In article <
[email protected]>,
[email protected] (g.daniels) wrote:
> given adequate mileages with both design/manufacture types, the rider, *paying close attention to
> the definition of occurances or performance phenomena, number of occurance,type,severity and
> comparing the two design groups, that is shimano and OLD suntour perfects AND that includes ham
> handed installations of stuff, wear mismatches and various excresence of that ilk worn by us
> lesser riders who grub ^%$& from dumpsters,ahem,(there's the green line agin)that the shimano
> people produce a rear cluster that is better shifting and quieter and requires less fiddling to
> get the chain riding properly in alignment between CR and rear cluster and thru the
> pulleys/cage-and this deducks hmmmm 7-8% aggravation better spent watching for the errant SUV
> bearing down on ur bod dude.OFF Course this in no way implies any criticism of the Suntour product
> which is well designed, well made, attractive, durable, and can be used as a spare or door
> stop,paper weight...its just that it seems like the shim people spent more time on R/D just like
> frank sez. reality marches onward.its not like the ramps and gear alignments of the shim vs. the
> suntour force any radical alteration of personal umwelt like say the 8/9 friction/index posture
> ongoing somwhere else.making the distinction, see sentence or rather see asterick* i guess,
> experiencing a simple mechanism is pleasurabble whereas doing ditto with your fuel injected
> renooh... now does this answer the question?
No, it doesn't.
I could be wrong, though, because your writing is unintelligible. Try some actual sentences, they do
improve communication.
--
Ted Bennett Portland OR