General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

The "Acid-Reducer" Scam

Started by Steve Wertz · · Last activity · 161 posts · 958 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
14 July 2007
Last activity
18 July 2007
Original author
Steve Wertz
Posts
161
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
958
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–40 of 161
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. "Steve Wertz" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:

    It took me all of about 8 minutes to look around proudly, grab my
    chocolate-covered coffee beans, my can of Riga smoked sprats,
    delete my cookies, and log into the D-Link wireless router and
    put blocks on hsn.com, myspace.com, and yahoo.com - where all my
    co-workers spend their time while I'm working my ass off.

    (They're gonna be [censored] and have to hire me back at the $120/hr
    I was charging them previously as a consultant).

    What kind of morons did you work for? Well, you said they
    were morons before. Any company will know to turn off your access
    before they drop the f-bomb on you. Shoot, I've known people who
    found out they were done when they couldn't access something and then
    the boss is asking to see them in their office.

    I hope you're back working soon.

    nancy


  2. Quoted message said:


    "Goomba38" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:

    And you'd be correct. Relaxation of the sphincter that keeps acids in
    your stomach and prevents them from backwashing up your esophagus is
    what GERD is about. I would suggest first trying to alter ones habits
    (not laying down after big meals or sleeping soon after eating) before
    trying to alter the acidity of the stomach for occasional reflux problems
    without other underlying issues.

    Good advice. I just recalled something else that helps to relax that
    sphincter and contributes to GERD--SSRIs like Prozac--and so many
    people are on these these days, they may be exacerbating the problem.

  3. "MOMPEAGRAM" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:

    Tums isn't very good unless you just want some calcium. Gaviscon is much
    better.

    From what I read when I had GERD, Gaviscon is the only OTC that acts
    as a physical block between the acid and your esophagus. That would have
    been my next line of defense if the reflux had not stopped. (Is there
    anything
    worse than waking up with a mouth full of stomach acid? Ugh!)

    Quoted message said:

    I'm a long time GERD person and I don't eat hot stuff.

    To be honest, a month ago was the first time I had hot wings in
    years. I loved not having reflux so much I simply lost my taste for
    them. (As Steve says, it may be the fat more than the spiciness, but
    whatever it was, it was the wings that really brought it on.)

    And I plan to be careful with them.

  4. "Omelet" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:

    Long term side effects in original studies indicated a significant
    increase in stomach cancer with test subjects.

    It's why I won't use it OTC now that it's been de-regulated.

    And I'm not one to panic over stuff like that as I realize that too many
    things are reputed to increase cancer risks, but I've read a LOT of PDR
    drug references, and that indicator is actually a pretty rare annotation.
    --

    I wondered why my doctor prescribed Protonix when all I saw on
    tv was the "little purple pill" [censored].

  5. Steve Wertz said:

    I admit - I was addicted to the cimetidine - ranitidine -
    famotadine stuff for 3-4 years. I usually had to take them once
    during the day, and always at night.

    <snip>

    Ahem. I didn't see this marked as OT: (and no, I don't use Outhouse Express)

    😉
    --
    Cheers
    Chatty Cathy

  6. On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 09:04:19 -0400, "Nancy Young" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    What kind of morons did you work for? Well, you said they
    were morons before. Any company will know to turn off your access
    before they drop the f-bomb on you. Shoot, I've known people who
    found out they were done when they couldn't access something and then
    the boss is asking to see them in their office.

    He *was* the tech guy who did that sort of thing when others were
    sacked, Nancy. You saw what he did before he left, right? 🙂

    --

    A husband is someone who takes out the trash and gives the impression he just cleaned the whole house.

  7. <sf> wrote

    Quoted message said:

    On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 09:04:19 -0400, "Nancy Young" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    What kind of morons did you work for? Well, you said they
    were morons before. Any company will know to turn off your access
    before they drop the f-bomb on you. Shoot, I've known people who
    found out they were done when they couldn't access something and then
    the boss is asking to see them in their office.

    He *was* the tech guy who did that sort of thing when others were
    sacked, Nancy. You saw what he did before he left, right? 🙂

    Yes, that's why you escort them out before they can cripple
    your system.

    nancy

  8. "Nancy Young" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    <sf> wrote

    Quoted message said:

    On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 09:04:19 -0400, "Nancy Young" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    What kind of morons did you work for? Well, you said they
    were morons before. Any company will know to turn off your access
    before they drop the f-bomb on you. Shoot, I've known people who
    found out they were done when they couldn't access something and then
    the boss is asking to see them in their office.

    He *was* the tech guy who did that sort of thing when others were
    sacked, Nancy. You saw what he did before he left, right? 🙂

    Yes, that's why you escort them out before they can cripple
    your system.

    That they did not just reinforces Steve's opinion that he worked for
    idiots. It is really hard working for idiots. They deserve what they get.

  9. "cybercat" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:

    "Nancy Young" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Yes, that's why you escort them out before they can cripple
    your system.

    Quoted message said:

    That they did not just reinforces Steve's opinion that he worked for
    idiots. It is really hard working for idiots. They deserve what they get.

    That's why I commented that Steve said they were morons.
    Obviously he's right.

    nancy

  10. Omelet said:

    So do you get to collect unemployment benefits for a bit? :-)

    I couldn't have any problems collecting unemployment. "Doesn't
    get along well with the boss" isn't a reason to refuse benefits.

    -sw

  11. Paco's Tacos said:

    Sounds like time to go fishin' up in the Santa Cruz mountains again! ;-)
    Watch out for them sharks, though! ;-)

    I actually do plan on going to San Jose soon. I probably won't
    get to Loch Lomond this time though. I'll be too busy pigging
    out on Vietnamese food.

    -sw

  12. Nancy Young said:

    What kind of morons did you work for? Well, you said they
    were morons before. Any company will know to turn off your access
    before they drop the f-bomb on you. Shoot, I've known people who
    found out they were done when they couldn't access something and then
    the boss is asking to see them in their office.

    I handle all the computer stuff there. Everyone else is pretty
    clueless about that. I have remote access, too.

    -sw

  13. Nancy Young said:

    Yes, that's why you escort them out before they can cripple
    your system.

    I think they were a little taken back by how well I took it. I
    was quite elated and smiling.

    Another good thing is now I can get free medical and dental.
    There's a few things I need to see the doc about.

    -sw

  14. Chatty Cathy said:
    Steve Wertz said:

    I admit - I was addicted to the cimetidine - ranitidine -
    famotadine stuff for 3-4 years. I usually had to take them once
    during the day, and always at night.

    <snip>

    Ahem. I didn't see this marked as OT: (and no, I don't use Outhouse Express)

    I wondered who was going to say it.

    If this were alt.food.professionals, then it might be OT. As
    this a recreational cooking group, we are expected to eat what we
    cook. And this is directly related to eating.

    So there :-P

    -sw

  15. "Steve Wertz" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:
    Nancy Young said:

    Yes, that's why you escort them out before they can cripple
    your system.

    I think they were a little taken back by how well I took it. I
    was quite elated and smiling.

    Hey, I think you did them a favor, locking out those features ...
    unless there is more you didn't tell ... they should thank you.
    Of course, they won't.

    Quoted message said:

    Another good thing is now I can get free medical and dental.
    There's a few things I need to see the doc about.

    More things? You're falling apart! Heh.

    nancy

  16. Steve Wertz said:
    Chatty Cathy said:
    Steve Wertz said:

    I admit - I was addicted to the cimetidine - ranitidine -
    famotadine stuff for 3-4 years. I usually had to take them once
    during the day, and always at night.


    <snip>

    Ahem. I didn't see this marked as OT: (and no, I don't use Outhouse Express)

    I wondered who was going to say it.

    I thought I'd give you and Goomba the day off...

    Quoted message said:


    If this were alt.food.professionals, then it might be OT. As
    this a recreational cooking group, we are expected to eat what we
    cook. And this is directly related to eating.

    So there :-P

    Also wondered who would say this.

    So there :-P

    Is there an echo in here?

    --
    Cheers
    Chatty Cathy

  17. Steve Wertz said:
    Omelet said:

    So do you get to collect unemployment benefits for a bit? :-)

    I couldn't have any problems collecting unemployment.


    ^^^^^^^^ shouldn't.

    Darn spell checker.

    -sw

  18. Nancy Young said:

    Hey, I think you did them a favor, locking out those features ...
    unless there is more you didn't tell ... they should thank you.
    Of course, they won't.

    There's only 5 employees in the whole company plus the owner.
    Err, 4 now. It's s small outfit. Everyone else are
    subcontractors (20+) that work outside the office.

    -sw

  19. In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:


    "Nancy Young" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    <sf> wrote

    Quoted message said:

    On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 09:04:19 -0400, "Nancy Young" <[email hidden]>
    wrote:

    >What kind of morons did you work for? Well, you said they
    >were morons before. Any company will know to turn off your access
    >before they drop the f-bomb on you. Shoot, I've known people who
    >found out they were done when they couldn't access something and then
    >the boss is asking to see them in their office.
    >

    He *was* the tech guy who did that sort of thing when others were
    sacked, Nancy. You saw what he did before he left, right? 🙂

    Yes, that's why you escort them out before they can cripple
    your system.

    That they did not just reinforces Steve's opinion that he worked for
    idiots. It is really hard working for idiots. They deserve what they get.

    You think idiots deserve what they get? That's rather harsh. With a few
    possible exceptions, people don't choose to be idiots any more than they
    choose to be black, female, or short.

    I'll also point out that when someone is validly fired for idiotic
    incompetence and nincompoopery, the first thing they do is accuse their
    bosses of being idiots. It's always someone else's fault with these
    people.

    --
    Peter Aitken

  20. "Peter A" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:


    "Nancy Young" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    <sf> wrote

    > On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 09:04:19 -0400, "Nancy Young" <[email hidden]>
    > wrote:
    >
    >>What kind of morons did you work for? Well, you said they
    >>were morons before. Any company will know to turn off your access
    >>before they drop the f-bomb on you. Shoot, I've known people who
    >>found out they were done when they couldn't access something and then
    >>the boss is asking to see them in their office.
    >>
    >
    > He *was* the tech guy who did that sort of thing when others were
    > sacked, Nancy. You saw what he did before he left, right? 🙂

    Yes, that's why you escort them out before they can cripple
    your system.

    That they did not just reinforces Steve's opinion that he worked for
    idiots. It is really hard working for idiots. They deserve what they get.

    You think idiots deserve what they get? That's rather harsh. With a few
    possible exceptions, people don't choose to be idiots any more than they
    choose to be black, female, or short.

    Fighting the good fight now, are we, Peter? 😄

    --
    Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.