sun protective clothing

[[email protected]]

HI,

I have been buying sun protective clothing for my children for 6 years
now and I have had the best results from:

www.sunsmartpr.com
www.kristyjuv.com
www.shadysun.com
www.alexandme.com

There are so many options now and these 2 have the best customer
service and selection.

I recently found www.kristyjuv.com and she has women's outfits which I
have purchased.

 

[john]

On Mar 19, 10:43 am, [email protected] wrote:
> HI,
>
> I have been buying sun protective clothing for my children for 6 years
> now and I have had the best results from:
>
> www.sunsmartpr.comwww.kristyjuv.comwww.shadysun.comwww.alexandme.com
>
> There are so many options now and these 2 have the best customer
> service and selection.
>
> I recently foundwww.kristyjuv.comand she has women's outfits which I
> have purchased.

What am I missing here? I've wondered for some time about the need for
sun protective clothing. I've never gotten sunburn through bicycling
or any other type clothing. If I don't use a heavy-duty sunscreen (30
SPF or more) on exposed skin, I become a lobster. What is the need for
sun protective clothing? Only albinos are lighter skinned than me. If
I don't need sun protective clothing, who does?

Baffled, John

 

[Bill Sornson]

[email protected] wrote:
> HI,
>
> I have been buying sun protective clothing for my children for 6 years
> now and I have had the best results from:

{BLATANT SPAM REMOVED}

> There are so many options now and these 2 have the best customer
> service and selection.
>
> I recently found this spammer and she has women's outfits which I
> have purchased.

Big whoop. Go away.

BS (really)

 

[[email protected]]

right! no daily protection now and 25 years from now yawl experience a
higher incidence of serious skin problems. science marchs on.
i ride thru the beach area and skin is always a good opener. "hi
there. love your skin. yaknow ura gonna burn to a crisp if..."
and they are out there because because once again PEOPLE ARE STUPID.

here's a real good piece of apprel:

http://www.campmor.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?memberId=12500226&productId=77269

its light, wears well at 100 degrees for the shade and 20 degrees for
the warmth. and shade the scalp from UV, road dirt, flying fleas,
angry bees, keeps hair in place soas the eyeglass or helmet mouted
mirroris useable
NAD !! yeah it rolls up into a watch cap cover the forehead repeat
after me
COVERS THE FOREHEAD. where yawl gonna gp bald.
"i'd liketa mmmmmmmmmmm rub some on your buttocks...."
no not your buttocks soronson.
and off course yawl can use the manzella to stick up macdonalds

 

[Michael Press]

In article
<[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:

> right! no daily protection now and 25 years from now yawl experience a
> higher incidence of serious skin problems. science marchs on.
> i ride thru the beach area and skin is always a good opener. "hi
> there. love your skin. yaknow ura gonna burn to a crisp if..."
> and they are out there because because once again PEOPLE ARE STUPID.
>
> here's a real good piece of apprel:
>
> http://www.campmor.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet ...

Here you are without the memberId
<http://www.campmor.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?productId=77269>
--
Michael Press

 

[jim beam]

[email protected] wrote:
> right! no daily protection now and 25 years from now yawl experience a
> higher incidence of serious skin problems. science marchs on.
> i ride thru the beach area and skin is always a good opener. "hi
> there. love your skin. yaknow ura gonna burn to a crisp if..."
> and they are out there because because once again PEOPLE ARE STUPID.
>
> here's a real good piece of apprel:
>
> http://www.campmor.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?memberId=12500226&productId=77269
>
> its light, wears well at 100 degrees for the shade and 20 degrees for
> the warmth. and shade the scalp from UV, road dirt, flying fleas,
> angry bees, keeps hair in place soas the eyeglass or helmet mouted
> mirroris useable
> NAD !! yeah it rolls up into a watch cap cover the forehead repeat
> after me
> COVERS THE FOREHEAD. where yawl gonna gp bald.
> "i'd liketa mmmmmmmmmmm rub some on your buttocks...."
> no not your buttocks soronson.
> and off course yawl can use the manzella to stick up macdonalds
>

you walk into mickeys dressed like that???

 

[Jay Beattie]

On Mar 19, 5:50 pm, Michael Press <[email protected]> wrote:
> In article
> <[email protected]>,
>
> "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > right! no daily protection now and 25 years from now yawl experience a
> > higher incidence of serious skin problems. science marchs on.
> > i ride thru the beach area and skin is always a good opener. "hi
> > there. love your skin. yaknow ura gonna burn to a crisp if..."
> > and they are out there because because once again PEOPLE ARE STUPID.
>
> > here's a real good piece of apprel:
>
> >http://www.campmor.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet...
>
> Here you are without the memberId
> <http://www.campmor.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?produ...>
> --
> Michael Press

More options for our female friends: http://tinyurl.com/2zqgdp -- Jay
Beattie.

 

[David L. Johnson]

john wrote:

> What am I missing here? I've wondered for some time about the need for
> sun protective clothing. I've never gotten sunburn through bicycling
> or any other type clothing. If I don't use a heavy-duty sunscreen (30
> SPF or more) on exposed skin, I become a lobster. What is the need for
> sun protective clothing? Only albinos are lighter skinned than me. If
> I don't need sun protective clothing, who does?
>
> Baffled, John

I have to concur. I don't get it. _Clothing_ is sun-protecting. I
have a similar pallor, always burn if I run around in the sun either
without clothing (but, then, that would be the least of my problems....)
or without sunscreen on exposed skin. I know several dermatologists on
a first-name basis.

I have never had any hint of a burn on parts of my body that were under
clothing. That is sort of what a farmer's tan is about.

I think this is just another case of fear driving people to buy things
that do nothing but drain their wallets.

--

David L. Johnson

"Business!" cried the Ghost. "Mankind was my business. The common
welfare was my business; charity, mercy, forbearance, and
benevolence, were, all, my business. The dealings of my trade were but
a drop of water in the comprehensive ocean of my business!" --Dickens,

 

[Kerry Montgomery]

"David L. Johnson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> john wrote:
>
>> What am I missing here? I've wondered for some time about the need for
>> sun protective clothing. I've never gotten sunburn through bicycling
>> or any other type clothing. If I don't use a heavy-duty sunscreen (30
>> SPF or more) on exposed skin, I become a lobster. What is the need for
>> sun protective clothing? Only albinos are lighter skinned than me. If
>> I don't need sun protective clothing, who does?
>>
>> Baffled, John
>
> I have to concur. I don't get it. _Clothing_ is sun-protecting. I have
> a similar pallor, always burn if I run around in the sun either without
> clothing (but, then, that would be the least of my problems....) or
> without sunscreen on exposed skin. I know several dermatologists on a
> first-name basis.
>
> I have never had any hint of a burn on parts of my body that were under
> clothing. That is sort of what a farmer's tan is about.
>
> I think this is just another case of fear driving people to buy things
> that do nothing but drain their wallets.
>
> --
>
> David L. Johnson
>
> "Business!" cried the Ghost. "Mankind was my business. The common
> welfare was my business; charity, mercy, forbearance, and
> benevolence, were, all, my business. The dealings of my trade were but
> a drop of water in the comprehensive ocean of my business!" --Dickens,

And for the opposite effect:
http://www.tanthrough.com/cj/index.htm
Kerry

 

[Mark]

David L. Johnson wrote:
> john wrote:
>
>> What am I missing here? I've wondered for some time about the need for
>> sun protective clothing. I've never gotten sunburn through bicycling
>> or any other type clothing. If I don't use a heavy-duty sunscreen (30
>> SPF or more) on exposed skin, I become a lobster. What is the need for
>> sun protective clothing? Only albinos are lighter skinned than me. If
>> I don't need sun protective clothing, who does?
>>
>> Baffled, John
>
> I have to concur. I don't get it. _Clothing_ is sun-protecting. I
> have a similar pallor, always burn if I run around in the sun either
> without clothing (but, then, that would be the least of my problems....)
> or without sunscreen on exposed skin. I know several dermatologists on
> a first-name basis.
>
> I have never had any hint of a burn on parts of my body that were under
> clothing. That is sort of what a farmer's tan is about.

I agree too, though I did burn through a cheap/thin jersey once, while
doing all-day rides at 6000+ feet altitude (more UV up there).
Burn-through clothing is clearly the exception, however.

Mark J.

 

[G.T.]

David L. Johnson wrote:
> john wrote:
>
>> What am I missing here? I've wondered for some time about the need for
>> sun protective clothing. I've never gotten sunburn through bicycling
>> or any other type clothing. If I don't use a heavy-duty sunscreen (30
>> SPF or more) on exposed skin, I become a lobster. What is the need for
>> sun protective clothing? Only albinos are lighter skinned than me. If
>> I don't need sun protective clothing, who does?
>>
>> Baffled, John
>
> I have to concur. I don't get it. _Clothing_ is sun-protecting.

I've never been burned through a solid color jersey or shirt, but I have
been burned through thinner white t-shirts.

But in general these people pushing sun protective clothing are just
catering to the nannyism that's run rampant in the USA because of our
sensationalist and alarmist press.

Greg

--
The ticketbastard Tax Tracker:
http://www.ticketmastersucks.org/tracker.html

 

[catzz66]

G.T. wrote:
>
> I've never been burned through a solid color jersey or shirt, but I have
> been burned through thinner white t-shirts.
>
> But in general these people pushing sun protective clothing are just
> catering to the nannyism that's run rampant in the USA because of our
> sensationalist and alarmist press.
>
>

People are always looking for an angle to sell us something, but skin
cancer is no fun either.

 

[[email protected]]

"People are always looking for an angle to sell us something, but
skin
cancer is no fun either. "

there's a youth problem hear?

in florida, skin cancers from getting outside 365 and/or fishing do
occur in older people, like me, whose skin no longer produces the
whormones and then oils (cebum) giving ZITS pustular infections filled
with dead tissue excreted by bacteria, some deadly, who who who are
eating your body.
large doses of ultraviolet when young reduce the skin's effectiveness
for protecting itself later on like now for me where if I do not use
spf 40+ on neck and outstrecthed bar arms then the skin develops brown
spots, if I use 40+ then i don't have brown spots.
same goes for the legs. hot wind burns shin skin. covering shin skin
with spf 40+ protects not only from the wind burn but the hail of dog/
bird/human excrement found 1' up off the pavement.
nothing like young flesh.
welp, time ta ride dude!

 

[David L. Johnson]

catzz66 wrote:

> People are always looking for an angle to sell us something, but skin
> cancer is no fun either.

Being a prime candidate for skin cancer myself, it really pisses me off
to see this snake-oil stuff. These people are preying on our collective
fears, trying to sell us something we just do not need.

--

David L. Johnson

Arguing with an engineer is like mud wrestling with a pig...
You soon find out the pig likes it!