Apparently you care what the pros ride because you're the one that brought the topic up. So if you're going to use what the pros ride as cover for your ignorance about science and engineering, then it's perfectly valid for others to use what the pros ride to show that your incorrect assumptions are just that: incorrect.
The fact is you know nothing about what you're talking about. You'd like to think you've gained knowledge by having seen something or talked to a buddy, but the fact is that history is rife with people who incorrectly made conclusions based on what they thought they saw. It is for that reason that we have something called "scientific method" upon which all science and engineering is based. It removes personal bias and subjectivity from analysis and provides a mechanism for others to verify or disprove theories and hypotheses. You should look it up: "s-c-i-e-n-t-i-f-c m-e-t-h-o-d."
The fact that you can't look at this issue objectively is painfully obvious. You make stupid assumption about people based on what you think you read in their posts. You hold to some extreme belief...actually it's nearly a religion for you....regarding materials, a belief that has no scientific basis whatsoever. And to top if off, you are completely unable to critically analyze or respond to any posts, questions, ideas, etc.
If you did even the most rudimentary search, you'd find that there are plenty of examples of Ti failing, just as there are examples of steel, Al, CF, Mg failing. If you spent even a picosecond thinking, then, you'd realize that since all materials that bikes have been made from have failed at some time or another, design, construction, and proper use of a given material are the critical factors, NOT solely the material itself.
Alas, I don't think anyone expects you to think. I'd say most view you as a persistent troll, one so bored with his lackluster life that he has to keep digging up the same dead and trite digs and claims to spew on a BBS.
