Merckx. I'm biased of course, but I reckon he was more dominant than Bradman, who only had to beat a few pommies and curry munchers at the end of his career.Geoff Vadar said:See this is why so many people dont deserve a debate on what constitutes greatness. They dont even understand the concept in sporting terms. There is certain purity and integrity of spirit that reigns supreme in great people. Runs so pure that from the day they are born to the day they die they never see it in themselves.
They win if and only when it is right and just that they do so. They win not at all costs but at fair costs and on fair terms. To merely concern yourself with palmares is to misinterpret the task at hand.
Mockridge.
For further reading get this. I can lend it to you if you like but I better get it back or I will kill you.