Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

spider-web aerodynamics

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 5 posts · 504 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
20 June 2006
Last activity
21 June 2006
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
504
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. It's too hot at 100F for much of the wildlife that normally entertains
    me on my daily ride up the Arkansas River, apart from some quail that
    look even more confused than normal.

    But yesterday I noticed something odd in the natural world. When I
    turned and put the sun behind me, the light caught a single-strand
    spider-web running from my speedometer to my left brake hood.

    It survived the entire 15 mile ride, top speed 40.5 mph.

    Like everyone else, I know that a spider-web is immensely strong, but
    I'm still wondering if I should be surprised that it stood up to
    sustained winds over 35 mph on three descents.

    Webs are strong enough to catch insects, but they rely on numerous
    strands, not just one.

    The strand was finer (I think) than a human hair, which reduces wind
    drag considerably, but it was also about 8 inches long and laid
    sideways across the windstream, which should have increased wind drag
    quite a bit.

    While not as strong as the thicker human hair (which easily stands up
    to such breezes), the web strand was still strong enough not to snap
    in two in 40mph wind.

    I suppose what surprised me was that neither end broke loose, when the
    attachment points were so tiny.

    We all know that the silk itself is strong, but now I want to know
    just how good the glue at the end is. Maybe researchers should be
    trying to duplicate web-glue to replace tublar-tire cement instead of
    trying to use web-strands to replace silk and kevlar.

    Time to head out, having foolishly waited until the news announced
    that it's 103F this evening. I'm curious to see if the web is still
    there.

    Carl Fogel

  2. <[email hidden]> wrote: (clip) The strand was finer (I think) than a
    human hair, which reduces wind drag considerably, but it was also about 8
    inches long and laid sideways across the windstream, which should have
    increased wind drag quite a bit. (clip)
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    And you didn't notice any effect on your riding speed or pedaling effort?

  3. Leo Lichtman said:


    <[email hidden]> wrote: (clip) The strand was finer (I think) than a
    human hair, which reduces wind drag considerably, but it was also about 8
    inches long and laid sideways across the windstream, which should have
    increased wind drag quite a bit. (clip)
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    And you didn't notice any effect on your riding speed or pedaling effort?

    Dear Leo,

    Not even a Schwinn cyclocomputer reading in thousandths of a mile
    revealed the effect.

    But half an hour ago I noticed that the strand of spider web had
    affected a small midge or nymph, which was dangling at the end of an
    invisible tether in a 20 mph breeze, having collided with my single
    strand of spider web.

    (Possibly another example of a carbon part failing catastropihically
    instead of bending? Are spider-webs made of carbon?)

    Anyway, I assume that the luckless insect smacked into the middle of
    the strand and that the tremendous impact (on a spider-web scale) tore
    the leading end off my brake hood, dissipating enough energy in the
    procees that the end on my speedometer held.

    I pondered the midge or nymph's fate for about a mile, wondering if I
    should try to free it, but I couldn't even see the strand of spider
    web and realized that I couldn't possibly pull the insect free of the
    sticky strand, so I finally just brushed it off.

    I thought that the guy-lines, so to speak, weren't sticky and that a
    special fuzzy web was used to turn them into a trap, but evidently
    this single strand was sticky enough enough to hold a tiny insect
    helpless in a considerable wind.

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

  4. In article <[email hidden]>,

    () said:

    Like everyone else, I know that a spider-web is immensely strong, but
    I'm still wondering if I should be surprised that it stood up to
    sustained winds over 35 mph on three descents.


    [...]

    Quoted message said:

    I suppose what surprised me was that neither end broke loose, when the
    attachment points were so tiny.

    The area behind the glass on motorcar door mirrors make excellent
    nesting places for spiders, who will build their webs 'twixt mirror and
    door. These seem capable of staying in place at speeds of up to, er,
    rather more than is legally permitted by Her Majesty's Government...

    --
    Dave Larrington - <http://www.legslarry.beerdrinkers.co.uk/>
    My other motto is in Latin.

  5. [edit]

    Quoted message said:


    But half an hour ago I noticed that the strand of spider web had
    affected a small midge or nymph, which was dangling at the end of an
    invisible tether in a 20 mph breeze, having collided with my single
    strand of spider web.

    (Possibly another example of a carbon part failing catastropihically
    instead of bending? Are spider-webs made of carbon?)

    [edit]

    Quoted message said:

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

    I think spider silk is a protein, so a polymer. More ductile than a carbon
    fibre i think too.

    I'm sure the spider had installed the web without regard to the important
    warnings contained within the manual. Not a hope of getting it repaired
    under warranty.

    Skippy
    E&OE

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.