Road Cycling · Public discussion

This Doping Announcement BS is [censored]

Started by RonSonic · · Last activity · 4 posts · 394 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
27 July 2006
Last activity
28 July 2006
Original author
RonSonic
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
394
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Can I just say that this preannouncement announcement that someone somewhere in
    the peloton appears to have tested positive on one of several required tests is
    stupid, counterproductive and just plain bad for the sport.

    All the antidoping zealots who wonder how and why their cause has been accused
    of being destructive to the sport can sit and gaze at this glorious disgrace as
    an example.

    I am not pro dope, but if this is what anti-doping means then you can shove it
    up your ass.

    Ron

  2. RonSonic said:

    Can I just say that this preannouncement announcement that someone somewhere in
    the peloton appears to have tested positive on one of several required tests is
    stupid, counterproductive and just plain bad for the sport.

    All the antidoping zealots who wonder how and why their cause has been accused
    of being destructive to the sport can sit and gaze at this glorious disgrace as
    an example.

    I am not pro dope, but if this is what anti-doping means then you can shove it
    up your ass.

    Ron

    BS is BS? The rider, the team and his/her federation is informed if an
    A sample turns up positive. At that point, the rider has the option of
    being a witness to the B sample test. Since the rider, his team and or
    his federation might go public at that point, the UCI preannounces.

  3. RonSonic said:

    Can I just say that this preannouncement announcement that someone somewhere in
    the peloton appears to have tested positive on one of several required tests is
    stupid, counterproductive and just plain bad for the sport.

    All the antidoping zealots who wonder how and why their cause has been accused
    of being destructive to the sport can sit and gaze at this glorious disgrace as
    an example.

    I am not pro dope, but if this is what anti-doping means then you can shove it
    up your ass.

    Ron

    I agree unfortunately this is only anecdotical in light of the
    cheating.

  4. Mike Kaiser said:
    RonSonic said:

    Can I just say that this preannouncement announcement that someone somewhere in
    the peloton appears to have tested positive on one of several required tests is
    stupid, counterproductive and just plain bad for the sport.

    All the antidoping zealots who wonder how and why their cause has been accused
    of being destructive to the sport can sit and gaze at this glorious disgrace as
    an example.

    I am not pro dope, but if this is what anti-doping means then you can shove it
    up your ass.

    Ron

    BS is BS? The rider, the team and his/her federation is informed if an
    A sample turns up positive. At that point, the rider has the option of
    being a witness to the B sample test. Since the rider, his team and or
    his federation might go public at that point, the UCI preannounces.

    Presumably, since the rider might commit suicide, the UCI should go
    ahead and shoot them.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.