I spent some time on a Stratus last summer. When I was slowly grinding up steep hills, the bike felt quite wobbly to me. I haven't had the opportunity to spend equal time on a TE, but the TE has a rep for the best LWB direct steer handling. Some of the Strat people claim big improvements with different bars, but I felt there was more to it than that.
I did some rough measuring at a dealer (me: old guy crouching uncomfortably on the floor with a yard stick and an angle finder). I looked at a GRR EX and a Stratus. These numbers are not precise, but here is the deal: both the Stratus and GRR seem to have 60 degree head angles. But the GRR has about a half an inch less fork rake, so the GRR ends up with about 3" of trail and the Strat has about HALF that. The differences in rake and trail are substantial. A bike shouldn't _need_ 3" of trail, so the extra rake may actually be the issue.
If you could stick a fork from an EZ sport on a Strat (don't know if it would fit) that would tell the tale. The EZ has a 20" fork, as does the Strat, but the EZ fork has a lot less rake than the Strat fork.
BTW, the EZ has a steeper head tube, but less rake than the GRR, so the trail seemed similar. For some reason the EZ feels like it has a bit more flop than the GRR when you ride it, even though it has a steeper angle (about 62) and less rake.
Again, my numbers may be off, but I think the directions of the differences are correct. Or I could be all wrong ;-)
johnriley1 (at) rogers.com
I did some rough measuring at a dealer (me: old guy crouching uncomfortably on the floor with a yard stick and an angle finder). I looked at a GRR EX and a Stratus. These numbers are not precise, but here is the deal: both the Stratus and GRR seem to have 60 degree head angles. But the GRR has about a half an inch less fork rake, so the GRR ends up with about 3" of trail and the Strat has about HALF that. The differences in rake and trail are substantial. A bike shouldn't _need_ 3" of trail, so the extra rake may actually be the issue.
If you could stick a fork from an EZ sport on a Strat (don't know if it would fit) that would tell the tale. The EZ has a 20" fork, as does the Strat, but the EZ fork has a lot less rake than the Strat fork.
BTW, the EZ has a steeper head tube, but less rake than the GRR, so the trail seemed similar. For some reason the EZ feels like it has a bit more flop than the GRR when you ride it, even though it has a steeper angle (about 62) and less rake.
Again, my numbers may be off, but I think the directions of the differences are correct. Or I could be all wrong ;-)
johnriley1 (at) rogers.com