B
Bob (this one)
Guest
Nancy1 wrote:
> Bob (this one) wrote:
>
>>aem wrote:
>>
>>>Nancy1 wrote:
>>>
>>>>Nothing beats first-hand experience, Bob. [snip]
>>>>
>>>>If it doesn't work for you, fine, don't do it.
>>>>
>>>>It does work for me. I don't understand why you continue to argue ...[snip]
>>>
>>>Of course you understand why. You're just too polite to say it.
>>
>>I'm sorry if I hurt your widdle feelings to the point where you have to
>>take these little shots.
>>
>>Oh, wait. No I'm not.
>>
>>Pastorio
>
> You didn't hurt my feelings - WTF are you on, anyway?
Nancy, darlin... Not everything is about you. Go up top and look at the
attributions. See...? aem felt the need to jump in with a snide comment.
That's what I'm on about.
You and I have been pushing an idea around - admittedly with a bit of
heat - but not getting nasty.
It follows as the day follows the night, those attributions. If I had
something to say to you, I would have put it immediately following
something you'd said. If I didn't put it there, it isn't about you.
> or maybe off?
> And in previous posts, I didn't take any little shots - I said, fine,
> you don't need to store things upside down; I find it useful, so what's
> the point in carrying on with this?
Have a nice cup of tea or some damn thing. You're beginning to make a
habit of assuming that my post is about you when the attributions were
clear enough to the contrary.
Pastorio
> Bob (this one) wrote:
>
>>aem wrote:
>>
>>>Nancy1 wrote:
>>>
>>>>Nothing beats first-hand experience, Bob. [snip]
>>>>
>>>>If it doesn't work for you, fine, don't do it.
>>>>
>>>>It does work for me. I don't understand why you continue to argue ...[snip]
>>>
>>>Of course you understand why. You're just too polite to say it.
>>
>>I'm sorry if I hurt your widdle feelings to the point where you have to
>>take these little shots.
>>
>>Oh, wait. No I'm not.
>>
>>Pastorio
>
> You didn't hurt my feelings - WTF are you on, anyway?
Nancy, darlin... Not everything is about you. Go up top and look at the
attributions. See...? aem felt the need to jump in with a snide comment.
That's what I'm on about.
You and I have been pushing an idea around - admittedly with a bit of
heat - but not getting nasty.
It follows as the day follows the night, those attributions. If I had
something to say to you, I would have put it immediately following
something you'd said. If I didn't put it there, it isn't about you.
> or maybe off?
> And in previous posts, I didn't take any little shots - I said, fine,
> you don't need to store things upside down; I find it useful, so what's
> the point in carrying on with this?
Have a nice cup of tea or some damn thing. You're beginning to make a
habit of assuming that my post is about you when the attributions were
clear enough to the contrary.
Pastorio