L
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 08:14:07 -0800, [email protected]ere wrote:
>On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 07:42:35 -0500, [email protected] wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 00:25:14 +0100, Gosia <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>>Apparently he is and he has. Unbelievable, isn't it?
>>>
>>>Yes. I don;t know any other doctor who gives medical advice through
>>>internet.
>>>
>>>
>>>Gosia
>>>
>>
>>There are many forums (i.e. the Cleveland Clinic forums) where doctors
>>offer opinion and/or advice to questions.
>
>True, but none of these come with a sermon. <grin> Many people have
>made it clear that they do not appreciate the quasi-religious part. It
>is clearly off topic here. Would you agree?
>
>>Of course, that's no substitute to consulting with a doctor personally
>>- something which Dr. Chung usually suggests.
>
>What he usually suggests is his diet, even though it has no published
>scientific basis. He is the biggest spammer in the newsgroup. A good
>doctor would suggest trying one of the many diets that DO have a
>scientific basis, but that's NOT what he does. Diets work best when
>they are tailored for the needs of a specific individual. Would you
>agree?
>Matt
Matt,
I haven't the slightest interest in Dr. Chung's religious beliefs or
Diet suggestions and I simply ignore them. It's easy to do and does
not result in the prolix and voluble meanderings that sometimes occur
here.
>On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 07:42:35 -0500, [email protected] wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 00:25:14 +0100, Gosia <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>>Apparently he is and he has. Unbelievable, isn't it?
>>>
>>>Yes. I don;t know any other doctor who gives medical advice through
>>>internet.
>>>
>>>
>>>Gosia
>>>
>>
>>There are many forums (i.e. the Cleveland Clinic forums) where doctors
>>offer opinion and/or advice to questions.
>
>True, but none of these come with a sermon. <grin> Many people have
>made it clear that they do not appreciate the quasi-religious part. It
>is clearly off topic here. Would you agree?
>
>>Of course, that's no substitute to consulting with a doctor personally
>>- something which Dr. Chung usually suggests.
>
>What he usually suggests is his diet, even though it has no published
>scientific basis. He is the biggest spammer in the newsgroup. A good
>doctor would suggest trying one of the many diets that DO have a
>scientific basis, but that's NOT what he does. Diets work best when
>they are tailored for the needs of a specific individual. Would you
>agree?
>Matt
Matt,
I haven't the slightest interest in Dr. Chung's religious beliefs or
Diet suggestions and I simply ignore them. It's easy to do and does
not result in the prolix and voluble meanderings that sometimes occur
here.