N
Nick Kew
Guest
In article <[email protected]>,
Helen Deborah Vecht <[email protected]> writes:
> It is to be *drunk* in charge of a carriage (of which a bicycle is one).
> Drunk usually implies a higher level of intoxication than the
> drink/drive limit.
Which is as it should be. In the fresh air, doing good exercise, and
without the isolation of a glass case, you're naturally much more
aware of all that's going on around you, so a small amount of alcohol
has far less effect when cycling than driving.
Of course if you're so boozed as to feel sloshed then cycling isn't
a good idea either.
--
Nick Kew
Nick's manifesto: http://www.htmlhelp.com/~nick/
Helen Deborah Vecht <[email protected]> writes:
> It is to be *drunk* in charge of a carriage (of which a bicycle is one).
> Drunk usually implies a higher level of intoxication than the
> drink/drive limit.
Which is as it should be. In the fresh air, doing good exercise, and
without the isolation of a glass case, you're naturally much more
aware of all that's going on around you, so a small amount of alcohol
has far less effect when cycling than driving.
Of course if you're so boozed as to feel sloshed then cycling isn't
a good idea either.
--
Nick Kew
Nick's manifesto: http://www.htmlhelp.com/~nick/