H
Happy Oyster
Guest
<quote>
From: [email protected] (JDrew63929)
Subject: Re: Charter for MHA
Date: 1999/07/19
Message-ID: <[email protected]>#1/1
References:
<[email protected]>
Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com
Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative
X-Admin: [email protected]
>From: "A. Fox"
>On Sun, 18 Jul 1999, Edward Mathes wrote:
>
>> JDrew63929 wrote:
>>
>> > Tthis is exactly why I DIDN'T tell you of my tests long
>> > ago. I knew you wouldn't believe it even with PROOF.
>>
>> The problem, Jan, is the "proof".
>>
>> Loa Loa is transmitted by one species of fly found in
>> central and west
Africa. I
>> could find no reference to humna to human transmission.
>> Additionally, it
is a
>> cutaneous/opthalmologic condition and don't think it can
>> be found with
stool
>> studies.
>>
>> So, based on this, your Blue Mountain Lab report might be
>> inaccurate.
>>
>> Unless, of course, you hvae traveled to Africa.
>>
>> > You have proved me to be correct. You either disbelieve
>> > the lab, the doctor, or the study! I don't know
anything
>> > about loa loa, but I had others, besides them, and I
>> > SAW some for myself,
so
>> > why would I want another test?
>>
>> If you saw then yourself, jar them and take them to an
>> entomologisdt for identification.
>>
>> > You have forgotten how sick I was, how many trips I had
>> > taken to doctors and hospitals. I could barely get
>> > dressed to
go,
>> > so I am going to go in and start doubting a certain
>> > name of a parasite?
And you
>> > accuse me of not thinking things through? It appears
>> > you will find
anything ole
>> > thing to debate.
>>
>> I don't think you are listening to reason.
Reasoning? Sure glad none of you ever worked with kids!
>> What's better Jan...knowing the truth as truth or
>> beliveing a falsehood is
>truth?
>
>
>Precisely said, Jan. The fact that (you claim) the lab
>detected loiasis through a stool analysis calls the entire
>diagnosis into doubt.
>
>
>AF
Right. Anything you say it right. Right? We have been all
over this over and over. I do appreciate you and Ed calling
me a liar. Thanks. At any rate, the problem is cleared up
now, so don't let it bother you.
Jan </quote>
Regards,
Aribert Deckers
--
Reklame mit wahrheitswidrigen Behauptungen
http://www.ariplex.com/ama/ama_wies.htm
From: [email protected] (JDrew63929)
Subject: Re: Charter for MHA
Date: 1999/07/19
Message-ID: <[email protected]>#1/1
References:
<[email protected]>
Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com
Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative
X-Admin: [email protected]
>From: "A. Fox"
>On Sun, 18 Jul 1999, Edward Mathes wrote:
>
>> JDrew63929 wrote:
>>
>> > Tthis is exactly why I DIDN'T tell you of my tests long
>> > ago. I knew you wouldn't believe it even with PROOF.
>>
>> The problem, Jan, is the "proof".
>>
>> Loa Loa is transmitted by one species of fly found in
>> central and west
Africa. I
>> could find no reference to humna to human transmission.
>> Additionally, it
is a
>> cutaneous/opthalmologic condition and don't think it can
>> be found with
stool
>> studies.
>>
>> So, based on this, your Blue Mountain Lab report might be
>> inaccurate.
>>
>> Unless, of course, you hvae traveled to Africa.
>>
>> > You have proved me to be correct. You either disbelieve
>> > the lab, the doctor, or the study! I don't know
anything
>> > about loa loa, but I had others, besides them, and I
>> > SAW some for myself,
so
>> > why would I want another test?
>>
>> If you saw then yourself, jar them and take them to an
>> entomologisdt for identification.
>>
>> > You have forgotten how sick I was, how many trips I had
>> > taken to doctors and hospitals. I could barely get
>> > dressed to
go,
>> > so I am going to go in and start doubting a certain
>> > name of a parasite?
And you
>> > accuse me of not thinking things through? It appears
>> > you will find
anything ole
>> > thing to debate.
>>
>> I don't think you are listening to reason.
Reasoning? Sure glad none of you ever worked with kids!
>> What's better Jan...knowing the truth as truth or
>> beliveing a falsehood is
>truth?
>
>
>Precisely said, Jan. The fact that (you claim) the lab
>detected loiasis through a stool analysis calls the entire
>diagnosis into doubt.
>
>
>AF
Right. Anything you say it right. Right? We have been all
over this over and over. I do appreciate you and Ed calling
me a liar. Thanks. At any rate, the problem is cleared up
now, so don't let it bother you.
Jan </quote>
Regards,
Aribert Deckers
--
Reklame mit wahrheitswidrigen Behauptungen
http://www.ariplex.com/ama/ama_wies.htm