My experience (5000 miles ++ on a recumbent) is that Conti makes the highest quality tyres. I
really like the Schwalbe Marathon (1.5" tyre), but I had serious issues with the Schwalbe
Stelvios. I ride a
26/16 recumbent, and the Stelvios lasted less than 1500 miles, just a few months for me. I've had
the same Conti Grand Prix 26x1 (25-559) tyre for two seasons now (3000 miles) and it still has
plenty of wear on it.
Chris Champion Vision R40 SWB OSS Double Vision R85 USS
[email protected] (mike s) wrote in message
news:<
[email protected]>...
> "Dave Larrington" <
[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:<
[email protected]>...
> > Personally I'd use Schwalbe Stelvios and be careful on the loose. Last night the old bill had
> > closed a road on my way home; faced with a choice of waiting or diverting down the
> > loose-surfaced canal towpath, I chose the latter. No problems with the Stelvio-shod Speedmachine
> > except getting the thing out through the gate at the other end.
> >
> > Dave Larrington -
http://legslarry.crosswinds.net/
> > ===========================================================
> > Editor - British Human Power Club Newsletter
> >
http://www.bhpc.org.uk/
> > ===========================================================
>
>
>
> All things being equal Istrongly prefer a good narrow tire over a wider one. My two favorites have
> been the Conti Grand Prix and the Schwalbe Stelvios. But not on dirt or gravel. On those surfaces
> I find them to ride "interestingly" at best. I have a lot of miles on Vredestein S-Licks and about
> 200 on Tioga Comp Pools. Of the two, if I want pure speed over all else then the Comp Pools are
> the ones. But they are wider (and taller) than the S-Licks and I find their ride a little
> "bouncier". The S-Licks seem to be a nice compromise of speed, performance and versatility. If I
> had to pick one tire for all around riding, with a variety of surfaces, the S-Licks get my vote.
> You might not get there as quickly as if you were using the other three, but you will get there
> more surefootedly (is that a word?).
>
> Mike S.