T
Tom Kunich
Guest
"Keith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 07:44:15 -0800, "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo.
> com> wrote:
>>
>>You do seem to be missing the point don't you? If there were no drugs then
>>Ullrich's NATURAL superior riding physique would have won him the tours.
>>There's absolutely no way that Pantani could have gotten anywhere near
>>Ullrich without drugs.
>
> Right, in a world without drugs, I think Ullrich would have thrashed
> the competition in ITTs so badly they would have never recovered,
> including LA.
I presume what you're implying is that Lance WAS using drugs which were
better than Ullrich's even though he was beneficiary of the East German
sports machine who did most of the drug research.
I suggest you get your head out of your nether regions and think about that.
news:[email protected]...
> On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 07:44:15 -0800, "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo.
> com> wrote:
>>
>>You do seem to be missing the point don't you? If there were no drugs then
>>Ullrich's NATURAL superior riding physique would have won him the tours.
>>There's absolutely no way that Pantani could have gotten anywhere near
>>Ullrich without drugs.
>
> Right, in a world without drugs, I think Ullrich would have thrashed
> the competition in ITTs so badly they would have never recovered,
> including LA.
I presume what you're implying is that Lance WAS using drugs which were
better than Ullrich's even though he was beneficiary of the East German
sports machine who did most of the drug research.
I suggest you get your head out of your nether regions and think about that.