron, "law abiding citizens" don't shoot at the police,
paramedics, or rescue workers. How the f**k can you be so fing stupid
to say such an ignorant thing? If they were law abiding, they wouldn't
be confiscating their weapons.
Fing moron.
TBR

"As democracy is perfected, the office of president represents, more and
more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day
the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last and the
White House will be adorned by a downright moron."
H.L. Mencken (1880 - 1956)
"Anyone with degrees from Yale and Harvard is presumed to be intelligent,
but George W. Bush has managed to overcome that presumption."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom Back