H
Howard Kveck
Guest
In article <[email protected]>,
"Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote:
> "Bill C" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > On Feb 9, 5:20 pm, "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote:
> >> "Bill C" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >>
> >> news:[email protected]...
> >>
> >> > I'm saying that I'm happy to be in the group of people TK calls scum.
> >>
> >> Where was that again?
> >
> > Follows on from this comment:
> >
> > I don't think we need continue any conversation with you as well. You,
> > Asher and Munro are little people that have a knack for making bananas
> > look particularly intelligent.
> >
> > Goes from there with your abuse of everyone who dares disagree with
> > you. At one point or another you've called everybody here nasty,
> > childish **** , and attempted to heap abuse on them when they didn't
> > agree with you.
> > Bill C
>
> So you actually made up that wording. Sort of like your arguments for
> anthropomorphic global warming.
Trying to evade the point by complaining that he used a word that you didn't,
aren't you? While it's true that you didn't use the word "scum" it's plenty obvious
from the tone of the comments you make about others in here who disagree with you
that you must think they're scum (or whatever word you choose that has equivalent
meaning). It's also patently obvious that you must think that your opnions are much
more valid than anyone else in here, based on the way you mock people for being
plumbers, carpenters, machinists or what-have-you. Which is hypocritical coming from
someone who (A) likes to accuse "Liberals" of being "elitists," and (B) has bragged
about being a high school drop out. I wouldn't mock you for being a drop out, but
certainly believe the average person would think that fact might give them pause for
thought before trying to imply that others are "beneath me." And your words in here
leave no doubt that you do think that many, if not most, *are* beneath you. "Little
people," indeed.
By the way, you complained that Tom Paterson couldn't stick to the subject, but
what the hell are you doing when you throw in some demand to know if I've ridden a
bike in the last ten years, which culminates in a statement about how many miles
you've ridden this year. It's the same thing as when you post a list of all the
bikes in your garage or claim that you have more guns than anyone here or are in the
top whatever percentage of wage earners in the Bay Area or any number of other
similar things. I'm not positive what the point of that stuff is, except to assume
that you believe it lends credence to whatever authority you're trying to present
yourself as. Uh huh... Maybe that stuff worked back in elementary school; here it's
just bizarre.
--
tanx,
Howard
Never take a tenant with a monkey.
remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?
"Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote:
> "Bill C" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > On Feb 9, 5:20 pm, "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote:
> >> "Bill C" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >>
> >> news:[email protected]...
> >>
> >> > I'm saying that I'm happy to be in the group of people TK calls scum.
> >>
> >> Where was that again?
> >
> > Follows on from this comment:
> >
> > I don't think we need continue any conversation with you as well. You,
> > Asher and Munro are little people that have a knack for making bananas
> > look particularly intelligent.
> >
> > Goes from there with your abuse of everyone who dares disagree with
> > you. At one point or another you've called everybody here nasty,
> > childish **** , and attempted to heap abuse on them when they didn't
> > agree with you.
> > Bill C
>
> So you actually made up that wording. Sort of like your arguments for
> anthropomorphic global warming.
Trying to evade the point by complaining that he used a word that you didn't,
aren't you? While it's true that you didn't use the word "scum" it's plenty obvious
from the tone of the comments you make about others in here who disagree with you
that you must think they're scum (or whatever word you choose that has equivalent
meaning). It's also patently obvious that you must think that your opnions are much
more valid than anyone else in here, based on the way you mock people for being
plumbers, carpenters, machinists or what-have-you. Which is hypocritical coming from
someone who (A) likes to accuse "Liberals" of being "elitists," and (B) has bragged
about being a high school drop out. I wouldn't mock you for being a drop out, but
certainly believe the average person would think that fact might give them pause for
thought before trying to imply that others are "beneath me." And your words in here
leave no doubt that you do think that many, if not most, *are* beneath you. "Little
people," indeed.
By the way, you complained that Tom Paterson couldn't stick to the subject, but
what the hell are you doing when you throw in some demand to know if I've ridden a
bike in the last ten years, which culminates in a statement about how many miles
you've ridden this year. It's the same thing as when you post a list of all the
bikes in your garage or claim that you have more guns than anyone here or are in the
top whatever percentage of wage earners in the Bay Area or any number of other
similar things. I'm not positive what the point of that stuff is, except to assume
that you believe it lends credence to whatever authority you're trying to present
yourself as. Uh huh... Maybe that stuff worked back in elementary school; here it's
just bizarre.
--
tanx,
Howard
Never take a tenant with a monkey.
remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?