Phil/Paul are definitely far too Lance/Discovery oriented, but that's what they get paid for. Some of their catchphrases are overused and thus annoying, but my biggest pet-peeve is their incessant use of superlatives: "incredible", "amazing", "fantastic", "unbelievable", etc. When something
truly amazing happens, they struggle to be able to describe it, because they've already used the word to tell us how quickly a flat got changed earlier.
All that being said, their voices are synonymous with cycling on American television, which is still rare enough that just hearing them gives me good vibes.
Even as a sometimes jingoistic American, Bob Roll is excruciating. He belongs on this forum, along with the rest of you who think everything Discovery/Lance is necessarily good or evil. When the 4 commentators were asked to predict the Tour winners, Roll went with an all-American podium. That's all anyone needs to know about how objective he is calling the race.
I'm going to defend Trautwig somewhat. He still knows less about cycling than my 6 year old daughter, but he knows a lot more than he did last year, when all he could do was whine about how boring the flat stages were.