......and don't forget the phone calls captured on film of USPS and CSC doing the deal in the 2004 TDF !
"Phone calls captured on film" ?limerickman said:......and don't forget the phone calls captured on film of USPS and CSC doing the deal in the 2004 TDF !
rejobako said:"Phone calls captured on film" ?
You guys are hilarious!
Ullefan said:How about Vinokourov attacking today, unbelievable!
tcklyde said:Great move by Vino today. Had a great chance at the stage today and a nice way to pick up some seconds on Armstrong.
Do you guys think that Vino went for it on his own, or was it sanctioned by Godefroot and T-Mobile??whiteboytrash said:It was a masterstroke because there was no way Disco/Armstrong was going to chase through the sprinters teams... it would of been to dangerous.... very smart move..... caught Armstrong napping...... there will be doubt in LA's mind as he will never know when Vino will attack... he can attack anywhere.......
strummer_fan said:Do you guys think that Vino went for it on his own, or was it sanctioned by Godefroot and T-Mobile??
Part of Jan's plan or just part of the plan for securing Vino's own Yellow Jersey hopes?
Sean
I imagine that T-Moblie is encouraged by today's result. But... I wouldn't want to be a DS trying to plan strategy for the upcoming days. It seems that LA's team is much like the wealthiest teams in other sports. They have packed their ranks with a lot of talent from across the board, so it can be hard to win attacks against them.Powerful Pete said:I think Vino is doing it on his own. Whether sanctioned or not, T-Mobile will not be yelling at him though. They have to be wondering about Jan and Kloden's performance, and given their budget they need to be seen in contention. So they will allow Vino to continue being a 'loose cannon'... everything Jan is not.
strummer_fan said:Do you guys think that Vino went for it on his own, or was it sanctioned by Godefroot and T-Mobile??
Part of Jan's plan or just part of the plan for securing Vino's own Yellow Jersey hopes?
Sean
MJtje said:Nope it was attack by himself I guess........he was in front and the sprinters teams were completely exhausted after a hard day pullin back that break.........so he had a go!
Well it turned out to be a very nice attack, but it could have turned out really bad. He won't do this a 2nd time!!!
IF he will attack again in the end of a sprinter stage LA won't follow.........then better lose some seconds instead of the chance that he crashes and that his TDF is over.....
It's all about who wants to take the biggest risks...........
Just another michael moore piece............limerickman said:Yeah, it is hilarious.
And proven.
But don't just take my word for it.
http://www.procycling.com/news.aspx?ID=1231
whiteboytrash said:read it and weep it was a T-Mobile move.......
http://www.procycling.com/news.aspx?ID=1371
Those Disco boys better think of some new ways to counter T-mobile... surly they can’t use the same tired formula as the last 487 years ?
What does this mean? That Vinokourov is the new team leader or that he and Ullrich will make alternate attacks, forcing Armstrong to match them and tiring him?whiteboytrash said:read it and weep it was a T-Mobile move.......
http://www.procycling.com/news.aspx?ID=1371
Those Disco boys better think of some new ways to counter T-mobile... surly they can’t use the same tired formula as the last 487 years ?
MJtje said:Jep I read it.........ooh yes they can use that tiredly formula........it's been effective huh the last 6 years
And btw IF Vino attacks early will Disco really be chasing as the only team or will CSC, Liberty, Rabo help, because he's also attacking there GC men. Think about that one............Vino could be digging his own grave with all those attacks.......
sonicman said:What does this mean? That Vinokourov is the new team leader or that he and Ullrich will make alternate attacks, forcing Armstrong to match them and tiring him?
Riiight. As is usual with this sort of nonsense, the "proof" only exists if you apply a lot of presumptions.limerickman said:Yeah, it is hilarious.
And proven.
But don't just take my word for it.
http://www.procycling.com/news.aspx?ID=1231
rejobako said:Riiight. As is usual with this sort of nonsense, the "proof" only exists if you apply a lot of presumptions.
"parts of a telephone conversation can be heard between the American and the Italian, who has shortly before learned about the seriousness of his mother’s cancer. Only Basso’s responses are heard, but at the end Basso tells Armstrong: “In this Tour – if you need something you just ask for it.”
So you only hear Basso talking, with no idea of the context of Armstrong's responses. You can assume, if it pleases you, that Basso's statement quoted above equates to a promise to defer to Armstrong in the GC race -- then again, maybe he was providing a general statement of support. I've often made statements to friends like: "You need anything, just let me know". That doesn't mean I'd give them my first-born if they asked for it.
As for this one:
"Later we see Basso talking to manager Bjarne Riis about a conversation he’s had with Armstrong, in which Armstrong has told Basso to if he stays close to him on Friday he’ll end far up on Saturday. “He wants to decide the Tour on the weekend,” Basso tells Riis."
I suppose this qualifies as at least innuendo, but not much else. Armstrong told a fellow rider that finishing close to him on a couple of mountain stages is a good idea. Good advice, in my opinion. Sounds more like wink-wink bravado than wink-wink conspiracy, but then again, I don't consider it sport to sit around and think of ways to try to diminish Armstrong's considerable achievements.
In other words, L-man, although I respect your opinions on this and many other issues, what your linked article "proves" is that Basso and Armstrong developed a rapport with each other in last years tour, possibly borne of the link between Armstrong's cancer and that of Basso's mother. I can buy the premise that perhaps Basso wasn't as motivated to try to beat Armstrong as he might have another rider, but as for a literal or tacit agreement to sandbag himself, I just don't see it.
Your point is taken to the extent that you have indeed convinced me that Armstrong and Basso's conversations were more involved than I had been aware, although as to your question of "why would they be talking to each other" -- it was reported by several sources last year that Armstrong, upon learning of Basso's mother's battle with pancreatic cancer, took it upon himself to talk to Basso about referrals to specific physicians, to lend support through his foundation, etc. A cynic would suggest his motivations were self-interested. Perhaps, but it does provide a plausible explanation of why the #1 and #2 GC contenders would be on the telephone, other than to swear a blood oath to each other.limerickman said:I only replied to your point because you attempted to diminish the point that there was something going on between LA and Basso at the 2004 TDF, by referring to it as being hilarious.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.