Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

stem, other differences: btwn road and cyclocross?

Started by heaventree · · Last activity · 3 posts · 389 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
19 November 2007
Last activity
19 November 2007
Original author
heaventree
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
389
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I've seen discussion that the essential difference between a
    cyclocross and a road bike is the cantilever breaks and the greater
    frame clearance for knobby tires -- but it also seems the stem on a
    cyclocross is taller and the drop bar angle is higher. I'm talking
    about, say, a Bianchi San Jose or Roger, a Specialized Tricross, etc.

    I'm asking because I bought a nice Tricross for riding this winter
    through the potholes and slush in NYC and it got stolen 2 weeks later
    so now I'm going to convert my singlespeed for winter use. I want
    drop bars but a bit more "heads up" than track bars and knob treads
    for the nasty streets.

    Any thoughts on the stem issue - just curious.

  2. heaventree said:

    I've seen discussion that the essential difference between a
    cyclocross and a road bike is the cantilever breaks and the greater
    frame clearance for knobby tires -- but it also seems the stem on a
    cyclocross is taller and the drop bar angle is higher. I'm talking
    about, say, a Bianchi San Jose or Roger, a Specialized Tricross, etc.

    I'm asking because I bought a nice Tricross for riding this winter
    through the potholes and slush in NYC and it got stolen 2 weeks later
    so now I'm going to convert my singlespeed for winter use. I want
    drop bars but a bit more "heads up" than track bars and knob treads
    for the nasty streets.

    Any thoughts on the stem issue - just curious.

    Generally speaking, if a person rides both road and cyclocross, the
    cockpit length would be shorter on the cyclocross compared to the road
    bike to provide better technical control on the intended (cyclocross)
    terrain. Whether this implies in practice a shorter stem would depend
    on your actual TT measurement of your bikes.

  3. heaventree said:

    I've seen discussion that the essential difference between a
    cyclocross and a road bike is the cantilever breaks and the greater
    frame clearance for knobby tires -- but it also seems the stem on a
    cyclocross is taller and the drop bar angle is higher. I'm talking
    about, say, a Bianchi San Jose or Roger, a Specialized Tricross, etc.

    I'm asking because I bought a nice Tricross for riding this winter
    through the potholes and slush in NYC and it got stolen 2 weeks later
    so now I'm going to convert my singlespeed for winter use. I want
    drop bars but a bit more "heads up" than track bars and knob treads
    for the nasty streets.

    Any thoughts on the stem issue - just curious.

    the cyclocross bike is a perfect hybrid between mountain bike and road
    bikes. the gear are different, brakes, length of top tube, the saddle.
    carlos
    www.bikingthings.com

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.