I reckon they're handy for the front derailer. I've never been able to work out a reliable way of getting the cable correct up front without an adjuster. How do you go about it Thylo?Thylacine said:Yeah, there's an adjuster on the end of the rear derailleur, so I never did work out why the hell you needed those, even after being scolded by the LBS in a recent build for not putting them on.
Yes, that's my bestest steed. The frame is a cast-off from a mate who upgraded to a carbon jobbie. And since I put on the Ultegra "with internal routing goodness (TM Llama)" shifters, it's the perfect granddad's axe. It was once a CAAD5 Cannondale 9 speed. Now there's not a single original component.531Aussie said:Is that yours? Nice. I love BMCs, so it's a pitty I hated the Streetfire I owned a few years ago.
paulambry said:I reckon they're handy for the front derailer. I've never been able to work out a reliable way of getting the cable correct up front without an adjuster.
That would be a "hello boys" followed by an "inverted crazy date" and a "double battered sav".gplama said:Your pic - Fail.
Here are some better ones...
stevebaby said:That would be a "hello boys" followed by an "inverted crazy date" and a "double battered sav".
how does it compare to your Cannondale? I thought your grey Cannondale was a Caad 8 or 9?paulambry said:Yes, that's my bestest steed. The frame is a cast-off from a mate who upgraded to a carbon jobbie. And since I put on the Ultegra "with internal routing goodness (TM Llama)" shifters, it's the perfect granddad's axe. It was once a CAAD5 Cannondale 9 speed. Now there's not a single original component.
Was it? You'd be right, given that I'm inumerate. Not that it really matters. The main bits of all the Cannodale CAAD frames were identical. The only differences, as far as I could ever work out, were the Ionic curly bits added to style the seat stays on the later CAADs.531Aussie said:how does it compare to your Cannondale? I thought your grey Cannondale was a Caad 8 or 9?
paulambry said:Was it? You'd be right, given that I'm inumerate. Not that it really matters. The main bits of all the Cannodale CAAD frames were identical. The only differences, as far as I could ever work out, were the Ionic curly bits added to style the seat stays on the later CAADs.
The Cannondale was stiffer. No question. I think mainly because the forks are pretty hefty. And perhaps because the chainstays are quite generous on the Cannondale.
They both weigh about the same. Nothing spesh there.
I loved the Cannondale more. All one material. Being the hopeless luddite I am, I'm just not a fan of gluing plastic to metal. Besides, the carbon seat stays on the BMC don't make the bike stronger... not any stiffer than it would be with alloy stays. And the bollox about making the ride smoother, is, well, bollox. I mean, if your seat stays are flexing enough to give you some sort of suspension, I would imagine your seat stays are farked. N'est-ce pas?
I suspect one's SBRs(tm) might benefit from a long seat post, more than any variation on the stays, material, glues or Ionic embelishments. My first real road bike was a compact frame with a long seat post, and I know my fat a r s e was tres comfortable on the end of that arrangement. Less so when the seat was on.Thylacine said:The 'argument' with carbon is that the flex is interstitial - meaning there is some degree of 'flex' between the carbon and the resin - but I just think material is almost irrelevant. It's about how a given design resonates and how that sensation is picked up by your Sensitive Butt Receptors.™
In violent agreement with you Llamie. But, this question remains... "I've never been able to work out a reliable way of getting the cable correct up front without an adjuster."gplama said:I reckon they'd be handy if you've bent the **** out of a fd or rd in a ride, or race.. But if if you've dinged your bike that hard, its time to limp home.... I also find after a few shifts the barrel goes back to its original position. I did away with them on the race bike (DA7900 jobbie) and had no problems, yet.
Thylacine said:...
Which reminds me - I need to buy some pickled Jalapenos.
gplama said:...New Shimano gear...
cs124 said:What's the "build quality" of the 7900 like after it has been ridden for a while?
hmm, I see. I want a Cannondalepaulambry said:Was it? You'd be right, given that I'm inumerate. Not that it really matters. The main bits of all the Cannodale CAAD frames were identical. The only differences, as far as I could ever work out, were the Ionic curly bits added to style the seat stays on the later CAADs.
The Cannondale was stiffer. No question. I think mainly because the forks are pretty hefty. And perhaps because the chainstays are quite generous on the Cannodale.
They both weigh about the same. Nothing spesh there.
I loved the Cannodale more. All one material. Being the hopeless luddite I am, I'm just not a fan of gluing plastic to metal. Besides, the carbon seat stays on the BMC don't make the bike stronger... not any stiffer than it would be with alloy stays. And the bollox about making the ride smoother, is, well, bollox. I mean, if your seat stays are flexing enough to give you some sort of suspension, I would imagine your seat stays are farked. N'est-ce pas?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.