D
Donovan Rebbech
Guest
In article <[email protected]>, Bill-always hard-Rodgers wrote:
> "Seem to provide" is the key. Although stiffer feeling than most Nikes, Asics probably provides
> far more protection to your feet. Cushioning is responsible for an awful lot of injuries because
> cushioning equals instability, ESPECIALLY in Nikes. NB feel like they have a marble under my feet,
> but some people like them. Go to a good running store with qualified people.
FWIW, I checked out the shoes in the shop, and I'm really impressed with the feel of the Asics line.
A nice firm cushion, not spongy like some of the other shoes (the biggest offender was the Brooks
Glygerin). Since I've worked with AT problems, the last thing I want is spongy shoes.
Cheers,
--
Donovan Rebbechi http://pegasus.rutgers.edu/~elflord/
> "Seem to provide" is the key. Although stiffer feeling than most Nikes, Asics probably provides
> far more protection to your feet. Cushioning is responsible for an awful lot of injuries because
> cushioning equals instability, ESPECIALLY in Nikes. NB feel like they have a marble under my feet,
> but some people like them. Go to a good running store with qualified people.
FWIW, I checked out the shoes in the shop, and I'm really impressed with the feel of the Asics line.
A nice firm cushion, not spongy like some of the other shoes (the biggest offender was the Brooks
Glygerin). Since I've worked with AT problems, the last thing I want is spongy shoes.
Cheers,
--
Donovan Rebbechi http://pegasus.rutgers.edu/~elflord/