OOooo!ColnagoC60 said:Since you are so stupid, that you can't read a drawing, how much force do you think it will take to separate a joint held together by a bolt torqued at 50Nm? That was a question you could not answer a few posts back, so I don't expect you will be any smarter now.
But let me guarantee you, the bearings and or assembly will tear apart and into pieces before that happens, or the slightest air gap happens.
Want me to calculate that for you in a few seconds?
I guess not, because you are so stupid, you will neither understand it, neither believe the number.
STILL ... ?ColnagoC60 said:Alf, I have obviously failed dismally in trying to educate an absolute idiot.
So I will no longer try, but to your question I will give you a clue.
Titanium has a higher tensile strength, to make sure this joint remains both safe and solid, why do you think Campy made sure you cannot fit a Titanium bolt in a steel crank, or a steel bolt in a titanium crank?
If you grasped that, perhaps it would lead you to sanity.
Ditch the roof rack and I'll let you in on a few suspension hints that'll not only make the ride better but will enable you to be in the running for an SCCA Regional title...CAMPYBOB said:Quote by Swami:
"So that's why you bought the bike instead of owning a ride that's Campag equipped"
I took a walk on the mild side. Now I'm looking for a fully prepped Miata with a hardtop and roof rack.
IT'S HARD TO BELIEVE ...CAMPYBOB said:Holy ****ing ****! Alf's STILL spewing the same moronic idiocy that he dreamed up 8 pages ago!
Alf, you're beyond reaching.
You have zero common sense, but you do have an ego the size of Montana. Just admit it...you're either insane or wrong.
Which is it?
There's nothing to measure. There is no reason to measure ANYTHING. NOT the BB width...NOT the Q-Factor...NOT the wave washer...NOTHING. The ****ing crankset either works without noise or it works with noise.
C60...did you notice, ALF STILL has not addressed the drawings, your pictures or our questions. In other words, all he is...is an egotistical liar. He's intellectually bankrupt and technically nothing more than a joke. Every time I think it's impossible for Alf to make an even bigger ass out of himself he exceeds all expectations of lunacy.
All the drawing (which is not that different from an exploded image of an Over Torque crankset) indicates is that YOU are the one who doesn't know what he is looking at.CAMPYBOB said:C60...did you notice, ALF STILL has not addressed the drawings, your pictures or our questions. In other words, all he is...is an egotistical liar. He's intellectually bankrupt and technically nothing more than a joke. Every time I think it's impossible for Alf to make an even bigger ass out of himself he exceeds all expectations of lunacy.
Hey ****stick,
Explain to the unwashed masses exactly how throwing away the wave washer (adds clearance), throwing away the bearing retaining clip AND narrowing the BB shell to precisely 86.000000000 MM (adds clearance) fixes the clicking noise which is caused by...too much clearance in the assembly?
Explain how you face mill your 'blueprinted' BB shell to ±.0002 tolerances and which tools, exactly, do you use to achieve those results and how do you measure it?
The connecting bolt connects the two halves together ...CAMPYBOB said:Explain how riders have not been killed by their 'air gaps' in the Hirth Joint.
Your question is proof that YOU don't know what YOU are looking at when you look at the exploded view of an Ultra Torque crankset AND SO it is little wonder why you may have had trouble deciphering the similar depiction of an Over Torque crankset ...CAMPYBOB said:Explain how long a milk jug washer can live under a bolt head torqued to 60 Nm.
Oh ...CAMPYBOB said:Explain how the **** you got to be so damned retarded in such a short time on the planet.
UMMmmmm ....CAMPYBOB said:Quote by C60:
"Holy **** Alf!!!
WTF did you have for breakfast this morning, a bottle of Russian Vodka, or was it something else?
Careful now, we don't want you to OD, just think of all the entertainment this forum will miss!!!!"
Booze...a lifetime of it...would explain away his idiocy.
Should you explain to ****stick 'why' your SR model has a 60 Nm spec and his has a 42 spec? Nah...let him continue making an ass out of himself.
This is precious!
"It's function would simply be to dampen the contact between the bolt & the driveside's spindle ..."
Dampen WHAT? You ****ing retard.
"And so, a "milk jug washer" can be as thin as gold foil."
Er...yeah. Gold foil should hold up even better than a milk jug when the torque is applied! LMFAO! Alf, is it booze? Drugs? Or just the most notorious case of Rectal-Cranial Inversion known to modern medicine?
YOU KNOW THE TUNE ...CAMPYBOB said:C60...can you believe he's still saying this:
"But, simple math indicates that the Hirth Coupling is separated by 1.0mm when the measurable Q-FACTOR is 145.5mm instead of 144.5mm ..."
I'm thinking he's got a 1 MM gap between neurons.
Alf, you're ****ing retarded. No one is failing to comprehend anything you've said and trust us on this...not a damned word of it makes sense.
Thanks ...ColnagoC60 said:Alfie, glad to see you edited that screwed up post where you posted the same picture three times sequentially, including some of your text.
You must be feeling better now, did the stuff you consumed wear off a litte?
BTW, there are absolutely no galling marks on my crank, the top coat is still 100% in tact without any marks or scratches.
What you are seeing in the picture is a reflection of the camera light showing the carbon layup underneath the clear coat. You almost had me there, I had to go look see, but can't see it with the naked eye.
Now you probably won't believe me, neither understand the above, but I am willing to post another picture, provided we wager a little bet about who is right about this. Some Dollars on the bet.
Are you in?
So Alfie, educate me a bit further.alfeng said:Thanks ...
But, it's not necessary to post another picture of the inside of your crank arm ...
I would hope that your prior-(or-current) inability to understand what I wrote would not mean you would lie about something so trivial ...
I just couldn't quite see what CAMPYBOB wanted me to comment on in the pictures you had posted other than those "marks" ...
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.