Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Trek 7200 vs. 7300 ... help!!!

Started by saabcaptain · · Last activity · 5 posts · 3,043 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
25 July 2004
Last activity
1 August 2004
Original author
saabcaptain
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
3,043
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. My wife and I have decided to get our first bicycles in 10 years. I have previous road bike experience and my wife used to have a mountain bike. Since we want to remain sitting upright and relaxed and since our bikes will mainly be used in the "burbs" on pavement and perhaps at most on a highly groomed trail a hybrid seems an obvious choice. The bikes will be used for enjoyment and light exercise more than any formal training goal.

    For price considerations we are limiting our selection to the Trek 7300/7200/7100 series of bikes, their hybrids. It seems everywhere in our area the 2004 models are sold out and the 2005 are just starting to arrive so this purchase will be made in the next 2-4 weeks as the appropriate 2005 model arrives. Right now mens frames are only starting to trickle in but our LBS says for sure within the next 3-4 weeks they should have any option available. Based on the 7100 series there have been no changes between 2004/05 accept for paint. Details of the 7200/7300 2004/05 differences are as of yet unavailable.

    This is where I get lost: I am trying to decide between the 7100/200/300 series. I feel fine about the price of the 7200 so because I do believe paying more you get better components and features I will rule out the 7100. However the price of getting two 7300's is getting a bit steep for the use of these bikes, but I am willing to do so if it will increase my enjoyment of the bicycle. I have asked folks at the LBS want the differences are and they say "a nicer handle bar, better derailleur etc." None of which means anything to me from a practicle standpoint. How is it nicer? Will I notice? What makes one derailleur better than another? Weight? Reliablity?

    Assuming the 2004 stats remain the same here are the areas of difference in the 7300 vs. 7200 series. Can you please help me get a concrete idea of "what I am getting" that is better and why if I buy a 7300! Thanks!!!

    Price: 7300 $470 / 7200 $390

    Wheels: 7300 Alloy F, Shimano C201 R hub; ACE19 rims / 7200 Alloy F, Shimano RM40 R hub, Matrix 750 rims

    Tires: 7300 Bontrager Invert HC, Kevlar belt, 700x35c / 7200 Bontrager Invert Select, 700x35c

    Handlebars: 7300 Bontrager Bar-Keeper / 7200 55mm rise

    Shifters: 7300 SRAM ESP Pro / 7200 SRAM MRX Plus

    Front Derailleur: 7300 Shimano T301 / 7200 Shimano C102

    Rear Derailleur: 7300 SRAM X.7 / 7200 Shimano Alivio

    Crankset: 7300 Bontrager Sport 48/38/28 / 7200 Shimano C203 48/38/28

    THOSE ARE THE ONLY DIFFERENCES, that I am aware of besides paint. How will these differences be seen or felt over time? Thanks again!

    Dave

  2. Well, I can't speak for the the 7200 or the 7300, I can tell you that my father just recently bought a 7100, he likes it a lot. He's coming from a "department store" bike, and he says this one is much speedier and very comfortable. Not sure if he would have noticed the difference in the derailleurs as he uses it for casual exercise on paved roads and doesn't really have a need for constant shifting. For what it's worth, he seems to be very happy with the lower end 7100.

    Cheers

  3. Zer0hmz said:

    Well, I can't speak for the the 7200 or the 7300, I can tell you that my father just recently bought a 7100, he likes it a lot. He's coming from a "department store" bike, and he says this one is much speedier and very comfortable. Not sure if he would have noticed the difference in the derailleurs as he uses it for casual exercise on paved roads and doesn't really have a need for constant shifting. For what it's worth, he seems to be very happy with the lower end 7100.

    Cheers


    I'm sure all the 7100/7200/7300 are excellent and would be great bikes for my wife and I. That said I am willing to pay more for better, I just want to understand the specifics of why the 7300 is better than the 7200. Thanks everyone!

  4. saabcaptain said:

    I'm sure all the 7100/7200/7300 are excellent and would be great bikes for my wife and I. That said I am willing to pay more for better, I just want to understand the specifics of why the 7300 is better than the 7200. Thanks everyone!

    It has some slightly more upscale parts, NONE of which are considered anything special. In a blind test you could likely not tell the difference.How well they shift is more a function of the skill of the person doing the adjusting rather than the components.Buy the one that comes in the color you like better.

  5. Hi Dave, I just got back into riding too. I got the Trek 7100 for myself and a Navigator 100 for my daughter,(she insisted on the thicker tires)
    the 7100 is GREAT the features on the 7200 and 7300 don't warrant the cost as they don't make a noticable difference, I rode them all. I even might get my wife one if she is not happy spinning on my daughters Navigator.
    Get the 7100 you cannot go wrong.

    Regards Tony🙂

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.