Rollers - Pros:smittymac said:I'm not asking which one is better than the other, what I want to know are the pros & cons of each.
Dave - have you tried one of the rollers with a resistance module? apparantly they're pretty good (i haven't tried one - just had them recommended).daveryanwyoming said:Rollers - Pros:
Cons:
- Fun
- Promotes balance
- Teaches you to ride a straight line
- Promotes smooth spin (if you care)
- Great for staying warm between track events
Trainers - Pros
- Requires skill to ride
- Takes practice to learn to stand, rest or ride no hands
- Rollers without fan or other resistance unit too easy even in big gears for serious power work
- Even folding designs a bit bigger than most rear wheel trainers, non folding designs much bigger to store and transport
Cons:
- No skill required
- Wider power range in most designs , better for high power workouts
- More portable
- Easy to standup, stretch, out of saddle work
That's what came to mind for me. I do most of my real indoor training on a Kurt Kinetics Road Machine, it's real quiet, has a wide power range and a big flywheel for smooth stroke. I still jump on rollers occasionally but even in big gears have to spin ridiculous rpms to get the power into decent training ranges so I use them more on rest weeks or carry them to the track for staying warm.
- Boring
- Fan units are loud
- Trainers with small flywheels feel unnatural, pulsed pedaling instead of smooth
- Most trainers wear out rear tires rapidly
Good luck,
Dave
Yeah, I owned a Kreitler with the headwind unit a long time ago. It does provide a lot of training resistance which really helps for tempo and even some hour TT (FTP-but we didn't call it that then, Andy et al hadn't invented the acronym yet ) work. But for anything harder I found I had to keep too much focus on riding smoothly and not falling off the rollers. So it wasn't good for hard short intervals or max efforts. At least not for me and I've been riding rollers a long time, am pretty comfortable on them and haven't actually fallen off a set since Ronald Reagan was in office but they still require some of my attention.Burble said:Dave - have you tried one of the rollers with a resistance module? ....
Burble said:I can help with this - i just went through the same decision (ended up buying a kurt kinetic trainer)
cons:
possibly shreds tyres (use old cheep tyres)
It all depends on how much you want to spend and how you want to use it.smittymac said:Well, I have decided on a trainer. The question now is, what one trainer better than another, and what features should I look for?
Spend about $200, and use it to train and get in shape for the spring.vascdoc said:It all depends on how much you want to spend and how you want to use it.
A fluid trainer will be the smoothest and have a large resistance curve. If you go fluid i would recommend something with a heavy flywheel. This will make for the smoothest pedaling and more road like feel. Cyclops fluid 2 and kurt kinetic fluid anything are both great. I've ridden both the fluid 2 and the kinetic rock & roll pro (similar to the kinetic pro trainer i think) and i thought the resistance and flywheel on the kinetic were really nice. I have an original cyclops fluid and think it's ****. Light flywheel and super steep resistance curve...my knees hate me every time i ride hard. My friend has the same thing and loves it though so to each his own. I ride rollers mostly...cyclops with resistance unit does the trick for everything but super hard intervals.smittymac said:Well, I have decided on a trainer. The question now is, what one trainer better than another, and what features should I look for?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.