.... what would be interesting, but I don't suppose it will be published, is
the vote numbers the others got? My money would be on Eden as runner
up and the other two way back down the track.
What makes the thing even better is that the £50 mill is only half the
deal - the LAs etc have agreed a 50/50 matched funding so it's really £100
mill.
I wonder who'll present the cheque to Grimshaw? .... IIRC when they got the
£40 mill before it was Mr Loaf (aka Meatloaf) that did the honours.
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 20:23:55 -0000, "RG" <nochance> wrote:
>
>"Tom Crispin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:51:29 +0000, Steve
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7140621.stm
>>>
>>>Best of a bad bunch I guess, but some benefit is better than nothing.
>>
>> It won close to half the vote.
>
>... what would be interesting, but I don't suppose it will be published, is
>the vote numbers the others got? My money would be on Eden as runner
>up and the other two way back down the track.
>
>What makes the thing even better is that the £50 mill is only half the
>deal - the LAs etc have agreed a 50/50 matched funding so it's really £100
>mill.
>
>I wonder who'll present the cheque to Grimshaw? .... IIRC when they got the
>£40 mill before it was Mr Loaf (aka Meatloaf) that did the honours.
The BBC report that the total cost of the project is £140m.
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 20:23:55 -0000, RG wrote:
> "Tom Crispin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:51:29 +0000, Steve
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7140621.stm
>>>
>>>Best of a bad bunch I guess, but some benefit is better than nothing.
>>
>> It won close to half the vote.
>
> ... what would be interesting, but I don't suppose it will be published, is
> the vote numbers the others got? My money would be on Eden as runner
> up and the other two way back down the track.
Possibly. It already had taken £60M of cash though, so I'm not sure why it
deserved more. Still, the Sherwood one was rubbish, even the locals
thought it was pretentious ********.
I'm not at all surprised that the project that would be of local benefit
to the most people won and I truly hope that Sustrans do a good job with
the cash.
Cheers,
Luke
--
Red Rose Ramblings, the diary of an Essex boy in
exile in Lancashire <http://www.shrimper.org.uk>
