The way to break out of the pro-car, anti-car debate?



"Plodder" <CORNED BEEF@NOSPAM> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Roger wrote:
>
> > > Why don't we do it in the road?
> > > A new school of traffic design says we should get rid of stop signs

and
> > red
> > > lights and let cars, bikes and people mingle together. It sounds

insane,
> > but
> > > it works.
> > >

> > Interesting concept which does not work - fatality accidents and serious
> > injury accidents throughout countries which have next to no road rules

are
> > horrendous once out of the low speed congested areas. City traffic flows

> at
> > the speed of the bikes therefore any impacts are low speed and end up

with
> a
> > few harsh words and maybe a skinned knuckle.
> >
> > As for trying it in Aus - our traffic moves faster - we dont have

> congested
> > roads by any world standard - you can drive at 100kph and be expected to
> > stop - bikes are a name for an easy woman.

>
> I agree, the concept probably wouldn't work outside of cities and suburban
> areas, especially in Aus where people travel many kilometers at high

speeds
> as a matter of course. Nevertheless, I see no reason why the concept
> couldn't work in residential areas. Why not an artery system of major

roads
> retaining current road rules for high-speed, long-distance travel,

changing
> to the "intrigue" concept in city and residential streets? You can get to
> where you want fast and when you get there, you slow down. Doesn't seem
> hard...
>
> Frank
>

I drove in France when the give way to the right rule was applied on
practically every road - ie travelling along a main road and a poxy little
one lane side road with a tractor/2CV/herd of goats would just come straight
out. The accidents were horrendous - but probably did more to reduce the
collective IQ of the French.

As for my previous post about congested roads in Aus - is there one
Australian city that takes longer than 1 hour in peak hour traffic to cross?
Paris used to take about 4 hours in normal traffic, London at least 2 from
the end of the M1 to the M23, Amsterdam - just one long congested road from
Rotherdam to Amsterdam, Brusselles the queues started in Oostende.
 
Roger Martin wrote:

.....snip.....

> As for my previous post about congested roads in Aus - is there one
> Australian city that takes longer than 1 hour in peak hour traffic to cross?


Yes, Sydney has been this way for decades.
 
"Charlie" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>>

> sure :)
> It did sound like you were suggesting the examination of processes
> without any understanding of the consequences (which leads to wild,
> invented conclusions of 0 value, imho) to be posessing of merit though.
> But I accept that's not what you meant...
>
> Charlie


Thank you... nice to have a recognition (not necessarily agreement!) instead
of the usual defensive stuff when a statement is questioned (OK... I'm
guilty too!).

Cheers,

Frank
 
"Terry Collins" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]
> Roger Martin wrote:
>
> ....snip.....
>
>> As for my previous post about congested roads in Aus - is there one
>> Australian city that takes longer than 1 hour in peak hour traffic
>> to cross?

>
> Yes, Sydney has been this way for decades.


And Melbourne.

--

A: Top-posters.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?
 
In article <[email protected]>,
"DRS" <[email protected]> wrote:

> I want to know the sources


You might start here: <http://www.factbook.net/EGRF_Summary.htm>. Including tidbits like: "For instance, the actual number of China¹s
road deaths has been estimated by the official Beijing Traffic
Engineering Research Institute to be over 40 per cent greater than that
reported in official statistics."

--
Shane Stanley
 
DRS wrote:
>
> "D Walford" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]
> > DRS wrote:
> >>
> >> Why don't we do it in the road?
> >> A new school of traffic design says we should get rid of stop signs
> >> and red lights and let cars, bikes and people mingle together. It
> >> sounds insane, but it works.

> >
> > Does it, the articles seems to ignore the huge amount of death and
> > injury on Chinese roads, a friend who recently did 2 trips to China
> > says that the death and injury rate there is horrendous.

>
> Cites?
>
> > He also said that car travel in Shanghi is so slow its quicker to walk
> > provided you are willing to take the risk of breathing the severely
> > polluted air.

>
> Maybe that's so, yet how does he explain away the empirical evidence coming
> out of Europe to the contrary?
>


I didn't mention Europe, traffic in Asia already uses the "anything
goes" traffic managemant system and the traffic jams and death and
injury rates are very serious problems by Australian standards.
I can see such a system working in a congested inner urban area, even
maybe in the CBD of a major Australian city but in outer urban areas
where traffic moves a lot faster IMO it would be a disaster.
Roundabouts are a current example of the chaos theory, no one seems to
know the rules and the ones that do don't give a **** so if you get
through one without getting hit or abused you consider yourself lucky:)
I wonder how large trucks fit into the theory?
Their size means they always have right of way over anything smaller,
I'm being to like this idea:)



Daryl
 
On 26 May 2004 21:41:29 +1000, ? the Platypus {aka David Formosa}
<[email protected]> wrote:

>sheik yerbouti <[email protected]> writes:
>
>[...]
>
>> are you serious? their road death rates are many times ours

>
>And in what terms? Deaths per head of population?


if you look at my post above, you'll see china's death rate is many
times ours.

i assume it's corrected for no. of motor vehicles, if not they have an
even more horrific record
 
"sheik yerbouti" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]
> On 26 May 2004 21:41:29 +1000, ? the Platypus {aka David Formosa}
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> sheik yerbouti <[email protected]> writes:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> are you serious? their road death rates are many times ours

>>
>> And in what terms? Deaths per head of population?

>
> if you look at my post above, you'll see china's death rate is many
> times ours.


You haven't provided a shred of evidence to support your claim.

--

A: Top-posters.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?
 
"DRS" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
> "sheik yerbouti" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]
> > On 26 May 2004 21:41:29 +1000, ? the Platypus {aka David Formosa}
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> sheik yerbouti <[email protected]> writes:
> >>
> >> [...]
> >>
> >>> are you serious? their road death rates are many times ours
> >>
> >> And in what terms? Deaths per head of population?

> >
> > if you look at my post above, you'll see china's death rate is many
> > times ours.

>
> You haven't provided a shred of evidence to support your claim.



Sorry to just jump in, but I just typed "death rates auto accidents
china" into google and it spat out this:
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/FC26Ad01.html
It doesn't mention Australia per se but, and I could be wrong, but I
think the US death rates are higher than ours, and this article states
that China's rate of deaths per 10000 autos is eight times that of the
States. Of course, they cite a major cause (12%) as being due to
crappy workmanship. Hope it helps.
 
"blah" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]
> "DRS" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:<[email protected]>...
>> "sheik yerbouti" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]
>>> On 26 May 2004 21:41:29 +1000, ? the Platypus {aka David Formosa}
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> sheik yerbouti <[email protected]> writes:
>>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>>> are you serious? their road death rates are many times ours
>>>>
>>>> And in what terms? Deaths per head of population?
>>>
>>> if you look at my post above, you'll see china's death rate is many
>>> times ours.

>>
>> You haven't provided a shred of evidence to support your claim.

>
> Sorry to just jump in,


Don't apologize for that, there's no such thing as "jumping in" on Usenet.

> but I just typed "death rates auto accidents
> china" into google and it spat out this:
> http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/FC26Ad01.html
> It doesn't mention Australia per se but, and I could be wrong, but I
> think the US death rates are higher than ours, and this article states
> that China's rate of deaths per 10000 autos is eight times that of the
> States. Of course, they cite a major cause (12%) as being due to
> crappy workmanship. Hope it helps.


You've missed my point. Shane Stanley has already posted a link to what are
probably the best statistics on this issue. My point is that this ******
"sheik yerbouti" never backs his claims up with links or cites. In his
"post above" he in fact does not show that "china's death rate is many times
ours". In response to my request for sources he merely stated "are you
serious? their road death rates are many times ours". That's it. He's
never produced a shred of actual evidence and shows no sign of ever doing
so.

--

A: Top-posters.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?
 
Drs wrote:
> You've missed my point. Shane Stanley has already posted a link to what
> are probably the best statistics on this issue. My point is that this
> ****** "sheik yerbouti" never backs his claims up with links or cites.
> In his "post above" he in fact does not show that "china's death rate is
> many times ours". In response to my request for sources he merely stated
> "are you serious? their road death rates are many times ours". That's
> it. He's never produced a shred of actual evidence and shows no sign of
> ever doing so.




actually by my ruff maff, China's roadtoll isnt that horrendous compared
to population (or per head) China 1.6billion people > roadtoll 100,000
people Oz 20million(guesstimate) Toll 1300

Their per head figure is only marginally higher than ours, but their car
ownership is miniscule compared to ours too! So look forward to their
toll going ahead leaps and bounds, me thinks:rolleyes:



--
 
>You've missed my point. Shane Stanley has already posted a link to what are
>probably the best statistics on this issue. My point is that this ******
>"sheik yerbouti" never backs his claims up with links or cites. In his
>"post above" he in fact does not show that "china's death rate is many times
>ours". In response to my request for sources he merely stated "are you
>serious? their road death rates are many times ours". That's it. He's
>never produced a shred of actual evidence and shows no sign of ever doing
>so.


from the link that was provided by shane stanley:

reported fatality rates:
china - 26.1
australia - 1.8

clearly australia is *far* safer than china, in terms of road safety.

you say "He's never produced a shred of actual evidence and shows no
sign of ever doing so.", well here it is.

you say " My point is that this ****** "sheik yerbouti" never backs
his claims up with links or cites", well here i am, backing it up.

now kiss my ****
 
"sheik yerbouti" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]
>> You've missed my point. Shane Stanley has already posted a link to
>> what are probably the best statistics on this issue. My point is
>> that this ****** "sheik yerbouti" never backs his claims up with
>> links or cites. In his "post above" he in fact does not show that
>> "china's death rate is many times ours". In response to my request
>> for sources he merely stated "are you serious? their road death
>> rates are many times ours". That's it. He's never produced a shred
>> of actual evidence and shows no sign of ever doing so.

>
> from the link that was provided by shane stanley:
>
> reported fatality rates:
> china - 26.1
> australia - 1.8
>
> clearly australia is *far* safer than china, in terms of road safety.
>
> you say "He's never produced a shred of actual evidence and shows no
> sign of ever doing so.", well here it is.
>
> you say " My point is that this ****** "sheik yerbouti" never backs
> his claims up with links or cites", well here i am, backing it up.
>
> now kiss my ****


In your dreams. *You* never provided anything but bald assertions.

--

A: Top-posters.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?
 
flyingdutch <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
> Blah wrote:
> > Sorry for apologising :)

>
>
>
> stop that!
>

(clears throat, readying for the big punchline)...(slight pause as
anticiaption builds)... "Sorry." (crowd erupts in laughter and
spontaneous applause)
 
Drs wrote:
> In your dreams. *You* never provided anything but bald assertions.




and yet he's backed it up now, so just kiss (maybe not in the
aforementioned way tho :D) and make up!

[AustinPowersVoice] Yeah baby, yeah [/AustinPowersVoice]

and for lordy's sake, stop arguing about everything:D Just ride, darn it

PS what were those new tyres you imported?



--
 
On Fri, 28 May 2004 04:50:01 +1000, "DRS"
<[email protected]> wrote:


>>
>> reported fatality rates:
>> china - 26.1
>> australia - 1.8
>>
>> clearly australia is *far* safer than china, in terms of road safety.
>>
>> you say "He's never produced a shred of actual evidence and shows no
>> sign of ever doing so.", well here it is.
>>
>> you say " My point is that this ****** "sheik yerbouti" never backs
>> his claims up with links or cites", well here i am, backing it up.
>>
>> now kiss my ****

>
>In your dreams. *You* never provided anything but bald assertions.


the evidence is staring at you, at the top of this post. are you blind
or just stupid, or both?

you can clearly see that chinese traffic is far less safe than in
australia. do you want it spelled out in a more simple fashion? what
aren't you getting?
 
"flyingdutch" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]
> Drs wrote:
> > In your dreams. *You* never provided anything but bald assertions.

>
> and yet he's backed it up now, so just kiss (maybe not in the
> aforementioned way tho :D) and make up!


Yeah, by using statistics from a link someone else provided.

> [AustinPowersVoice] Yeah baby, yeah [/AustinPowersVoice]
>
> and for lordy's sake, stop arguing about everything:D Just ride, darn
> it


This is Usenet.

> PS what were those new tyres you imported?


Avocet Fasgrip Duro Plus K 700x32.

--

A: Top-posters.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?
 

Similar threads