STILL GOING STONG AT A 1LB A WEEK (216LBS)

Discussion in 'Food and nutrition' started by Rob, Feb 27, 2004.

  1. Rob

    Rob Guest

    Stared online weight watchers at 17stone (238LBs) in oct 2003.... Now at 15st,6lb (216LBs) not bad
    really I was 15st,11 (221LBs) on the 1st feb 2004, so 4 weeks later i've lost 5lbs not bad, 1.25lb a
    week is ok for me, as long as it go,s down and not up its fine buy me, I don't need to lose 10lb a
    week to feel great. (slow can be fast somtimes)
     
    Tags:


  2. Lesanne

    Lesanne Guest

    Excellent. In my experience slow and steady Wins the Race :)!

    "rob" <robhingston[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > Stared online weight watchers at 17stone (238LBs) in oct 2003.... Now at 15st,6lb (216LBs) not bad
    > really I was 15st,11 (221LBs) on the 1st feb 2004, so 4 weeks later i've lost 5lbs not bad, 1.25lb
    > a week is ok for me, as long as it go,s down and not up its fine buy me, I don't need to lose 10lb
    > a week to feel great. (slow can be fast somtimes)
     
  3. Krys

    Krys Guest

    slow but steady wins the race every time :)

    --
    krys

    UK 157/130.2/126 Started March 1st 2001 GOAL August 16th 2001 ...kind of making progress...

    "rob" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > Stared online weight watchers at 17stone (238LBs) in oct 2003.... Now at 15st,6lb (216LBs) not bad
    > really I was 15st,11 (221LBs) on the 1st feb 2004, so 4 weeks later i've lost 5lbs not bad, 1.25lb
    > a week is ok for me, as long as it go,s down and not up its fine buy me, I don't need to lose 10lb
    > a week to feel great. (slow can be fast somtimes)
     
  4. Fred

    Fred Guest

    Congrats on those losses. They do add DOWN!

    On 27 Feb 2004 06:31:58 -0800, [email protected] (rob) wrote:

    >Stared online weight watchers at 17stone (238LBs) in oct 2003.... Now at 15st,6lb (216LBs) not bad
    >really I was 15st,11 (221LBs) on the 1st feb 2004, so 4 weeks later i've lost 5lbs not bad, 1.25lb
    >a week is ok for me, as long as it go,s down and not up its fine buy me, I don't need to lose 10lb
    >a week to feel great. (slow can be fast somtimes)
     
  5. Connie

    Connie Guest

    rob wrote:
    > Stared online weight watchers at 17stone (238LBs) in oct 2003.... Now at 15st,6lb (216LBs) not bad
    > really I was 15st,11 (221LBs) on the 1st feb 2004, so 4 weeks later i've lost 5lbs not bad, 1.25lb
    > a week is ok for me, as long as it go,s down and not up its fine buy me, I don't need to lose 10lb
    > a week to feel great. (slow can be fast somtimes)

    Congrats Rob!!

    --

    Cheers,

    Connie Walsh

    241.5/201.5/155 RAFL 210.5/201.5/198.5
     
  6. Nathalie W

    Nathalie W Guest

    Great job, Rob!
    --
    Nathalie from Belgium
    134.1/101.1/minigoal 99.9 Goal 68 Kg
    134.1/101.2/minigoal 220.3/Goal 150 pounds RAFL 105.3/101.4/96 Kg
    134/1.102/212 lbs "rob" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > Stared online weight watchers at 17stone (238LBs) in oct 2003.... Now at 15st,6lb (216LBs) not bad
    > really I was 15st,11 (221LBs) on the 1st feb 2004, so 4 weeks later i've lost 5lbs not bad, 1.25lb
    > a week is ok for me, as long as it go,s down and not up its fine buy me, I don't need to lose 10lb
    > a week to feel great. (slow can be fast somtimes)
     
  7. Skiur

    Skiur Guest

    Congratulations! :)

    Julie "rob" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > Stared online weight watchers at 17stone (238LBs) in oct 2003.... Now at 15st,6lb (216LBs) not bad
    > really I was 15st,11 (221LBs) on the 1st feb 2004, so 4 weeks later i've lost 5lbs not bad, 1.25lb
    > a week is ok for me, as long as it go,s down and not up its fine buy me, I don't need to lose 10lb
    > a week to feel great. (slow can be fast somtimes)
     
  8. You are doing well. In fact, if you did lose 10 lbs a week, you'd stop feeling great rather quickly.
    Keep doing what you're doing.

    Prairie Roots On 27 Feb 2004 06:31:58 -0800, [email protected] (rob) wrote:

    >Stared online weight watchers at 17stone (238LBs) in oct 2003.... Now at 15st,6lb (216LBs) not bad
    >really I was 15st,11 (221LBs) on the 1st feb 2004, so 4 weeks later i've lost 5lbs not bad, 1.25lb
    >a week is ok for me, as long as it go,s down and not up its fine buy me, I don't need to lose 10lb
    >a week to feel great. (slow can be fast somtimes)
     
  9. great losses and even better attitude, Lee
    rob <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > Stared online weight watchers at 17stone (238LBs) in oct 2003.... Now at 15st,6lb (216LBs) not bad
    > really I was 15st,11 (221LBs) on the 1st feb 2004, so 4 weeks later i've lost 5lbs not bad, 1.25lb
    > a week is ok for me, as long as it go,s down and not up its fine buy me, I don't need to lose 10lb
    > a week to feel great. (slow can be fast somtimes)
     
  10. Kristin

    Kristin Guest

    You are doing really great, Rob! :) Congrats!!

    --

    ~Kristin O~
    272/239.4/172

    "rob" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > Stared online weight watchers at 17stone (238LBs) in oct 2003.... Now at 15st,6lb (216LBs) not bad
    > really I was 15st,11 (221LBs) on the 1st feb 2004, so 4 weeks later i've lost 5lbs not bad, 1.25lb
    > a week is ok for me, as long as it go,s down and not up its fine buy me, I don't need to lose 10lb
    > a week to feel great. (slow can be fast somtimes)
     
Loading...