Statistics for alt.mountain-bike



Status
Not open for further replies.
A

Am-B Stats

Guest
============================================================================
Analysis of posts to alt.mountain-bike
============================================================================
(stats compiled with a script by Garry Knight)

Total posts considered: 1,258 over 7 days Earliest article: Mon Sep 22 22:46:10 2003 Latest article:
Mon Sep 29 20:12:56 2003 Original articles: 100, replies: 1,158 Total size of posts: 2,338,700 bytes
(2,283K) (2.23M) Average 179 articles per day, 0.32 MB per day, 1,859 bytes per article Total
headers: 1,197 KB bodies: 1,086 KB Body text - quoted: 497 KB, original: 539 KB = 52.01%, sigs: 47
KB Total number of posters: 213, average 10,979 bytes per poster Total number of threads: 165,
average 14,173 bytes per thread Total number of User-Agents: 26

============================================================================
Top 20 posters by number of articles
============================================================================
1: Dave W <[email protected]>...................................... : 100
2: [email protected] (Stephen Baker)....................... : 85
3: "Shaun Rimmer" <[email protected]>......................... : 82
4: "Penny S" <[email protected]>....................... : 44
5: bomba <[email protected]>.................................. : 33
6: "Sorni" <[email protected]>............................. : 32
7: [email protected] (JD)........................................... : 31
8: BB <[email protected]>............................... : 29
9: Super Slinky <[email protected]>.......................... : 27
10: "Carla A-G" <[email protected]>........................... : 26
11: "Michael Dart" <[email protected]>.............................. : 24
12: "Slacker" <[email protected]>............................. : 23
13: "Raoul Deluxe" <[email protected]>......................... : 23
14: "spademan o---[\) *" <[email protected]>...... : 23
15: "Westie" <[email protected]>......................... : 18
16: "MattB" <[email protected]>................................. : 17
17: ireman_1 <[email protected]>.................................. : 16
18: Anthony Sloan <[email protected]>................... : 14
19: [email protected]............................................ : 14
20: [email protected] (Corvus Corvax)......................... : 14

============================================================================
Top 20 posters by article size in Kbytes
============================================================================
21: "Shaun Rimmer" <[email protected]>......................... : 166
22: Dave W <[email protected]>...................................... : 161
23: [email protected] (Stephen Baker)....................... : 80
24: "Penny S" <[email protected]>....................... : 79
25: "Sorni" <[email protected]>............................. : 59
26: Super Slinky <[email protected]>.......................... : 58
27: "Raoul Deluxe" <[email protected]>......................... : 53
28: [email protected] (JD)........................................... : 49
29: "Michael Dart" <[email protected]>.............................. : 47
30: bomba <[email protected]>.................................. : 46
31: Tlacatecatl <[email protected]>.......................... : 43
32: "Carla A-G" <[email protected]>........................... : 39
33: "spademan o---[\) *" <[email protected]>...... : 39
34: "Westie" <[email protected]>......................... : 38
35: BB <[email protected]>............................... : 37
36: "Slacker" <[email protected]>............................. : 36
37: ireman_1 <[email protected]>.................................. : 34
38: floody <[email protected]>........................ : 33
39: [email protected] (Paladin).................................... : 31
40: "MattB" <[email protected]>................................. : 31

============================================================================
Top 20 responders by original text (> 5 posts)
============================================================================
41: floody <[email protected]>........................ : 83.09%
42: "John Morgan" <[email protected]>........................ : 81.43%
43: Tlacatecatl <[email protected]>.......................... : 76.78%
44: Super Slinky <[email protected]>.............................. : 76.03%
45: "Carla A-G" <[email protected]>........................... : 72.42%
46: "SDC" <[email protected]>................................... : 71.19%
47: BB <[email protected]>............................... : 69.34%
48: "MattB" <[email protected]>................................. : 68.84%
49: "(Pete Cresswell)" <[email protected]>..................................... : 66.66%
50: gabrielle <[email protected]>....................... : 64.72%
51: Doug Taylor <[email protected]>....................... : 64.52%
52: Pete Jones <[email protected]>......................... : 64.36%
53: "Zilla" <[email protected]>........................... : 62.38%
54: "Rich Touart" <[email protected]>............................. : 61.69%
55: ismlv <[email protected]>........................................ : 61.07%
56: B a r r y B u r k e J r . <Keep_it_in_the_newsgroup_please@aol. : 61.05%
57: "John Harlow" <[email protected]>........................... : 58.37%
58: ireman_1 <[email protected]>.................................. : 57.25%
59: [email protected] (Stephen Baker)....................... : 57.20%
60: [email protected] (Corvus Corvax)......................... : 56.41%

============================================================================
Bottom 20 responders by original text (> 5 posts)
============================================================================
61: [email protected] (MTBScottie)................................ : 8.70%
62: Shawn Curry <[email protected]>....... : 13.96%
63: "Mr. E. Mann" <[email protected]>............................... : 19.08%
64: J'm Sm'th <[email protected]>.................. : 20.67%
65: Bill Wheeler <[email protected]>..................... : 23.07%
66: "Slacker" <[email protected]>............................. : 26.26%
67: Chris Phillipo <[email protected]>................. : 28.35%
68: "Raoul Deluxe" <[email protected]>......................... : 33.53%
69: [email protected] (The Ogre)................................. : 33.83%
70: bomba <[email protected]>.................................. : 34.46%
71: "Michael Dart" <[email protected]>.............................. : 35.83%
72: [email protected] (Andrew Thorne)................... : 35.95%
73: P e t e F a g e r l i n <[email protected]>.............. : 36.03%
74: Dave W <[email protected]>...................................... : 36.78%
75: "Shaun Rimmer" <[email protected]>......................... : 39.96%
76: "Sorni" <[email protected]>............................. : 40.57%
77: Craig Brossman <[email protected]>.................... : 40.60%
78: "Doug Taylor" <[email protected]>......................... : 41.16%
79: "Cameron" <[email protected]>........................ : 41.34%
80: "Jon Bond" <[email protected]>..................... : 41.64%

============================================================================
Top 20 threads by no. of articles
============================================================================
81: Horst on suspension: Old School or New?........................ : 80
82: OT rant aargh!................................................. : 44
83: shock jocks and bikes.......................................... : 38
84: Gone freeriding................................................ : 38
85: Im a Coloradodo!............................................... : 37
86: Official Poetry Contest Thread................................. : 31
87: Freeriding..................................................... : 31
88: Long OT Reply to OT Reply to OT Rant........................... : 30
89: Midnight at The AM-Bar #84..................................... : 24
90: World record notification...................................... : 24
91: Another Quiz................................................... : 23
92: 29ers.......................................................... : 23
93: Where there's a buck........................................... : 22
94: Anyone ridden a Giant VT?...................................... : 21
95: Any Belgian riders out here?................................... : 19
96: Go Bro'!....................................................... : 18
97: Hanging Bike................................................... : 17
98: The Devil went Down to GA...................................... : 17
99: Your avg. ride length or time?................................. : 17
100: Headset Walkie Talkies (recommendations requested)............. : 16

============================================================================
Top 20 threads by size in KB
============================================================================
101: Horst on suspension: Old School or New?........................ : 148
102: Long OT Reply to OT Reply to OT Rant........................... : 110
103: OT rant aargh!................................................. : 81
104: shock jocks and bikes.......................................... : 68
105: Im a Coloradodo!............................................... : 66
106: Another Quiz................................................... : 60
107: Freeriding..................................................... : 60
108: Gone freeriding................................................ : 55
109: World record notification...................................... : 42
110: 29ers.......................................................... : 41
111: Where there's a buck........................................... : 41
112: Official Poetry Contest Thread................................. : 40
113: Anyone ridden a Giant VT?...................................... : 36
114: Technical Uphills.............................................. : 31
115: Is this a great sport or what?................................. : 31
116: Stock tip for JD............................................... : 30
117: Midnight at The AM-Bar #84..................................... : 29
118: The Devil went Down to GA...................................... : 28
119: Any Belgian riders out here?................................... : 28
120: Your avg. ride length or time?................................. : 27

============================================================================
Top 6 cross-posted groups
============================================================================
121: uk.rec.cycling................................................. : 22
122: rec.bicycles.tech.............................................. : 8
123: ca.environment................................................. : 2
124: sci.environment................................................ : 2
125: rec.backcountry................................................ : 2
126: rec.bicycles.off-road.......................................... : 1

============================================================================
Top 10 User Agents by poster
============================================================================
127: Outlook Express................................................ : 96
128: Unknown........................................................ : 38
129: Mozilla........................................................ : 19
130: Forte Agent.................................................... : 14
131: [email protected]................................. : 8
132: slrn........................................................... : 6
133: Pan............................................................ : 5
134: Forte Free Agent............................................... : 5
135: MicroPlanet Gravity............................................ : 4
136: Xnews.......................................................... : 4

============================================================================
Top 10 User Agents by number of posts
============================================================================
137: Outlook Express........................................... : 558 (44%)
138: Forte Free Agent.......................................... : 111 ( 9%)
139: AOL....................................................... : 108 ( 9%)
140: http://groups.google.com/................................. : 105 ( 8%)
141: Mozilla................................................... : 99 ( 8%)
142: Forte Agent............................................... : 79 ( 6%)
143: slrn...................................................... : 46 ( 4%)
144: MicroPlanet Gravity....................................... : 41 ( 3%)
145: [email protected]............................ : 41 ( 3%)
146: Pan....................................................... : 20 ( 2%)

============================================================================
Top 10 time zones
============================================================================
147: UTC............................................................ : 390
148: -0700.......................................................... : 253
149: -0400.......................................................... : 225
150: +0100.......................................................... : 144
151: +0200.......................................................... : 57
152: -0500.......................................................... : 51
153: +0950.......................................................... : 41
154: -0600.......................................................... : 35
155: +1200.......................................................... : 18
156: -0400 (EDT).................................................... : 14

============================================================================
--

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This was auto-posted using a script by Garry Knight. Please send questions or comments to
[email protected].
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
> Top 10 User Agents by poster
>============================================================================
>1: Outlook Express................................................ : 96
>2: Unknown........................................................ : 38
>3: Mozilla........................................................ : 19
>4: Forte Agent.................................................... : 14
>5: [email protected]................................. : 8
>6: slrn........................................................... : 6
>7: Pan............................................................ : 5
>8: Forte Free Agent............................................... : 5
>9: MicroPlanet Gravity............................................ : 4
>10: Xnews.......................................................... : 4
>

Woohoo! slrn doubles its a.m-b users!

--
monique
 
"Monique Y. Herman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> > Top 10 User Agents by poster
>
>===========================================================================
=
> > 1: Outlook Express................................................ :
96
> > 2: Unknown........................................................ :
38
> > 3: Mozilla........................................................ :
19
> > 4: Forte Agent.................................................... :
14
> > 5: [email protected]................................. :
8
> > 6: slrn........................................................... :
6
> > 7: Pan............................................................ :
5
> > 8: Forte Free Agent............................................... :
5
> > 9: MicroPlanet Gravity............................................ :
4
> > 10: Xnews.......................................................... :
4
> >
>
>
> Woohoo! slrn doubles its a.m-b users!
>
Has anyone nym shifted?
 
"Raoul Deluxe" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Monique Y. Herman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > > Top 10 User Agents by poster
> >
>
>===========================================================================
> =
> > > 1: Outlook Express................................................ :
> 96
> > > 2: Unknown........................................................ :
> 38
> > > 3: Mozilla........................................................ :
> 19
> > > 4: Forte Agent.................................................... :
> 14
> > > 5: [email protected]................................. :
> 8
> > > 6: slrn........................................................... :
> 6
> > > 7: Pan............................................................ :
> 5
> > > 8: Forte Free Agent............................................... :
> 5
> > > 9: MicroPlanet Gravity............................................ :
> 4
> > > 10: Xnews.......................................................... :
> 4
> > >
> >
> >
> > Woohoo! slrn doubles its a.m-b users!
> >
> Has anyone nym shifted?
>

I don't think so, but then I use a real good seat.

Mike
 
AM-B Stats <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<11483.00.39.10721leafnode@getafix>...
> ============================================================================
> Top 20 posters by number of articles
> ============================================================================
> 1: Dave W <[email protected]>...................................... : 100

An all-time low in am-b for sure. One hundred leg humpings in a week is just plain pathetic. Grease
those tweezers, clean the lens on that microscope, and load the bong frightpig. It's going to be a
long week for you.

JD
 
On 30 Sep 2003 12:07:51 -0700, [email protected] (JD) wrote:

>AM-B Stats <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<11483.00.39.10721leafnode@getafix>...
>> ============================================================================
>> Top 20 posters by number of articles
>> ============================================================================
>> 1: Dave W <[email protected]>...................................... : 100

I remember telling you I wasn't going anywhere a very long while back. Seems I was correct, and you
can't do anything about it. N'eer! pppfffftttt!

>
>An all-time low in am-b for sure.

Perhaps that will be your cue to shovel your **** elsewhere then...

But you can leave the pics, those are nice.

>One hundred leg humpings in a week is just plain pathetic.

Looks like you also have but 2 choices: stay mad, or get over it...oh, wait, there is a third. Go
somewhere else. hehehehehe

> Grease those tweezers, clean the lens on that microscope, and load the bong frightpig. It's going
> to be a long week for you.
>
>JD

Smoke free for a while now JD. find something else to ***** an complain about, cuz that one is
falling on deaf ears. As about all your starching of my cuffs tend to do. (Sorry for the Blatant
JD'ism Shauny, but it works here pretty well.)

Dave (in for the long haul....you?)
 
OH I'm in the top 20 posters. Coming in at 19. Well I've got time that is organized.
Posting,riding,working 2 jobs,ect. Even find time to work on my bikes. Just upgraded the streetster
GT with V brakes had sitting in a box in the bike room. Those Canti's were just one hell to adjust.
Everythng,even those FAST ware Shimano brake pads.

Fire up MTB 03
 
Dave Wimp <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:<[email protected]>...
> As about all your starching of my cuffs tend to do.

I prefer to call my responses to your lameness the occasional "kick the stupid car-chasing dog in
the ass", whereas your post humping is a perpetual motion of stupidity. Consider yourself kicked for
a while again.

JD
 
"Dave W" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...

> Smoke free for a while now JD. find something else to ***** an complain about, cuz that one is
> falling on deaf ears. As about all your starching of my cuffs tend to do. (Sorry for the Blatant
> JD'ism Shauny, but it works here pretty well.)

Idiot.

> Dave (in the deep holel....you?)

Shaun aRe
 
On 30 Sep 2003 22:44:18 -0700, ********@Ieatfeces.com (JustaDick head) wrote:

>Dave Wimp <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:<[email protected]>...
>> As about all your starching of my cuffs tend to do.
>
>I prefer to call my responses to your lameness the occasional "kick the stupid car-chasing dog in
>the ass", whereas your post humping is a perpetual motion of stupidity. Consider yourself kicked
>for a while again.
>
>JD

Here we go. Hey Baker, don't forget to add this post to you little "post of the year" award k?

Hey look JD has learned a new word. JD, tell me, what does "perpetual" mean? I mean, it obvious you
can now spell it, and I assume you can pronounce it. As long as your teeth (or lack theroff) doesn't
prohibit the correct pronunciation.

Dave (uggha, ugga<caveman speak!)
 
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 13:34:53 +0100, "Shaun Rimmer" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>"Dave W" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
>
>> Smoke free for a while now JD. find something else to ***** an complain about, cuz that one is
>> falling on deaf ears. As about all your starching of my cuffs tend to do. (Sorry for the Blatant
>> JD'ism Shauny, but it works here pretty well.)
>
>Idiot.
>
>> Dave (in the deep holel....you?)
>
>
>Shaun aRe
>

hey Shauny wahts a holel?
 
On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 10:58:54 -0400, Dave W <[email protected]> wrote:

>Hey look JD has learned a new word. JD, tell me, what does
"perpetual"
>mean? I mean, it obvious you can now spell it, and I assume you can pronounce it. As long as your
>teeth (or lack theroff) doesn't
prohibit
>the correct pronunciation.

So, what's the schedule for the next time that you're going to "get over" JD?

"Hey PETEY, in case you haven't been paying attention me and the mountain god don't engage each
other any longer."

ROTFLMAO.

pete fagerlin

::Revolutionary! Evolutionary! Yet so retro! :www.yestubes.com
 
On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 08:47:29 -0700, P e t e F a g e r l i n <[email protected]> wrote:

>On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 10:58:54 -0400, Dave W <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>Hey look JD has learned a new word. JD, tell me, what does
>"perpetual"
>>mean? I mean, it obvious you can now spell it, and I assume you can pronounce it. As long as your
>>teeth (or lack theroff) doesn't
>prohibit
>>the correct pronunciation.

Damn Pete, you jumped in quicker than I thought you would, but rest assured I, counted on it, so
predicatble! Now for a few questions.
>
>So, what's the schedule for the next time that you're going to "get over" JD?

>
>"Hey PETEY, in case you haven't been paying attention me and the mountain god don't engage each
>other any longer."

Never said I wouldn't again though. Whattsamatta Petey, did I hurt your feelings by engaging in some
snappy banter, what are you jealous? I mean I'll be glad to through some love your way, as it
obvious you feel left out.

>
>ROTFLMAO.

As I am at you, it didn't take you five minutes to add you worthless 2 cent did it. Tell us Petey,
exactly what are your issues with he and I snapping around the news group? Sure go ahead and point
at any direction you like, but there must be some deep underlying meaning here.

Dave (I'm sure there are others, but sorry, Petey beat you too it!)
 
On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 12:05:09 -0400, Dave W <[email protected]> wrote:

>On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 08:47:29 -0700, P e t e F a g e r l i n

>>So, what's the schedule for the next time that you're going to "get over" JD?
>

No problems, just still laughing at your antics.

>>"Hey PETEY, in case you haven't been paying attention me and the mountain god don't engage each
>>other any longer."
>
>Never said I wouldn't again though. Whattsamatta Petey, did I hurt your feelings by engaging in
>some snappy banter, what are you
jealous?

Jealous of a dimwit like you? Please.

>I mean I'll be glad to through some love your way, as it obvious you feel left out.

Have you been drinking, again? That's the only logical explanation for your behavior.

>>ROTFLMAO.
>
>As I am at you, it didn't take you five minutes to add you worthless
2
>cent did it.

So, if it was worthless, why did you spend so much time replying hypocrite? You're too, too easy.

Tell us Petey, exactly what are your issues with he and I
>snapping around the news group?

No issues. Hypocrites make me laugh, hence my reply, again. You're a little hypocritical broken
record with no self-control and extreme self-esteem problems, when your entire posting history is
taken into account.

Sure go ahead and point at any
>direction you like, but there must be some deep underlying meaning here.

Humor. And it's not underlying. It's sitting right out there for all to see kind of like the
guy that walks back into the bar from the bathroom with ****-stained TP hanging out of his
droopy drawers.

Sound familiar?

pete fagerlin

::Revolutionary! Evolutionary! Yet so retro! :www.yestubes.com
 
On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 09:41:12 -0700, P e t e F a g e r l i n <[email protected]> wrote:

>On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 12:05:09 -0400, Dave W <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 08:47:29 -0700, P e t e F a g e r l i n
>
>>>So, what's the schedule for the next time that you're going to "get over" JD?
>>

>
>No problems, just still laughing at your antics.

Glad to hear it. As I am at your obvious jealousy. Sorry didn't mean to hurt your or your
girlfriends feelings.
>
>>>"Hey PETEY, in case you haven't been paying attention me and the mountain god don't engage each
>>>other any longer."
>>
>>Never said I wouldn't again though. Whattsamatta Petey, did I hurt your feelings by engaging in
>>some snappy banter, what are you
>jealous?
>
>Jealous of a dimwit like you? Please.

No need to beg Petey, I can throw some your way if you really need me too, and it's obvious you do.
>
>>I mean I'll be glad to through some love your way, as it obvious you feel left out.
>
>Have you been drinking, again? That's the only logical explanation for your behavior.

hahaha, nope clear as a bell, hell it's just now past noon here on the beast coast. You may like to
toddle a few b-4 lunch but not I.
>
>>>ROTFLMAO.
>>
>>As I am at you, it didn't take you five minutes to add you worthless
>2
>>cent did it.
>
>So, if it was worthless, why did you spend so much time replying hypocrite? You're too, too easy.

Took about 30 seconds, and besides your need to be held was just too obvious.There there. It'll be
o.k Petey. Really it will. There there.
>
> Tell us Petey, exactly what are your issues with he and I
>>snapping around the news group?
>
>No issues.

Really? I don't believe you

>Hypocrites make me laugh, hence my reply, again.

As they do me. Like I said, bet you have a blast at family reunions.

> You're a little hypocritical broken record with no self-control and extreme self-esteem problems,
> when your entire posting history is taken into account.

Waaa waaa, booo hoo. Someone's hurt poor Petey's feelings. Would you like a little cheese with that
whine? Mommy, make the hypocrite Dave leave me and my girlfriend alone...he scares me. puhleeze!

>
>Sure go ahead and point at any
>>direction you like, but there must be some deep underlying meaning here.
>
>Humor. And it's not underlying.

You call that humor do you?. hehehehe, now THATS funny.

> It's sitting right out there for all to see kind of like the guy that walks back into the bar from
> the bathroom with ****-stained TP hanging out of his droopy drawers.

Wow, using yourself as an example. Very brave of you Petey, very brave indeed.
>

there you go again, talking ill about your girlfriend. What a pathetic whiner.
>
>Sound familiar?

sounds like you're trying to write your autobiography to me.
>
>pete fagerlin
>
>::Revolutionary! Evolutionary! Yet so retro! :www.yestubes.com
 
On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 13:05:23 -0400, Dave W <[email protected]> wrote:

>On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 09:41:12 -0700, P e t e F a g e r l i n
<big ole snip of more flailing by Dave>
>
>>Hypocrites make me laugh, hence my reply, again.
>
>As they do me. Like I said, bet you have a blast at family reunions.
>
>> You're a little hypocritical broken record with no self-control and extreme self-esteem problems,
>> when your entire posting history is taken into account.
>
>Waaa waaa, booo hoo. Someone's hurt poor Petey's feelings.

Huh? You really can't be that dense, can you?

Would you
>like a little cheese with that whine? Mommy, make the hypocrite Dave leave me and my girlfriend
>alone...he scares me. puhleeze!

Ok, so you claim you didn't have a few drinks and then posts weirdness like this. Maybe a few bong
hits then?

Why would anyoone be scared of the usenet equivelent of the crazy guy on the corner that preaches
about how Jesus taught him to masturbate?

>>Sure go ahead and point at any
>>>direction you like, but there must be some deep underlying meaning here.
>>
>>Humor. And it's not underlying.
>
>You call that humor do you?. hehehehe, now THATS funny.

Wow, even the most simple comments have to be spelled out for you hypocrite.

That wasn't a claim that my comment was humorous. It was a comment regarding the deep meaning of
your posts. Humorous. As in "laughing at you" rather than "laughing with you."

>> It's sitting right out there for all to see kind of like the guy that walks back into the bar
>> from the bathroom with ****-stained TP hanging out of his droopy drawers.
>
>Wow, using yourself as an example. Very brave of you Petey, very brave indeed.

Ah, the ole "I know you are but what am I" routine. Brilliant, if totally unsupported by the
evidence at hand (Google away to educate yourself).

>
>there you go again, talking ill about your girlfriend. What a pathetic whiner.
>>
>>Sound familiar?
>
>sounds like you're trying to write your autobiography to me.

See above goofball.

pete fagerlin

::Revolutionary! Evolutionary! Yet so retro! :www.yestubes.com
 
regurgitated

> On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 13:05:23 -0400, Dave W <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 09:41:12 -0700, P e t e F a g e r l i n
> <big ole snip of more flailing by Petey>
>>
>>>Hypocrites make me laugh, hence my reply, again.
>>
>>As they do me. Like I said, bet you have a blast at family reunions.
>>
>>> You're a little hypocritical broken record with no self-control and extreme self-esteem
>>> problems, when your entire posting history is taken into account.
>>
>>Waaa waaa, booo hoo. Someone's hurt poor Petey's feelings.
>
> Huh? You really can't be that dense, can you?

Sure I can. And so can you. Obviously!
>
> Would you
>>like a little cheese with that whine? Mommy, make the hypocrite Dave leave me and my girlfriend
>>alone...he scares me. puhleeze!
>
> Ok, so you claim you didn't have a few drinks and then posts weirdness like this. Maybe a few bong
> hits then?

Nope don't smoke. Get a clue fool.

>
> Why would anyoone be scared of the usenet equivelent of the crazy guy on the corner that preaches
> about how Jesus taught him to masturbate?

hahaha, Jesus teaching masturbation. Petey you really have no shame do you?

>>
>>You call that humor do you?. hehehehe, now THATS funny.
>
> Wow, even the most simple comments have to be spelled out for you hypocrite.

Spell away, that seems to be a going theme round here..hahahaha

>
> That wasn't a claim that my comment was humorous. It was a comment regarding the deep meaning of
> your posts. Humorous. As in "laughing at you" rather than "laughing with you."

Likewise Petey, likewise

>
>>> It's sitting right out there for all to see kind of like the guy that walks back into the bar
>>> from the bathroom with ****-stained TP hanging out of his droopy drawers.
>>
>>Wow, using yourself as an example. Very brave of you Petey, very brave indeed.
>
> Ah, the ole "I know you are but what am I" routine. Brilliant, if totally unsupported by the
> evidence at hand (Google away to educate yourself).

I knew you'd recognize your own M.O. Pretty schweet huh?

> See above goofball.

Quit whining Petey, it's not very becoming ;-)

Dave
 
"Michael Dart" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
>
> "Raoul Deluxe" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > "Monique Y. Herman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > > > Top 10 User Agents by poster
> > >
> >
>
>===========================================================================
> > =
> > > > 1: Outlook Express................................................
:
> > 96
> > > > 2: Unknown........................................................
:
> > 38
> > > > 3: Mozilla........................................................
:
> > 19
> > > > 4: Forte Agent....................................................
:
> > 14
> > > > 5: [email protected].................................
:
> > 8
> > > > 6: slrn...........................................................
:
> > 6
> > > > 7: Pan............................................................
:
> > 5
> > > > 8: Forte Free Agent...............................................
:
> > 5
> > > > 9: MicroPlanet Gravity............................................
:
> > 4
> > > > 10: Xnews..........................................................
:
> > 4
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Woohoo! slrn doubles its a.m-b users!
> > >
> > Has anyone nym shifted?
> >
>
> I don't think so, but then I use a real good seat.
>
Thankfully so do I.
 
On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 22:21:08 -0000, Dave W <[email protected]> wrote:

>>>Waaa waaa, booo hoo. Someone's hurt poor Petey's feelings.
>>
>> Huh? You really can't be that dense, can you?
>
>Sure I can. And so can you. Obviously!

Wow. With every posts you become more and more like some seven year old on the playground. Thanks
for admitting how dense you are though. That's a step in the right direction.

>> Ok, so you claim you didn't have a few drinks and then posts
weirdness
>> like this. Maybe a few bong hits then?
>
>Nope don't smoke. Get a clue fool.

Then explain the cause of your idiocy.

>> Why would anyoone be scared of the usenet equivelent of the crazy
guy
>> on the corner that preaches about how Jesus taught him to
masturbate?
>
>hahaha, Jesus teaching masturbation. Petey you really have no shame
do you?

Shame, or lack thereof, has nothing to do with my spot-on analogy.

>> That wasn't a claim that my comment was humorous. It was a comment regarding the deep meaning of
>> your posts. Humorous. As in "laughing
at
>> you" rather than "laughing with you."
>
>Likewise Petey, likewise

Ah, back to the "I know you are but what am I" bit, eh? Wow.

>>>> It's sitting right out there for all to see kind of like the guy that walks back into the bar
>>>> from the bathroom with ****-stained TP hanging out of his droopy drawers.
>>>
>>>Wow, using yourself as an example. Very brave of you Petey, very
brave
>>>indeed.
>>
>> Ah, the ole "I know you are but what am I" routine. Brilliant, if totally unsupported by the
>> evidence at hand (Google away to educate yourself).
>
>I knew you'd recognize your own M.O. Pretty schweet huh?

Very sweet, if I ever stooped to the inane "I know you are but what am I" schtick that you use when
you back yourself into a corner with silliness.

Unfortunately for you, I don't need to resort to such pathetic tactics.

>> See above goofball.
>
>Quit whining Petey, it's not very becoming ;-)

That will be the day Dave. That I start whining, rather than twirling.

pete fagerlin

::Revolutionary! Evolutionary! Yet so retro! :www.yestubes.com
 
On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 23:26:08 -0000, Dave W <[email protected]> wrote:

>> Ah, back to the "I know you are but what am I" bit, eh? Wow.
>
>Catchy ain't it. You seem to think it works for you, so I thought I'd
give
>it a try...

Wow. Just when you think Dave can't get any goofier, he starts making even more grandiose claims.

>> Very sweet, if I ever stooped to the inane "I know you are but what
am
>> I" schtick that you use when you back yourself into a corner with silliness.
>
>hahaha, pot, kettle black? Petey you really need a clue my friend.
>
>You always do Petey, here, at MTBR, wherever you may roam. Don't deny
it,
>you know it's true.

Uh, O delusional one, please provide examples of me using your "I now you are but what am I"
lameness that you hold so dearly. Thanks.

An idiot like you claiming that I need a clue? ROTFLMAO! Priceless.

>> Unfortunately for you, I don't need to resort to such pathetic tactics.
>
>Really? hahahaha that is rich. Google is your friend Petey!

See above.

>>>> See above goofball.
>>>
>>>Quit whining Petey, it's not very becoming ;-)
>>
>> That will be the day Dave. That I start whining, rather than
twirling.
>
>Whatsamatta Petey, been on the sit and spin too long...

Nah. Twirling, as in twirling the strings of a hypocritical dunce known as Dave W, "freightdog," or
"stoner" among other things.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.