Hey i just got a trek 5000, and the size frame i was said to have was a 62, im 6'1 and have long legs, dose this sound right to you guys?
thanks,
A community for cyclists, gear, training and racing.
Cycling Equipment · Public discussion
Thread details
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
Hey i just got a trek 5000, and the size frame i was said to have was a 62, im 6'1 and have long legs, dose this sound right to you guys?
thanks,
irlrugby83 said:Hey i just got a trek 5000, and the size frame i was said to have was a 62, im 6'1 and have long legs, dose this sound right to you guys?
thanks,
Duno. Everyone is different.I'm 6', long legs and ride a 58.YMMV.
irlrugby83 said:Hey i just got a trek 5000, and the size frame i was said to have was a 62, im 6'1 and have long legs, dose this sound right to you guys?
thanks,
I just bought a Trek 5000 last month. I'm 6' I was fitted at my LBS he recommended 58 for my build. Works for me a very comfortable ride.
Everyone is different...I'm 6'1" as well and most of my bikes have had a 57cm seat tube.
(damn these stumpy legs!!!)
Yup, I spent hours getting fitted & riding different bikes. Wound up on a 56cm, to my surprise; I'm 5'11", ~34" inseam. The LBS guy who helped me said it looked like I had more of my leg length in the calf than thigh, compared to others he'd fitted. I just felt too stretched out on the 58.
Active in the last 60 minutes
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.