miday said:So straight away I'd say this is a flawed test. Also it is produced by Cervelo - hardly going to be objective. Besides there is more than number s to a bike otherwise the numbers would correlate with sales. The facts here speak for themselves. If it were price alone the sales would suggest that Giant wins every time. Scott's reputation has not withstood the test of time when it comes to the CR. Cervello too has a reputation for lower quality joins. Specialized on the other hand has gone from strength to strngth. Some of theat due to very clever marketing. But I've ridden all the bikes I've mentioned and found the SL to be substancially better to ride and it feels fast. There own "independent" tests put them way in front as I suspect do most other makers.
You're obviously a Specialized fan. Even in the light of an independent test you're still virogously defending the Specialize.
Well, the test is not done by Cervelo, it was done by Velonews. Cervelo just happens to have it on their site because their bikes performed well.
And....it's not about the cervelo, since this thread is about the Trek, Scott or Specialzed. I'm merely pointing to the fact that the Scott came out better. Read the posts...I posted.
Sooooo your points are......moot.