Stage 2: Mons - Charleroi Marcinelle, 197 km



Has it started yet? There's no coverage on cyclingnews.com yet.

-Bikeguy
 
tcklyde said:
Nice and flat, should be one for Petacchi.

Or McEwen. Petacchi hasn't got such a good lead-out train this year and McEwen has shown a bit of form with a win in TdeRomandie.
 
****..I didn`t tape the last half hour. I hope for highlights before tomorrow`s stage.
 
An interesting stage for a number of reasons : Milram looked pretty solid as a lead out team. They'd six of their riders all in formation in the last kilometre.
OK Petacchi didn't come through in the finish as the raod was an uphill drag.

Bettini tried to squeeze it but McEwen as ever was in the right place and paced himself nicely across the line.

Good win for Robbie.

The earlier part of the stage was interesting too. The big guns just rolled along in the pack.
Awful conditions early on.
 
limerickman said:
An interesting stage for a number of reasons : Milram looked pretty solid as a lead out team. They'd six of their riders all in formation in the last kilometre.
OK Petacchi didn't come through in the finish as the raod was an uphill drag.

Bettini tried to squeeze it but McEwen as ever was in the right place and paced himself nicely across the line.

Good win for Robbie.

The earlier part of the stage was interesting too. The big guns just rolled along in the pack.
Awful conditions early on.
But somehow Petacchi isn't that strong this year (Get-Wevelgem, last week a very starnge move during Henninger Turm in frankfurt)...
 
Milram was solid but Petacchi missed something. It was 200m from the finish that Pollack begun the decisive move and still Alex hadn't started his move yet. McEwen deserves extra credit by the cycling world because he wins without having a "train" specifically for him to produce his sprint. He adapts easily.
 
Dimos said:
Milram was solid but Petacchi missed something. It was 200m from the finish that Pollack begun the decisive move and still Alex hadn't started his move yet. McEwen deserves extra credit by the cycling world because he wins without having a "train" specifically for him to produce his sprint. He adapts easily.

Good point.
McEwen was tracking Petacchi up to the last 500 metres.
I think he only had one other Lotto rider with him.

Pollack looked really strong at the finish but you're correct Robbie dserves a lot of credit/respect.
 
Dimos said:
Milram was solid but Petacchi missed something. It was 200m from the finish that Pollack begun the decisive move and still Alex hadn't started his move yet. McEwen deserves extra credit by the cycling world because he wins without having a "train" specifically for him to produce his sprint. He adapts easily.

Like he says in interview in cycling news, he's been sprinting at this level for 11 years. Most of those years he's had to be an opportunist. You'd have to say he's fairly successful.
 
mitosis said:
Like he says in interview in cycling news, he's been sprinting at this level for 11 years. Most of those years he's had to be an opportunist.
He has phenomenal instincts as well. He's one of my favorite riders to watch. no one knows where he is half the time until the last few kilometers.

This months Cycle Sport America has a great write-up on him in the "At Home" section, it's called "Doctor Jekyll and Mr. Hyde.

lw
 

Similar threads