Tiger only won one stage, just like Lance (currently)

[Mark]

Why did Tiger Woods win the British Open when he didn't have the
lowest score each day? (or to put it another way - why is Lance
leading when he has only one stage win - TTT?)

Round 2
David Frost - 65
Tiger Woods - 67

Round 3
Soren Hanson - 66
Tiger Woods - 71

Round 4
Graeme McDowell - 67
Tiger Woods - 70

Tour De France / British Open - you don't need to "win" each day to
take the overall title.

 

[David Ferguson]

As a brilliant dumbass on rbr once said:
"If someone doesn't understand the concept of cumulative time then
maybe they shouldn't even be watching that magic picture box with
little people in it."



On 19 Jul 2005 16:36:56 -0700, "Mark" <[email protected]> wrote:

>Why did Tiger Woods win the British Open when he didn't have the
>lowest score each day? (or to put it another way - why is Lance
>leading when he has only one stage win - TTT?)
>
>Round 2
>David Frost - 65
>Tiger Woods - 67
>
>Round 3
>Soren Hanson - 66
>Tiger Woods - 71
>
>Round 4
>Graeme McDowell - 67
>Tiger Woods - 70
>
>Tour De France / British Open - you don't need to "win" each day to
>take the overall title.

 

[Fred]

"David Ferguson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> As a brilliant dumbass on rbr once said:
> "If someone doesn't understand the concept of cumulative time then
> maybe they shouldn't even be watching that magic picture box with
> little people in it."
>
>

Actually, watching that magic picture box paves the road to dumbassdom.