On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 20:02:15 +0100, wafflycat wrote:
> Nathan did a TT this morning. Back at the HQ, Nathan, Vernon & I were
> chatting to another rider. Facing me, and behind Vernon was another rider,
> getting changed in the main hall (not the loos). Put it this way, when he
> was getting changed out of his shorts, it was *clear* and *obvious* he'd
In our society, the convention is that people have to wear clothes. Some
bits of the body are considered 'rude'. Some people would argue that these
standards are ridiculous (including but not limited to nudists and
naturists, for example). If he's a grown man, I think that he should have
obeyed convention in this case. His 'freedom' to walk around naked in
public might conflict with other people's 'freedom' to hold adult nudity
with a special regard.
Unfortunately, in this case, I think that you are going to encounter a lot
of 'Guardian Reader' style sophisticates who will attempt to brow-beat you
by trying to assure you that you are not as mature or sophisticated as they
are. They've seen it all before and would barely raise an eye brow (or
anything else) in the same situation.
You've got two kids so, I should imagine that you aren't entirely sexually
inexperienced either. Like nearly all people in our society, you probably
assign special meaning to adult nudity. I do too. If an adult woman got
undressed in front of me, it would probably have some effect on me. The
problem is, I'm only 29 and I don't want to be as 'sophisticated' as the
people who've seen it all before.
Isn't it interesting that the most well know allegorical children's fable
about brow-beating is actually The Emperor's New Clothes?
--
***My real address is m/ike at u/nmusic d/ot co dot u/k (removing /s)
http://www.unmusic.co.uk - about me, music, geek sitcom etc.
http://www.unmusic.co.uk/amh-s-faq.html - alt.music.home-studio
http://www.unmusic.co.uk/ukodb - uk outdoor bargain noticeboard.