I submit that on or about 16 Jul 2005 23:12:42 -0700, the person known
to the court as
[email protected] made a statement
(<
[email protected]> in Your
Honour's bundle) to the following effect:
>The "standard" drive train is a big plus IMVAIO, as is the stronger
>frame. The Nexus type rear hub is attractive to manufacturers, but it
>is too complex, and it makes changing a flat in the rear a pain (I have
>a Dahon Speed TR with the internal hub).
Dogmatic assertion from Scharf: engage scepticism.
There are several pluses of the Nexus hub gear, of which low
maintenance and the ability to use wider chains are two. A hub gear
is also less vulnerable to mechanical damage in transit.
Hub gears are hugely popular with utility cyclists for these and other
reasons. So, if utility is your bag, then don't discount the hub
because of the fact that it makes changing a flat marginally more
difficult. I have not had a flat in six months of daily cycle
commuting, and I can only recall maybe two flats when commuting that
were not in Schwalbe Stelvio tyres. How many people here use racing
slicks on their folding bikes?
So fit the Nexus, which is as reliable as you'd expect from the
Japanese, and fit Schwalbe Marathon tyres
Guy
--
May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
85% of helmet statistics are made up, 69% of them at CHS, Puget Sound