The Thread about Nothing....



This is probably blasphemy, but I don't like the old Mustangs that sit high at the front.
 
700
 
paulambry said:
Bit hard to see how much faster the Porsche is with so much (retarded) traffic on the track. Love the way it becomes a dot on the big sweeper.
The RSR's were pretty lightweight so that gives it a big advantage right there. The old Camaros handle like oil tankers in a hurricane - you need to go for a complete tube frame setup for them to handle remotely well. I like the way the RSR gets hauled back in on the few straights were there's not that much traffic :p Sad fact is, you could probably get a 2003 Boxster S, sell that engine and for a few $'s more bolt in a Carrera 3.6 motor. That'd probably take down both of those cars...:p I'd need to get my rear gear changed before contemplating a track day - it tops out around 110 mph but if I did that it'd mean that I'd actually have to start using 2nd and 3rd on the street. I like being lazy and relying on the torque to allow me to just go 1st to 4th at times and not even having to rev the engine much in 1st either. On the plus side. The back is getting better - might be able to get something done this week. It might just be getting the fuel tank in and making/running the fuel lines (all work done laying on my back and not bending over) but it'd be a start. I might just go pull the tank out of the box and stick 12V on it to hear the pump run for a second. Mmmm. Toys :)
 
531Aussie said:
This is probably blasphemy, but I don't like the old Mustangs that sit high at the front.  
I like the original Mustangs, especially the fastback. Not sure what prices are like of the late 60s ones that weren't considered collectable a few years back.
 
Originally Posted by swampy1970


I like the original Mustangs, especially the fastback. Not sure what prices are like of the late 60s ones that weren't considered collectable a few years back.
Until a few minutes ago, I was under the impression that they all cost a fortune down here, but I was wrong

This one's 42 grand

http://www.carsales.com.au/private/details/Ford-Mustang-1965/SSE-AD-3009163/?gts=SSE-AD-3009163&gtssaleid=SSE-AD-3009163


$19,000:


http://www.carsales.com.au/private/details/Ford-Mustang-1966/SSE-AD-2535686/?Cr=0&sdmvc=1


$35,000:


http://www.carsales.com.au/dealer/details/Ford-Mustang-1966/AGC-AD-16500501/?Cr=1&sdmvc=1


$33,000


http://www.carsales.com.au/private/details/Ford-Mustang-1966/SSE-AD-3025209/?Cr=2&sdmvc=1


$25,000


http://www.carsales.com.au/private/details/Ford-Mustang-1967/SSE-AD-2914975/?Cr=3&sdmvc=1


$65,000:


http://www.carsales.com.au/private/details/Ford-Mustang-1968/SSE-AD-2222730/?Cr=5&sdmvc=1


But this gt is $185,000


http://www.carsales.com.au/private/details/Ford-Mustang-1967/SSE-AD-2885529/?Cr=4&sdmvc=1

Etc, etc: http://www.carsales.com.au/all-cars/results.aspx?silo=stock&q=((((((((SiloType%3d%5bBrand+new+cars+in+stock%5d)%7c(SiloType%3d%5bBrand+new+cars+available%5d))%7c(SiloType%3d%5bDemo+and+near+new+cars%5d))%7c(SiloType%3d%5bDealer+used+cars%5d))%7c(SiloType%3d%5bDemo+and+near+new+cars%5d))%7c(SiloType%3d%5bPrivate+seller+cars%5d))%26(Service%3d%5bCarsales%5d))%26(CarAll%3dkeyword%5bmustang%5d))&vertical=car&sortby=TopDeal
 
Originally Posted by swampy1970


A 351 Cleveland motor, nice. One of my wife's best friends married a Ford fanboy - he had a Mach 1 Mustang with a 351c in it. Apparently, it accelerated that fast that it ripped the drivers seat off the seat rails and it ended up in a tree... The replacement Mach1 (the second year, with out functional brake scoops) wasn't quite so heavily modified. I had a ride in that one back in 2001. It kinda got me hooked on old school cars.

Interesting intake you have on that. Going for high rpm HP? I'd like something interesting like that but I just don't have the bonnet clearance.

The engine I have is a ZZ502 crate motor. Literally, it was delivered in a crate with everything preassembled. Dizzy had to come out and the oil filter had to be removed - but it's a modern incarnation of a Mark IV chevy big block. The stamped steel rockers came with it but alas roller rockers won't fit the stock valve covers. The stock valve covers barely clear the brake booster... You can see where I'm going with this...

Those rockers are good for 800hp, more than enough for me. The EFI is good for 850hp. I'm just going for the EFI for throttle response - the torque curve is already near linear and flat with about 4,000 rpm over 500 lb/ft. The rear end is good for 1300 lb/ft of torque at the wheels in 1st gear - which is more than I'll make at the flywheel.

I have plans to replace the front disk brakes and brake booster at "some point" (sometime between now and dinosaurs re-roaming the earth). An oddity - the rear drums are sized for a Ford Gran Torino - the largest passenger drum brakes commonly available. Going for that sleeper look.
"It was, and always shall be, a 5.75 liter motor that in 1971 was capable of competing on equal ground with hemi headed 7 liter motors. With the same 0.6" lift endurance cams, at the same rpm, with the same carburetion, the 351 cubic inch Ford made equal horsepower as the FE427, the Boss 429, the 426 Hemi and the 421 Super Duty. It could power a Torino around the super ovals like Taladega and Daytona at equal speed, and with equal reliability as the big blocks. It could cruise around a super oval at 7200 rpm all day long without breaking. It did this with a thin cast block, no side oiling, no steel crank. The 351C 4V was assembled on an assembly line at 20% of the cost of a Boss 429 or the 427 FE." - 351Cleveland.net forum.

Here in OZ we put them in family sedans and raced them at Bathurst.



When I built that motor that was the best manifold available for my combination. Certainly better than the old school dual and single plane manifolds. The motor makes around 480 hp at 6200 rpm and would be better off with one of the new generation hi-rise dual plane manifolds that have been developed since. It's a bit of a sad story regrading these manifolds as the guy that developed them was put out of business by cheap and nasty Chinese rip-offs of his own manifolds.

Do those rockers have roller tips? We found that the big problem with using pressed rockers on Clevos which have canted valves just like the BBC wasn't the rockers which were plenty strong enough but the lack of roller tips which meant that sideways forces were transmitted to the valves and guides. The valves would develop enough sideways play that you could feel it with you fingers and see it with your eyes. Will the double rocker cover gasket trick give you enough clearance for roller rocker? If you look at the above photos you will see that is what we did. Gee I could go insane on a Clevo build now with a bit more cash and greater part availability. Siamese block + stroker kit = 434 ci. Add 3V heads and manifold plus a solid roller camshaft and you are looking at 700+ hp with pump fuel or a bit less with a hydraulic roller camshaft. Still it would be $20k.

My suggestion with the front brakes is to make sure you can still fit 15" wheels on it. These older cars look a bit weird with non-period wheels especially wheels with a big diameter. My car has factory four wheel disc brakes which is pretty impressive for the early 70's.

What diff ratio does it have? I quite like 3.5:1 and you should still be fine doing the 1st to 4th gear shift whilst keeping your sanity at highway speeds. I do the 1st to 4th shift all the time and your donk will have more torque than mine. Did it originally have a 10 bolt? I put a factory 10 bolt in my first car which was a 1970 Kingswood and I later put an Auburn LSD in it which I picked up whilst in Hawaii. It sure had the security guys puzzled when they inspected my bags at the airport. It didn't have c-clips but it did spit one axle and brake another. I ended up running 9" axles in it.

Regarding the 502 Chev, my first experience with them was in the late 80's when I skied behind this boat. It had something like 1200 hp. Up until then it was just 454 Chevs. The blocks were always Mercruiser blocks.
 
Regarding the 502 Chev, my first experience with them was in the late 80's when I skied behind this boat. It had something like 1200 hp. Up until then it was just 454 Chevs. The blocks were always Mercruiser blocks.
Just goes to show... too much is never enough. Ree-****-lee-ous!
 
So who's coming to Fiji in a few weeks? Time to rock the Tour of Fiji.... and get in a holiday, and warm weather!

Looks like I might finally get to meet @::dom:: too (who hasn't used these forums in a LONG time, so hopefully this summons him back to the TAN :)
 
Originally Posted by gplama
So who's coming to Fiji in a few weeks? Time to rock the Tour of Fiji.... and get in a holiday, and warm weather!

Looks like I might finally get to meet @::dom:: too (who hasn't used these forums in a LONG time, so hopefully this summons him back to the TAN :)
A looooong time.... took me a while to remember my password. Look forward to seeing you GPL.... it's good to back in TAN.
 
531Aussie said:
Until a few minutes ago, I was under the impression that they all cost a fortune down here, but I was wrong This one's 42 grand http://www.carsales.com.au/private/details/Ford-Mustang-1965/SSE-AD-3009163/?gts=SSE-AD-3009163&gtssaleid=SSE-AD-3009163 $19,000: http://www.carsales.com.au/private/details/Ford-Mustang-1966/SSE-AD-2535686/?Cr=0&sdmvc=1 $35,000: http://www.carsales.com.au/dealer/details/Ford-Mustang-1966/AGC-AD-16500501/?Cr=1&sdmvc=1 $33,000 http://www.carsales.com.au/private/details/Ford-Mustang-1966/SSE-AD-3025209/?Cr=2&sdmvc=1 $25,000 http://www.carsales.com.au/private/details/Ford-Mustang-1967/SSE-AD-2914975/?Cr=3&sdmvc=1 $65,000: http://www.carsales.com.au/private/details/Ford-Mustang-1968/SSE-AD-2222730/?Cr=5&sdmvc=1 But this gt is $185,000 http://www.carsales.com.au/private/details/Ford-Mustang-1967/SSE-AD-2885529/?Cr=4&sdmvc=1 Etc, etc: http://www.carsales.com.au/all-cars/results.aspx?silo=stock&q=((((((((SiloType%3d%5bBrand+new+cars+in+stock%5d)%7c(SiloType%3d%5bBrand+new+cars+available%5d))%7c(SiloType%3d%5bDemo+and+near+new+cars%5d))%7c(SiloType%3d%5bDealer+used+cars%5d))%7c(SiloType%3d%5bDemo+and+near+new+cars%5d))%7c(SiloType%3d%5bPrivate+seller+cars%5d))%26(Service%3d%5bCarsales%5d))%26(CarAll%3dkeyword%5bmustang%5d))&vertical=car&sortby=TopDeal
Nice cars, but the GT - it comes down to whether you "need" to have the real deal or would prefer to use modern stuff and some well placed stickers down the side of the car and have something that looks about the same but drives and goes better.
 
wow. Fast course, too.

http://www.cyclingnews.com/races/uci-road-world-championships-2014/mens-elite-individual-time-trial/results