J
John Hanson
Guest
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 09:17:59 +0100, Charles <[email protected]> wrote in
misc.fitness.weights:
>On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 05:26:18 +0000 (UTC), [email protected] (Seth
>Breidbart) wrote:
>
>>In article <[email protected]>,
>>Charles <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>The carrying of weapons is a personal choice and nothing whatsoever to
>>>do with keeping governments in check. The most likely time Slippery is
>>>to pull his six-shooter, is if he carves someone up at the traffic
>>>lights and the rotten ******* threatens to punch out his lights.
>>>
>>>I doubt whether our ***** would leap out and smack him one back, he'd
>>>think this was a classic case of self defence, where he starts the
>>>trouble, someone offers to sort him out, and our Slippery thinks it's
>>>Dodge City - bang bang.
>>
>>MN passed a "must issue" (license to carry) law a few years ago, and a
>>lot of licenses have been issued under it. The number of licensed
>>carriers involved in such shooting incidents over traffic problems
>>here is how many? Oh, right, none.
>>
>>On the other hand, the state best known for road-rage shootings is
>>California, where carry licenses aren't easily available. Strange how
>>that works, isn't it?
>
>It's all quite alien to me Se th, given that I live in a country where
>if you drive like a ***** to the disadvantage of other road users, it
>is quite likely that someone will give you a smack alongside the ear.
Quite likely? ********! The argument could be made that you'd be
quite likely to receive a one finger salute.
>
>If you give a gun to "the person who is capable of driving like a
>***** to the disadvantage of other road users", it comes as no
>surprise to me Se th, that if someone takes exception to such
>behaviour that the ***** will pull his gun if anyone should attempt to
>point out the error of his ways.
Again you show your idiocy. A carry permit only allows one to carry a
firearm legally. It does NOT, allow that person to pull it.
>
>It doesn't make a very good case for the carrying of concealed weapons
>Se th, given that the last thing any of us want is a bullet up the
>**** for pointing out the error of his ways to some abrasive little
>road hog.
You're being an idiot.
misc.fitness.weights:
>On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 05:26:18 +0000 (UTC), [email protected] (Seth
>Breidbart) wrote:
>
>>In article <[email protected]>,
>>Charles <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>The carrying of weapons is a personal choice and nothing whatsoever to
>>>do with keeping governments in check. The most likely time Slippery is
>>>to pull his six-shooter, is if he carves someone up at the traffic
>>>lights and the rotten ******* threatens to punch out his lights.
>>>
>>>I doubt whether our ***** would leap out and smack him one back, he'd
>>>think this was a classic case of self defence, where he starts the
>>>trouble, someone offers to sort him out, and our Slippery thinks it's
>>>Dodge City - bang bang.
>>
>>MN passed a "must issue" (license to carry) law a few years ago, and a
>>lot of licenses have been issued under it. The number of licensed
>>carriers involved in such shooting incidents over traffic problems
>>here is how many? Oh, right, none.
>>
>>On the other hand, the state best known for road-rage shootings is
>>California, where carry licenses aren't easily available. Strange how
>>that works, isn't it?
>
>It's all quite alien to me Se th, given that I live in a country where
>if you drive like a ***** to the disadvantage of other road users, it
>is quite likely that someone will give you a smack alongside the ear.
Quite likely? ********! The argument could be made that you'd be
quite likely to receive a one finger salute.
>
>If you give a gun to "the person who is capable of driving like a
>***** to the disadvantage of other road users", it comes as no
>surprise to me Se th, that if someone takes exception to such
>behaviour that the ***** will pull his gun if anyone should attempt to
>point out the error of his ways.
Again you show your idiocy. A carry permit only allows one to carry a
firearm legally. It does NOT, allow that person to pull it.
>
>It doesn't make a very good case for the carrying of concealed weapons
>Se th, given that the last thing any of us want is a bullet up the
>**** for pointing out the error of his ways to some abrasive little
>road hog.
You're being an idiot.