trek 1.5 vs gary fisher arc super



jrt13

New Member
Nov 9, 2009
2
0
0
Hi all

Im looking at 3 different bikes. Im new to biking so not really sure of what i should get. I can get a 2009 trek 1.2 for $729, or a 2010 trek 1.5 for $1049, or my 3rd choice is a 2009 Gary Fisher Arc Super for $999

anyone have any of these bikes or know of a comparison. or should I just get the 1.2 for the least amount of money, or is it worth the extra $300 for one of the other bikes. I will ride once a week at the most, some times if even that.

any opinions are greatly appreciated

Thanks
Jeff
 
jrt13 said:
Hi all

Im looking at 3 different bikes. Im new to biking so not really sure of what i should get. I can get a 2009 trek 1.2 for $729, or a 2010 trek 1.5 for $1049, or my 3rd choice is a 2009 Gary Fisher Arc Super for $999

The Arc Super is a lot of bike for $999. Jump on it before it's gone. Size down 1 cm from the Treks because their nominal sizes are measured differently. That is, if you're looking at a 56 Trek, get a 55 Fisher.