Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
> Bob Pastorio wrote:
>
>>Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote
>>Oh, my, Chung posts a snide non sequitur.
>>
>>Snide, a. [orig., counterfeit, bogus from thieves' slang] sly and
>>malicious; as a snide remark.
>>
>>Snide, n. a sly and malicious person.
>>
>>E-va'-sion, n.
>>1. an avoiding of a duty, question, fact, etc. by deceit or cleverness.
>>2. the means of doing this; excuse, subterfuge, equivocation, artifice.
>> "Thou by evasions thy crime uncoverest more." - Milton.
>>Synonyms - sophistry, subterfuge, prevarication, equivocation, artifice.
>>
> Are you playing scrabble, Pastorio?
For Chung's convenience, I'm listing some of the words that apply to
him and his methods and style. It should demonstrate my heartfelt
concern for him and his future. Chung says it's not a contest and then
does this. Who (or what) to believe...? Could the axiom, "Actions
speak louder than words" apply?
>>>>We haven't seen a heartfelt "testimonial" like this in a while. Since
>>>>that last woman who went to medical school with Chung or whatever it
>>>>was. She sure disappeared fast enough.
>>>
>>>Don't remember that one, Pastorio. Was that an auditory or visual
>>>hallucination for you?
>>
>>More likely a sign of Chung's degenerating faculties? Here's the
>>fraudulent effluent from the Chung/Mu machine: <http://tinyurl.com/xybr>
>>
> Reviewed the post. Don't know Mel Hall. Don't even know Mel's gender. Mel certainly is not a
> medical school classmate of mine. Where's your source for this information (gender and medical
> school education)?
>
> Are you sure you aren't eating those mushrooms again?
It would seem that the often-noted poor reading capacities of Chung
have just been documented. His much-boasted ability to see "truth" is
likewise as crippled as others have shown. Perhaps he missed the
dismissive, "or whatever it was. She sure disappeared fast enough."
that marks utter disbelief.
The first sentence of the posts is: "Hello, my name is Mel Hall and I
am a graduate of the University of Tennessee Medical School."
Mel's gender is clear enough based on her reference to her "ex-husband."
>>I bet Chung can't remember "Mel Hall" because it's almost as
>>embarrassing as the rest of the fake posts.
>
> Don't remember Mel Hall's posts as you describe them. Would definitely remember post from my
> medical school classmates.
>
>>And, well, the real ones
>>too.
>
> How do you know they are fake?
>
>>"Mel Hall" claims to have gone to school with Mu.
>
> Well, which is it?
It doesn't really matter, for the sake of establishing integrity.
> You seem to be confused. First Mel is my classmate and now Mel is Mu's.
>
>>Six of one...
>>
> Sounds like six too many for you.
You and Mu are the unfortunate matching sides of a tarnished coin.
Differentiating one from the other is a needless exercise.
Another reason to bring up "Mel" is her "statistics" about what
happens when her ex, John, put people on the 2PD and tracked them.
Here's what she says:
"John has placed dozens upon dozens of his patients on the TPD."
"The numbers come to this. Over 85% had lasted on the diet for at
least six months and every one of them had lost weight and had lost
weigh on a controlled basis. No diabetic issues were reported. As of
August, 2003. John had 48 patients on the TPD (starting with slightly
over 55 if I remember correctly); in six months or less every patient
had garbaged their food scales and could accurately assess food
weights."
Even though the whole post smacks of fraud, note how she posted
numbers, fake as they might be. Mu and Chung don't even do that
claiming that it would violate patient confidentiality. Seems like
this "Mel" has no such restraints, and it's obvious why. No patients
can be identified or compromised by this. Another fraud, another
evasion, another avoidance of anything approaching the rigor of
science from Chung and Mu.
> May only seem like one mushroom.
>
>>>Are you still eating those mushrooms you wrote about earlier in the
>>>year?
>>
>>Shiitake, enokitake, crimini... Could Chung be more sleazy?
>
> Why is making observations about your behavior and eating habits sleazy?
>
> Why are you ashamed of your habits?
If the observations were even remotely truthful and considered, they
might have value. But I already gave Chung the rationale for calling
him sleazy and it seems that his "truth-finder" <heh> skills are
failing. Here, once more:
>>In-nu-en'-do, n. an indirect remark, gesture or reference, usually
>>implying something derogatory; hint; insinuation.
>>
>>In-sin-u-a'-tion, n. that which is insinuated; a hint; a suggestion or
>>intimation by distant allusion; as slander may be conveyed by
>>insinuations.
He is sleazy because his insinuations are specifically intended to
denigrate while claiming neutrality and even that sanctimonious fakery
of his fundamentalist, fanatical "Chungianity" that he substitutes for
anything approaching the generosity of spirit of real christianity.
>>Oh, wait,
>>it's Chung.
>>
> Yes. Not Mu.
The difference is more apparent than real.
>>In-nu-en'-do, n. an indirect remark, gesture or reference, usually
>>implying something derogatory; hint; insinuation.
>>
>>In-sin-u-a'-tion, n. that which is insinuated; a hint; a suggestion or
>>intimation by distant allusion; as slander may be conveyed by
>>insinuations.
> Back to scrabble again...
Back to truth and clarity of definition. Back to clear elaboration of
Chung's legion frauds. Back to unavoidable boundaries.
>>>>>John
>>>>
>>>>I wonder if he knows that lots of people call toilets "john."
>>>
>>>Perhaps we should rename them Pastorio.
>>
>>This passes for wit Chez Chung.
>>
> Time to flush the Pastorio.
Chung's X-mas wish.
>>>>Pastorio
>>>
>>>You have my heartfelt pity and my love, neighbor.
>>
>>Love, n.
>>1. a strong affection for or attachment or devotion to a person or
>>persons.
>>2. a strong liking for or interest in something; as, her love of acting.
>>3. a strong, usually passionate, affection for a person of the
>>opposite sex.
>>4. the person who is the object of such an affection; a sweetheart; a
>>lover.
>>5. sexual passion or its gratification.
>>6. (a) cupid or eros as the god of love; (b) Venus.
>>7. in tennis, a score of zero.
>>8. in theology, (a) God's benevolent concern for mankind; (b) man's
>>devout attachment to God; (c) the feeling of benevolence and
>>brotherhood that people should have for each other.
>>
> Would subscribe to the latter.
And yet, Chung's actions and words tell the real story.
> Don't forget that I have written that if I encountered you dying somewhere (ie on a cath table),
> that I would not hesitate to resuscitate you. This would prove the feeling of benevolent concern I
> would have for you, neighbor.
Nah. That's some untestable braggadocio. The history of Chung's words
say that benevolence isn't important. The words he uses and the claims
he makes and the boasts he offers say that his concern is egotistical
rather than benevolent. Once again, he lies, deliberately or because
of his mental infirmities.
That "benevolence" that will never be in a position to be seen proves
nothing; a theoretical boast. But his statement of it further proves
the accusation of his lack of honesty.
>>Be-nev'-o-lence, n.
>>1. any inclination to do good; good will; kindness; charitableness.
>>2. an act of kindness; good done; charity given; gift.
>>Synonyms - kindness, benignity, tenderness, alms-giving, beneficence,
>>bounty, charity, generosity, good will, humanity, kindheartedness,
>>kindliness, liberality, munificence, philanthropy.
>>
> My participation here and elsewhere as a cardiologist freely helping people with their medical
> questions should serve to prove that I indeed love my neighbors.
Chung's denigration of others. his deliberate lying, his deliberate
swaggering, contentiousness, his inevitable dispute with anyone
offering a different opinion, his frequent use of innuendo, and his
general fraudulence and quackery mark him as a person more caught up
in his own unhealthy needs than in anything approaching altruism.
His promotion of the 2PD with all its dangerous flaws marks him as a
superficial thinker. And his recent comment about it being in the
"public domain" and therefore known to other physicians only serves to
reinforce the idea that egotism not altruism motivates him. It would
seem that he actually believes that responsible health care providers
would endorse this one-dimensional approach.
>>>You also remain in my prayers.
>>
>>Hyp'-o-crite, n. one who feigns to be what he is not; especially one
>>who pretends to be pious, virtuous, etc. without really being so.
>
> How do you feign a prayer?
Chung is so cute when he deliberately "misunderstands." Chung feigns
piety when he is actually using it as another weapon in his arsenal of
broken arrows.
>> "And the hypocrite's hope shall perish." Job viii. 13.
>
> So it shall.
>
>>>May God cure you of your obsessions
>>>soon.
>>
>>It's pretending to psychiatric "diagnoses" like this
>
> Who's pretending?
The fraud Chung is pretending to have knowledge of a medical
discipline not in his line of work.
>>that create the
>>setting to justify, almost demand, calling Chung a...
>>
> Could it be that Pastorio is growing wiser?
Pastorio continues to spotlight fraud, chicanery, innuendo, fakery,
quackery, malice and hypocrisy. Look where the light shines...
>>Quack, n. (short for quacksalver)
>>1. one who, with little skill or foundation, pretends to have skill in
>>a particular field.
>>2. an untrained pretender to medical skill he does not posses; a
>>fraudulent practitioner.
>>Synonym - charlatan, empiric, imposter, mountebank, pretender
>
> Guess not:
>
> http://www.heartmdphd.com/libel.asp
Poor Chung is wounded by the lack of respect he so richly deserves, in
his mind.
It's hilarious reading his TV lawyer words on this page. It's also
instructive how Chung tries to make words mean what they don't. And
tries to make things in context mean something else.
If it's deliberate, he's a liar. If it's because of some deficiency in
his reading or comprehension skills, it's considerably more serious.
His response to the "Mel Hall" post referred to at the top of this
note would imply that he truly can't read and understand. That has
implications for his medical practice and his patients.
De-lus'-ion, n.
1. the act of deluding; deception; a misleading of the mind.
2. the state of being deluded.
3. a false belief or opinion
4. in psychiatry, a false, persistent belief not substantiated by
sensory evidence.
synonyms - illusion, fallacy, deception, error, hallucination.
De-lu'-sive, a.
1. apt to deceive; tending to mislead; deceptive, beguiling...
2. characterized by delusion; deceptive.
> Humbly,
Hum'-ble, n.
1. having or showing a consciousness of one's defects or shortcomings;
not proud; not self-assertive; modest.
synonyms. - lowly, meek, submissive, unassuming, unobtrusive, unassuming.
Hu-mil'-i-ty, n.
1. the state or quality of being humble of mind or spirit; absence of
pride or self-assertion.
2. [pl] acts of self-abasement.
It's likewise telling that, even after being shown the sorts of
definitions that rational people employ, Chung persists in adhering to
his obviously fake self-descriptions.
Pity.
Pastorio